Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CHAT - HOST-C Xeon V4, 5TB Storage Deal, 12.5 USD / Quarter, 45 USD / YR

17810121352

Comments

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited March 2024

    I give you my word, by next week it is going to get much better.

    My bozos are gonna put a few more nodes in the mix.

    EDIT:

    @sh97 said: didn't see any CPU steal either.

    we monitor that frequently, but if some sees something off, report it via a ticket please.

    Thanked by 3sh97 remy dev_vps
  • remyremy Member

    @sh97 said:
    @remy curious how much speeds are you getting with rsync, and where is the origin server located?
    I was doing SCP from NYC to RO, and it took ~12 hours to move 1TB

    I've just started the migration.
    The source server is located in Germany

    There are a lot of parameters that can vary the result.... but here are some of my statistics ;) For what it is worth

    For the moment, I'm transferring at a speed of 45.265 MiB/s.
    But also at times it goes much lower (17MiB/s) . I've seen peaks of 77MiB/s...
    I think it would be better to give you an average transfer rate when it's finished.

    ETA 19h21m3s for ~3,4TB

    Not bad at all

    Thanked by 3sh97 dev_vps host_c
  • @remy said:

    @sh97 said:
    @remy curious how much speeds are you getting with rsync, and where is the origin server located?
    I was doing SCP from NYC to RO, and it took ~12 hours to move 1TB

    I've just started the migration.
    The source server is located in Germany

    There are a lot of parameters that can vary the result.... but here are some of my statistics ;) For what it is worth

    For the moment, I'm transferring at a speed of 45.265 MiB/s.
    But also at times it goes much lower (17MiB/s) . I've seen peaks of 77MiB/s...
    I think it would be better to give you an average transfer rate when it's finished.

    ETA 19h21m3s for ~3,4TB

    Not bad at all

    I use WinSCP (with background threads processing),
    the cpu % load is under 10%, most of the time under 6%

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • sliixsliix Member

    @remy said:

    @sh97 said:
    @remy curious how much speeds are you getting with rsync, and where is the origin server located?
    I was doing SCP from NYC to RO, and it took ~12 hours to move 1TB

    I've just started the migration.
    The source server is located in Germany

    There are a lot of parameters that can vary the result.... but here are some of my statistics ;) For what it is worth

    For the moment, I'm transferring at a speed of 45.265 MiB/s.
    But also at times it goes much lower (17MiB/s) . I've seen peaks of 77MiB/s...
    I think it would be better to give you an average transfer rate when it's finished.

    ETA 19h21m3s for ~3,4TB

    Not bad at all

    Kinda the same as my experience with the box. Files are migrated via SCP from Finland. I don't have many files, just around 600GB or so. iirc final transfer speed averaging around 28MiB/s.

    All in all very satisfied considering the price. And should be even better once everyone has settled in.

    Thanked by 2remy host_c
  • remyremy Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @remy said:

    @sh97 said:
    @remy curious how much speeds are you getting with rsync, and where is the origin server located?
    I was doing SCP from NYC to RO, and it took ~12 hours to move 1TB

    I've just started the migration.
    The source server is located in Germany

    There are a lot of parameters that can vary the result.... but here are some of my statistics ;) For what it is worth

    For the moment, I'm transferring at a speed of 45.265 MiB/s.
    But also at times it goes much lower (17MiB/s) . I've seen peaks of 77MiB/s...
    I think it would be better to give you an average transfer rate when it's finished.

    ETA 19h21m3s for ~3,4TB

    Not bad at all

    I use WinSCP (with background threads processing),
    the cpu % load is under 10%, most of the time under 6%

    6% / 10% CPU usage to transfer files at 50 Mb/s with an encryption layer?
    That doesn't sound like much to me, unless you're transferring unencrypted via FTP. And even then!

    I don't know how optimized rclone is, since I'm literally bombarding the cpu. Probably not that optimized. :#

    Still, I'm surprised by your numbers

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • @sliix said:

    @remy said:

    @sh97 said:
    @remy curious how much speeds are you getting with rsync, and where is the origin server located?
    I was doing SCP from NYC to RO, and it took ~12 hours to move 1TB

    I've just started the migration.
    The source server is located in Germany

    There are a lot of parameters that can vary the result.... but here are some of my statistics ;) For what it is worth

    For the moment, I'm transferring at a speed of 45.265 MiB/s.
    But also at times it goes much lower (17MiB/s) . I've seen peaks of 77MiB/s...
    I think it would be better to give you an average transfer rate when it's finished.

    ETA 19h21m3s for ~3,4TB

    Not bad at all

    Kinda the same as my experience with the box. Files are migrated via SCP from Finland. I don't have many files, just around 600GB or so. iirc final transfer speed averaging around 28MiB/s.

    All in all very satisfied considering the price. And should be even better once everyone has settled in.

    Similar experience, I moved just over 900GB from AMS using rsync so not the most optimal and it sat around 28MiB/s the entire time. Very pleased for the price.

    Thanked by 3remy host_c sliix
  • I am good customer, so I don't transfer anything at all

    Thanked by 3remy sh97 host_c
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @Moopah - THX!

    I guess you are still waiting for the IOPS to return? :D

  • MoopahMoopah Member
    edited March 2024

    @host_c said:
    @Moopah - THX!

    I guess you are still waiting for the IOPS to return? :D

    No, I will never transfer anything. It will sit in silence like a good idler should.
    I am respectful customer

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 2024

    @remy said:

    6% / 10% CPU usage to transfer files at 50 Mb/s with an encryption layer?
    That doesn't sound like much to me, unless you're transferring unencrypted via FTP. And even then!

