Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Looking for a high single core performance VDS for a modded Minecraft server

clawmarkclawmark Member
edited August 2024 in Requests

CPU: high single core performance (Ryzen 5950X / 7950X3D or similar)
Number of vCores: 2-4 (Minecraft is mainly single threaded)
RAM: 8GB+
Disk Space: 50GB+ (bare minimum, more is always better for backups :smile:)
Disk Type: SSD/NVMe
Bandwidth: Low, only 2-3 players and mainly on the weekends, max 1TB is necessary I would assume.
Port Speed: 1Gbps (?) don't even need that much I guess
DDoS Protection: No
Number of IPs: 1
Location: EU
Budget: Up to 15 euro ($16) / month

Have been looking at many offers, best I've found so far is:
Layer7 (8GB RAM / 2 vCores 7950X3D / 13.74 eur ($15))

Also looked at Albahost "VDS" but they impose 80% per CPU usage limits? Good price, but it's not really a VDS.

Any better (or similar) offers than the Layer7 one? Thank you!

Comments

  • mustafamw3mustafamw3 Member, Patron Provider, LIR
    edited August 2024

    VDS 1
    Powerful Amd Ryzen 9 5950x
    1 Dedicated vCPU
    200GB NVMe Disk
    4GB DDR4 RAM
    5TB Bandwidth/mo
    1Gbps port speed
    /80 IPv6
    Price: $6/month(8$ with IPv4)
    Order Now

    VDS 2
    Powerful Amd Ryzen 9 5950x
    2 Dedicated vCPUs
    400GB NVMe Disk
    8GB DDR4 RAM
    10TB Bandwidth/mo
    1Gbps port speed
    /80 IPv6
    Price: $12/month (14$ with IPv4)
    Order Now

    We accept credit card , cypto

    https://racknode.net/vps/

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • mustafamw3mustafamw3 Member, Patron Provider, LIR
    Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 3393.624 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
     Total Disk         : 399.9 GB (4.8 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 7.8 GB (324.6 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 35 min
     Load average       : 0.03, 0.26, 0.17
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-9-amd64
     Virtualization     : KVM
     TCP Control        : cubic
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Primary Network    : IPv6
     IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
     IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
     ISP                : Hetzner Online GmbH
     ASN                : AS24940 Hetzner Online GmbH
     Host               : Power DC Limited
     Location           : Falkenstein, Saxony-SN, Germany
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 217.59 MB/s  (54.3k) | 2.41 GB/s    (37.7k)
    Write      | 218.17 MB/s  (54.5k) | 2.42 GB/s    (37.9k)
    Total      | 435.77 MB/s (108.9k) | 4.84 GB/s    (75.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.09 GB/s     (6.0k) | 3.56 GB/s     (3.4k)
    Write      | 3.25 GB/s     (6.3k) | 3.79 GB/s     (3.7k)
    Total      | 6.34 GB/s    (12.3k) | 7.35 GB/s     (7.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 925 Mbits/sec   | 921 Mbits/sec   | 22.7 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 933 Mbits/sec   | 932 Mbits/sec   | --
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 867 Mbits/sec   | 550 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 777 Mbits/sec   | 602 Mbits/sec   | 243 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 785 Mbits/sec   | 418 Mbits/sec   | 151 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 850 Mbits/sec   | 604 Mbits/sec   | 778 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 750 Mbits/sec   | 298 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 911 Mbits/sec   | 912 Mbits/sec   | 22.7 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | --
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 855 Mbits/sec   | 478 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 769 Mbits/sec   | 563 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 790 Mbits/sec   | 358 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 836 Mbits/sec   | 615 Mbits/sec   | 94.2 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 750 Mbits/sec   | 204 Mbits/sec   | 173 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1705
    Multi Core      | 3151
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22724359
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2210
    Multi Core      | 3941
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7100580
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     Frankfurt, DE      5.47 ms   0.0%    921.90 Mbps    921.38 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
    
     Dallas, US       132.72 ms   0.0%    900.71 Mbps    610.59 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Houston, TX      127.44 ms   0.0%    908.01 Mbps    684.83 Mbps    Ezee Fiber - Houston, TX
     Chicago, IL      103.29 ms   0.0%    919.89 Mbps    827.92 Mbps    Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
     Miami, US        123.02 ms   N/A     651.45 Mbps    577.21 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, NY      86.43 ms   0.0%    922.06 Mbps    849.51 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
     Miami, FL        116.62 ms   0.0%    844.49 Mbps    746.38 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL
     Spokane, WA      152.75 ms   0.0%    889.35 Mbps    568.73 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
     Seattle, WA      159.41 ms   0.0%    619.88 Mbps    559.44 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  150.51 ms   0.0%    855.85 Mbps    583.38 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     San Jose, CA     153.19 ms   0.0%    660.17 Mbps    584.16 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA
    
