Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Special offer from MailChannels for existing MailBaby customers

13

Comments

  • FatGrizzlyFatGrizzly Member, Host Rep

    @BlaZe said:

    @Francisco said:

    @interservermike said:
    Agreed. But maybe someone will search mailbaby vs mailchannels or mailchannels alternative

    They're about to spend the other half of the AI budget to get @jbiloh to nuke this or move it out of google search reach.

    Francisco

    Maybe @raindog308 can write an article about this on LEB. Classic example of a bad PR in the hosting industry
    OR
    Top 5 bad PR strategies of the decade (5 can goto 50 maybe for the decade)

    If this gets published, I can maybe use this as an example while teaching to my students of B School

    EDIT:
    @mc_ksimpson
    Although you admit that this thread was your own idea but if this bad PR idea was given to you by any of your subordinates then you know it's time to boot that person, as this has done more damage to your brand than you can imagine.

    The LEB post will be filtered due to "Administrative Decisions" by Jon.

    Simpsons has paid for his patron provider tag, it will get delisted some how or the other with some admin fees probably.

    Mailchannels shocked, Baby Rocked.


    to help with seo, mailchannels vs mailbaby

    Thanked by 1BlaZe
  • caracalcaracal Member

    I need more baby puns

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • LeviLevi Member
    edited May 2024

    @caracal said:
    I need more baby puns

    Mailchannels will rename to femailchannels and mail.baby will become mail.man.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    They can make the pricing stick for 12 months, or 36 months, IF you have a high enough volume, that means, that you get the cheap price for 36 months if you prove that you have a lot to lose by switching away after 36 months.

    Good luck to @interservermike, we can all appreciate a newcomer (not to the industry, but to the market segment)

  • @Levi said:

    @caracal said:
    I need more baby puns

    Mailchannels will rename to femailchannels

    Not sure if inclusive or offending.

    Not sure if inclusive or offending feminist meme

    Thanked by 2Smigit sasslik
  • Could I use MailChannels on VPS like mail.baby?
    https://www.mail.baby/tips/mailbaby-for-postfix/
    My email volume is very small, only tens of thousands of emails on dozens of VPSs.
    Another question is whether I can open an account like Mail.baby. For example, account 1 is used on 1-10 VPS, and account 2 is used on 11-20 VPS...
    This will provide more granular control.

  • What a way to ruin business rep :D

    Thanked by 1sasslik
  • M66BM66B Veteran

    I would like to see numbers supporting these statements:

    MailBaby simply can't demonstrate the same track record of reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers. And the gap is only going to widen.

    Go with the real MailChannels - more reliable and better supported, as proven by our top-tier customer base.

    No numbers = doesn't exist.

    The rest doesn't matter, except that it will confirm that Mailchannel is over the top, or better said bottom low now.

  • @mc_ksimpson said:
    Hi Everyone,

    I sincerely apologize for criticizing MailBaby in my original post. I should have stuck to describing our offer, which is aggressive enough by its nature. @interservermike, calling MailBaby out for the false positive downtime on May 15th was a bad call on my part. I'm sorry about this.

    I also want to apologize for the delay in responding to sales inquiries. We are working hard to reply to everyone as quickly as possible.

    To clarify the concerns about price stability, if anyone wants a long term deal, we can arrange a term commitment of up to 36 months. Please note that term commitments do imply a minimum volume commitment, whereas the currently offered deal has no minimum volume requirement.

    We are committed to making a positive and growing contribution to the LowEndTalk community and to learning from our missteps. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out directly using our contact form: https://info.mailchannels.com/switch-to-mailchannels

    Thank you for your understanding and candid feedback.

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @M66B said: I would like to see numbers supporting these statements:

    Numbers? Supporting what?

    This?

    MailBaby simply can't demonstrate the same track record of reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers.

    That's obvious, no? MailChannels have been in the business of selling an email sending service for far longer, obviously they can demonstrate a longer track record.

    The thread is as said bad, but that was one of the few arguments from their side that I can definitely agree with. It looks bad coming from them, but it's still true.

  • M66BM66B Veteran

    @emgh said:

    @M66B said: I would like to see numbers supporting these statements:

    Numbers? Supporting what?

    This?

    MailBaby simply can't demonstrate the same track record of reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers.

    That's obvious, no? MailChannels have been in the business of selling an email sending service for far longer, obviously they can demonstrate a longer track record.

    The thread is as said bad, but that was one of the few arguments from their side that I can definitely agree with. It looks bad coming from them, but it's still true.

    They have a longer track record, in the sense they exist longer. But how about "reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers" ? How reliable are they in fact, and how scaleable are they in fact, and how demanding are their customers in fact? The point is that these are vague statements basically saying nothing.

    So, what I am asking is to quantify these statements. They obviously can't and even if they can, the question remains how this compares to the growing up child.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @M66B said: They have a longer track record, in the sense they exist longer. But how about "reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers" ? How reliable are they in fact, and how scaleable are they in fact, and how demanding are their customers in fact? The point is that these are vague statements basically saying nothing.

    I believe MailChannels send quantities that the Baby don't, @interservermike even said he instructed the bigger clients/potential clients to go to MC as I understood him.

  • M66BM66B Veteran

    @emgh said:

    @M66B said: They have a longer track record, in the sense they exist longer. But how about "reliability and scalability for the most demanding customers" ? How reliable are they in fact, and how scaleable are they in fact, and how demanding are their customers in fact? The point is that these are vague statements basically saying nothing.

    I believe MailChannels send quantities that the Baby don't, @interservermike even said he instructed the bigger clients/potential clients to go to MC as I understood him.

    I prefer quality to quantity. Better one bag with gold than ten with dust.