    I don't know how optimized rclone is, since I'm literally bombarding the cpu. Probably not that optimized. :#

    Still, I'm surprised by your numbers

    Windows Server OS can be pretty optimized if used properly.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • kendkend Member

    @remy said:

    I don't know how optimized rclone is, since I'm literally bombarding the cpu. Probably not that optimized. :#

    As far as I could remember, rclone wouldn't eat too much CPU resources. It's just a bit too slow when doing daily syncs with a lot of small files. So I moved to kopia for mainly taking care of the daily backups, and rclone for syncing to local backup drives once a month.

    I moved around 300G data with 50k+ files to Host-C with kopia last night, from a DE server, done in 1h40min. Pretty satisfied. Though the CPU usage was kept on above 60%+ last night, maybe mainly due to the backup was done through Tailscale + 12 threads with kopia. I'll test a new backup tonight without using Tailscale.

    Thank you @host_c , very nice offer and very good service so far!

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • Has it already been decided if and when there will be a restock?

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @JellyBrain said:
    Has it already been decided if and when there will be a restock?

    ~ 2 weeks, depending on import and customs.

    Thanked by 1JellyBrain
  • remyremy Member

    @kend said:

    @remy said:

    I don't know how optimized rclone is, since I'm literally bombarding the cpu. Probably not that optimized. :#

    As far as I could remember, rclone wouldn't eat too much CPU resources. It's just a bit too slow when doing daily syncs with a lot of small files. So I moved to kopia for mainly taking care of the daily backups, and rclone for syncing to local backup drives once a month.

    I moved around 300G data with 50k+ files to Host-C with kopia last night, from a DE server, done in 1h40min. Pretty satisfied. Though the CPU usage was kept on above 60%+ last night, maybe mainly due to the backup was done through Tailscale + 12 threads with kopia. I'll test a new backup tonight without using Tailscale.

    Thank you @host_c , very nice offer and very good service so far!

    Strange in my case it's rather cpu-intensive.
    I created a LUKS partition out of habit so this inevitably affects the cpu load a little. But normally, with AES.... The impact on performance is minimal

  • kendkend Member

    @remy said:

    @kend said:

    @remy said:

    I don't know how optimized rclone is, since I'm literally bombarding the cpu. Probably not that optimized. :#

    As far as I could remember, rclone wouldn't eat too much CPU resources. It's just a bit too slow when doing daily syncs with a lot of small files. So I moved to kopia for mainly taking care of the daily backups, and rclone for syncing to local backup drives once a month.

    I moved around 300G data with 50k+ files to Host-C with kopia last night, from a DE server, done in 1h40min. Pretty satisfied. Though the CPU usage was kept on above 60%+ last night, maybe mainly due to the backup was done through Tailscale + 12 threads with kopia. I'll test a new backup tonight without using Tailscale.

    Thank you @host_c , very nice offer and very good service so far!

    Strange in my case it's rather cpu-intensive.
    I created a LUKS partition out of habit so this inevitably affects the cpu load a little. But normally, with AES.... The impact on performance is minimal

    If I remembered the right way, rclone could be a bit cpu-intensive on the source, but should not take too much CPU power on the destination machine.

    Sometimes, when the destination machine's HDD is much too busy, like host-c now might be, the CPU usage could also be higher than usual.

    Thanked by 1remy
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @kend said: Sometimes, when the destination machine's HDD is much too busy, like host-c now might be, the CPU usage could also be higher than usual.

    That is true.

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    ok guys/ladies/gents, bonus round :)

    First 3 that will comment the correct answer to the question, get migrated over Xeon Gold 6130 node

    Question;

    when was "The Hunt for Red October" first released in cinema

  • stxshstxsh Member

    march 1990

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    March 2 1990

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • stxshstxsh Member

    march 2 1990 then lol

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • MoopahMoopah Member
    edited March 2024

    1990 scratch that, I like my current CPU

  • March 2, 1990

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited March 2024

    This movie was initially scheduled for release in December 1989. However, the filmmakers decided to delay the release until March 1990 due to the crowded holiday season and to allow more time for post-production work.

    This decision ultimately proved beneficial, as the film performed well at the box office and received positive reviews upon its release in March.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • sliixsliix Member
    edited March 2024

    Late to the party but anyway
    2nd March 1990 :lol:

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited March 2024

    @stxsh
    @plumberg
    @Xrmaddness

    DM

    @dev_vps +1 for the most precise answer. :D

    @Moopah , are you sure? AVX-512 + memory bandwidth, 119.21 GiB/s VS 76.8 GB/s

    For some applications, instruction set will win over Frequency.

  • @host_c said:
    @stxsh
    @plumberg
    @Xrmaddness

    DM

    @dev_vps +1 for the most precise answer. :D

    @Moopah , are you sure? AVX-512 + memory bandwidth, 119.21 GiB/s VS 76.8 GB/s

    For some applications, instruction set will win over Frequency.

    Congratulations to the winners!!!
    Thanks, @host_c
    Greatly appreciated.

    Thanked by 2host_c stxsh
  • stxshstxsh Member

    @host_c said:
    @stxsh
    @plumberg
    @Xrmaddness

    DM

    @dev_vps +1 for the most precise answer. :D

    @Moopah , are you sure? AVX-512 + memory bandwidth, 119.21 GiB/s VS 76.8 GB/s

    For some applications, instruction set will win over Frequency.

    also, should boost to a higher frequency than an a E5-2690v4 (aka better single core geekbench on yabs :D), let’s see tomorrow.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • Thanks @host_c!

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-03-05                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Mar 30 12:00:18 AM EDT 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2095.076 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 975.0 MiB
    Disk       : 4.9 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-18-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 861
    Multi Core      | 1679
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22360148
    
    Thanked by 1host_c
  • kendkend Member

    @host_c I thought you were share the same time zone as me, but why the nice things always happened during my sleep.

This discussion has been closed.