     London, UK        22.11 ms   0.0%    928.97 Mbps    912.69 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London
     Amsterdam, NL     12.99 ms   0.0%    939.89 Mbps    929.64 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
     Paris, FR         30.31 ms   N/A     945.60 Mbps    912.58 Mbps    Axione - Paris
     Warsaw, PL        27.26 ms   0.0%    929.54 Mbps    903.22 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
     Kyiv, UA          31.41 ms   0.0%    939.32 Mbps    914.91 Mbps    O3 - Kyiv
     Bucharest, RO     43.78 ms   0.0%    940.24 Mbps    899.64 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest
    
     Bangalore, IN    132.86 ms   0.0%    724.25 Mbps    625.56 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      148.23 ms   N/A     809.96 Mbps    611.17 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       124.85 ms   0.0%    760.06 Mbps    542.35 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
     Mumbai, MH       130.11 ms   N/A     823.89 Mbps    704.56 Mbps    Jio - Mumbai
     Delhi, IN        167.05 ms   0.0%    662.10 Mbps    566.36 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Jeddah, SA       84.13 ms    0.0%    951.68 Mbps    851.58 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
     Dubai, AE        126.71 ms   0.0%    938.24 Mbps    687.41 Mbps    du - Dubai
    
     Hong Kong        206.61 ms   0.0%    899.96 Mbps    212.46 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
     Sydney           292.53 ms   0.0%    536.79 Mbps    307.34 Mbps    Telstra - Sydney
     Perth            204.10 ms   0.0%    744.86 Mbps    433.61 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Perth
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 836.06 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 694.23 Mbps
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Speedtest by Ookla
    
    Server: i3D.net - Dallas, TX 
    Idle Latency:   133.47 ms   (jitter: 0.14ms, low: 133.44ms, high: 133.91ms)
        Download:   899.31 Mbps (data used: 1.4 GB)
                    199.92 ms   (jitter: 62.51ms, low: 132.67ms, high: 269.60ms)
          Upload:   643.30 Mbps (data used: 852.6 MB)
                    194.70 ms   (jitter: 62.55ms, low: 133.58ms, high: 267.29ms)
     Packet Loss:     0.0%
      Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/387b06d9-05d3-4f44-aa6a-4ad7113a4079
    
    Server: RETN - London, UK
    Idle Latency:    15.46 ms   (jitter: 0.02ms, low: 15.45ms, high: 15.49ms)
        Download:   940.15 Mbps (data used: 1.1 GB)
                     58.01 ms   (jitter: 40.09ms, low: 15.31ms, high: 310.97ms)
          Upload:   932.86 Mbps (data used: 984.4 MB)
                     15.43 ms   (jitter: 0.13ms, low: 15.24ms, high: 15.86ms)
     Packet Loss:     0.0%
      Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/b4e4ec4b-7b48-4a52-a96d-7a6fbc917b42
    
    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • Petey_LongPetey_Long Barred
    edited August 2024

    Posted on wrong post, my bad!

  • @mustafamw3 said:
    VDS 1
    Powerful Amd Ryzen 9 5950x
    1 Dedicated vCPU
    200GB NVMe Disk
    4GB DDR4 RAM
    5TB Bandwidth/mo
    1Gbps port speed
    /80 IPv6
    Price: $6/month(8$ with IPv4)
    Order Now

    VDS 2
    Powerful Amd Ryzen 9 5950x
    2 Dedicated vCPUs
    400GB NVMe Disk
    8GB DDR4 RAM
    10TB Bandwidth/mo
    1Gbps port speed
    /80 IPv6
    Price: $12/month (14$ with IPv4)
    Order Now

    We accept credit card , cypto

    https://racknode.net/vps/

    RackNode VDS_2 performance has been solid with dedicated resources and no cap on cpu core utilization

  • Kevinf100Kevinf100 Member
    edited August 2024

    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • clawmarkclawmark Member
    edited August 2024

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2024

    @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

    The problem with flying around is that it generates chunks too rapidly which slows down the server significantly. If you pregen, then it won't be a problem because those chunks are already generated and there's no need to perform any background calculations while you are flying. Order a VPS with big storage and pregen a decent radius that you would be expecting to fly around within.

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • @Advin said:

    @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

    The problem with flying around is that it generates chunks too rapidly which slows down the server significantly. If you pregen, then it won't be a problem because those chunks are already generated and there's no need to perform any background calculations while you are flying. Order a VPS with big storage and pregen a decent radius that you would be expecting to fly around within.

    I understand that completely. I just think it's inconvenient and not foolproof that we won't hit ungenerated chunks soon after. I also think a VPS is risky for a game server because of the CPU fair usage limits. Don't want to break any ToS. That's why I am looking for a VDS specifically.

  • Kevinf100Kevinf100 Member
    edited August 2024

    @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/192644/64-95-m-ryzen-dedicated-server-8gb-epyc-deals-starting-60-year/p1

    EPYC- 32GB.

    In BetterMC I pregen the world 10k chunks in overworld, nether, and the_end. Didn't do other worlds yet. Other worlds besides those have been explored, but not really a lot so I didn't bother.

    World size is 12GB and backups are around 8GB atm.