  • @M66B said:

    Better one bag with gold than ten with dust.

    What about 10 bags of gold dust?

  • KassemKassem Member

    @mc_ksimpson said:
    Hi Everyone,

    I sincerely apologize for criticizing MailBaby in my original post. I should have stuck to describing our offer, which is aggressive enough by its nature. @interservermike, calling MailBaby out for the false positive downtime on May 15th was a bad call on my part. I'm sorry about this.

    I also want to apologize for the delay in responding to sales inquiries. We are working hard to reply to everyone as quickly as possible.

    To clarify the concerns about price stability, if anyone wants a long term deal, we can arrange a term commitment of up to 36 months. Please note that term commitments do imply a minimum volume commitment, whereas the currently offered deal has no minimum volume requirement.

    We are committed to making a positive and growing contribution to the LowEndTalk community and to learning from our missteps. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out directly using our contact form: https://info.mailchannels.com/switch-to-mailchannels

    Thank you for your understanding and candid feedback.

    I thought with all the AI you are exposed to, you would say that the AI made you do it!

    If sincere, make this https://info.mailchannels.com/switch-to-mailchannels a 404 ASAP.

    It's really tasteless.

  • interservermikeinterservermike Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 2024

    @Kassem said:

    @mc_ksimpson said:
    Hi Everyone,

    I sincerely apologize for criticizing MailBaby in my original post. I should have stuck to describing our offer, which is aggressive enough by its nature. @interservermike, calling MailBaby out for the false positive downtime on May 15th was a bad call on my part. I'm sorry about this.

    I also want to apologize for the delay in responding to sales inquiries. We are working hard to reply to everyone as quickly as possible.

    To clarify the concerns about price stability, if anyone wants a long term deal, we can arrange a term commitment of up to 36 months. Please note that term commitments do imply a minimum volume commitment, whereas the currently offered deal has no minimum volume requirement.

    We are committed to making a positive and growing contribution to the LowEndTalk community and to learning from our missteps. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out directly using our contact form: https://info.mailchannels.com/switch-to-mailchannels

    Thank you for your understanding and candid feedback.

    I thought with all the AI you are exposed to, you would say that the AI made you do it!

    If sincere, make this https://info.mailchannels.com/switch-to-mailchannels a 404 ASAP.

    It's really tasteless.

    I fully support what they are doing. We need healthy competition. Web host like ourselves have been getting taken advantage of for far too long. Competition is good.

  • KassemKassem Member

    @interservermike said: I fully support what they are doing. We need healthy competition. Web host like ourselves have been getting taken advantage of for far too long. Competition is good.

    I agree that competition is good, of course, but this campaign was very poorly executed. It could have been done in a much better way.

    The silver lining here is that now everyone knows they can trust InterServer with their business.

  • Using mail baby since last 1 year I can say service is good with very reasonable pricing
    all my clients 110 hosting customers are very much satisfied

  • I won't be using MC just because of this horrible marketing.

  • ZhenmueZhenmue Member

    well, mailbaby is down again :'(

  • @JoseDieguez said:
    well, mailbaby is down again :'(

    What is down? Service is working for me.

  • ZhenmueZhenmue Member
    edited May 2024

    @Oldschool said:

    @JoseDieguez said:
    well, mailbaby is down again :'(

    What is down? Service is working for me.

    their entire clientarea, the mail.outbounprotection, so we cant see "why" clients are bouncing.

    seems to be loading again

    Thanked by 1Oldschool
  • kuroitkuroit Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    Thank you! going to register at mail.baby, need it for our new hosting setup! :)

  • rubenruben Member, Host Rep

    @mc_ksimpson said: For a limited time, get the real MailChannels advantage at an unbeatable price! We're offering MailBaby customers just $0.15/thousand messages with no monthly account fee

    Would be way better if you had kept the old promo pricing on some specials that were promoted here a couple years ago instead of upgrading them now into the 79.99/mo pricing..

    Anyway, thanks for the recommendation of mail.baby. Gonna try it out! :)

  • EthernetServersEthernetServers Member, Patron Provider

    @JoseDieguez said:

    @Oldschool said:

    @JoseDieguez said:
    well, mailbaby is down again :'(

    What is down? Service is working for me.

    their entire clientarea, the mail.outbounprotection, so we cant see "why" clients are bouncing.

    seems to be loading again

    https://interserver.statuspage.io/incidents/6xjwhdhxqmk7

  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member

    Lmao, talk about overdramatic. Never let any of the hosts that commented above tell you they don't love drama when they reach like this.

    Y'all are mad a competitor is competiting in a free market? It's freedom of speech nerds.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @SirFoxy said:
    Lmao, talk about overdramatic. Never let any of the hosts that commented above tell you they don't love drama when they reach like this.

    Y'all are mad a competitor is competiting in a free market? It's freedom of speech nerds.

    Why are you even still here?

  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member

    @emgh said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Lmao, talk about overdramatic. Never let any of the hosts that commented above tell you they don't love drama when they reach like this.

    Y'all are mad a competitor is competiting in a free market? It's freedom of speech nerds.

    Why are you even still here?

    To look at threads like this and observe the absolute groupthink that exists here in awe.

    How do you get offended at this thread?

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @SirFoxy said:

    @emgh said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Lmao, talk about overdramatic. Never let any of the hosts that commented above tell you they don't love drama when they reach like this.

    Y'all are mad a competitor is competiting in a free market? It's freedom of speech nerds.

    Why are you even still here?

    To look at threads like this and observe the absolute groupthink that exists here in awe.

    How do you get offended at this thread?

    If this is so below your superior intellect, wouldn’t you be better off using that intellect somewhere where it can be productive for you?

Sign In or Register to comment.