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider

    Really need a VPS for it? If you want something in the US my game hosting plans (with Pterodactyl panel) are being setup with new Ryzen 7900 systems in Texas. I could give you a good deal for a plan on one. CPU resources are always much lower than a VPS hypervisor... if you want performance, then using game hosting plans is probably going to give you much better performance than a VPS.

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • kenjing789kenjing789 Member
    edited August 2024

    If you have Oracle Cloud account , you van run mc server on those and still have good experience.
    Am was running ATM 6 7 9 , VH3 , FTB with stable 10-15s fine on those.
    You can use some mod to make the server multi threading and it run smoothly with basic clock speed (most server lock base clock)

    Thanked by 1clawmark
  • @Kevinf100 said:

    @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/192644/64-95-m-ryzen-dedicated-server-8gb-epyc-deals-starting-60-year/p1

    EPYC- 32GB.

    In BetterMC I pregen the world 10k chunks in overworld, nether, and the_end. Didn't do other worlds yet. Other worlds besides those have been explored, but not really a lot so I didn't bother.

    World size is 12GB and backups are around 8GB atm.

    10k chunk radius really? So 160000 blocks? I tried running chunky yesterday but didn't realize the radius is actually in blocks and not chunks. It takes a lot of time, not that it matters while we are not online. Around 6-7 hours for 10000 block radius. Honestly, it's a perfectly fine experience on Oracle free tier it's just that slow chunk generation and crashing is extremely annoying when exploring in a straight line.

    I could be misconceiving things and these 2vCores of 7950x won't do me much justice, as pre-generating chunks is "almost mandatory" on modded Minecraft, or so I've read. Also turns out that modern Minecraft chunk generation is multi-threaded. Didn't know that, so my initial assumptions are wrong and more vCores might be needed.

    Anyways thank you for the posts, made me reconsider some things.

  • @MikeA said:
    Really need a VPS for it? If you want something in the US my game hosting plans (with Pterodactyl panel) are being setup with new Ryzen 7900 systems in Texas. I could give you a good deal for a plan on one. CPU resources are always much lower than a VPS hypervisor... if you want performance, then using game hosting plans is probably going to give you much better performance than a VPS.

    Not necessarily I suppose, it's just that a VDS would give me more freedom on the setup of the server, could also use it for other tasks too. I'm open to hearing the offer, but the latency to Texas would be pretty bad for me as I am located in the EU.

  • @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:

    @clawmark said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Been running ATM9 and BetterMC on a 8 core (4 dedicated, 4 shared) EPYC 7702 (1200 GB6) VPS with around 5/10 players max. The trick is to pregen the world. You can also go further and find some server side mods that will increase performance.

    What provider are you using? I understand pre-generating would work, but only to some extent as we do a bunch of exploring with flying mounts. Already know about the perf mods as I'm using the Oracle Free Tier currently. It's good as long as you don't need to generate new chunks quickly. Even tends to crash the whole server. :smiley:

    EDIT: Just saw the mention of the GB6 score. Oracle free tier is ~1100 single core. Might be of interest for you. Just don't know if there's some performance disadvantage in it being an ARM server compared to x86.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/192644/64-95-m-ryzen-dedicated-server-8gb-epyc-deals-starting-60-year/p1

    EPYC- 32GB.

    In BetterMC I pregen the world 10k chunks in overworld, nether, and the_end. Didn't do other worlds yet. Other worlds besides those have been explored, but not really a lot so I didn't bother.

    World size is 12GB and backups are around 8GB atm.

    10k chunk radius really? So 160000 blocks? I tried running chunky yesterday but didn't realize the radius is actually in blocks and not chunks. It takes a lot of time, not that it matters while we are not online. Around 6-7 hours for 10000 block radius. Honestly, it's a perfectly fine experience on Oracle free tier it's just that slow chunk generation and crashing is extremely annoying when exploring in a straight line.

    I could be misconceiving things and these 2vCores of 7950x won't do me much justice, as pre-generating chunks is "almost mandatory" on modded Minecraft, or so I've read. Also turns out that modern Minecraft chunk generation is multi-threaded. Didn't know that, so my initial assumptions are wrong and more vCores might be needed.

    Anyways thank you for the posts, made me reconsider some things.

    Chunky is chunks, not blocks. I don't think it's possible to generate block by block, Minecraft worlds save and load by chunks.
    https://github.com/pop4959/Chunky/wiki/Shapes

  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider

    @clawmark said:

    @MikeA said:
    Really need a VPS for it? If you want something in the US my game hosting plans (with Pterodactyl panel) are being setup with new Ryzen 7900 systems in Texas. I could give you a good deal for a plan on one. CPU resources are always much lower than a VPS hypervisor... if you want performance, then using game hosting plans is probably going to give you much better performance than a VPS.

    Not necessarily I suppose, it's just that a VDS would give me more freedom on the setup of the server, could also use it for other tasks too. I'm open to hearing the offer, but the latency to Texas would be pretty bad for me as I am located in the EU.

    Ah sorry I thought you were looking for US for some reason. I got mixed up.

Sign In or Register to comment.