Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

-- B L A C K F R I D A Y -- by LETs #1 TOP PROVIDER RackNerd! - HUNDREDS OF GIVEAWAYS! COME GET SOME

1…660661663665666…855

Comments

  • sycotsycot Member

    @MrEd said:
    @dustinc

    nice grab!!

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

  • TrKTrK Member

    Yay, Ed got the last one, congratulations 👏🏻👏🏻

    Thanked by 1MrEd
  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @sycot said:

    @MrEd said:
    @dustinc

    nice grab!!

    Perfect timing... F5 while I can, and when I am back, almost everything is gone :)

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

  • rattlecattlerattlecattle Member

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @sycot said:

    @MrEd said:
    @dustinc

    nice grab!!

    Perfect timing... F5 while I can, and when I am back, almost everything is gone :)

    Mentally strong people do pushups on F5!!

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

    You have are the only live tracker for racknerd threads :D

  • TrKTrK Member

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

  • TrKTrK Member

    Let's go, road to trihexa!! don't tell me the chef is going now!!

  • rattlecattlerattlecattle Member

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

  • TrKTrK Member

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    Well same i have a small vps last year got core upgrade and now the ram, sounds like a perfect fit 😁

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

    You have are the only live tracker for racknerd threads :D

    Well, LET blocked the fun by introducing CF limitations, so had to find workaround for them.

    I already mentioned that Similarity check is a bit off right now, but at least the real stats are correct :)

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

    You have are the only live tracker for racknerd threads :D

    Well, LET blocked the fun by introducing CF limitations, so had to find workaround for them.

    I already mentioned that Similarity check is a bit off right now, but at least the real stats are correct :)

    And guess what, we qre happy with live tracker no pressure for other things 😄

  • OKHaoOKHao Member

    Hi, I would like to double the bandwidth. Order：2272922988
    Thanks!

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Sounds awesome 👍🏻, keep posting the new tracker features and we will hype you some more.

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

    You have are the only live tracker for racknerd threads :D

    Well, LET blocked the fun by introducing CF limitations, so had to find workaround for them.

    I already mentioned that Similarity check is a bit off right now, but at least the real stats are correct :)

    And guess what, we qre happy with live tracker no pressure for other things 😄

    I'm glad I found a quick way to work around the limitations, but really right not I have enough work and problems at work, so don't have time to improve the tracker right now. I guess, if New Year thread pops up, I can implement the improvements there :)

    @dustinc do you plan activity thread then?

  • rattlecattlerattlecattle Member

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Totally make senses.

    If there was an option between additional cores, RAM or perhaps some storage what would you go for?

  • TheBrotherTheBrother Member

    Hello, I would like to double the bandwidth.
    Order Number: 1618786058
    Invoice ID: #9133114

  • TrKTrK Member

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @TrK said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Looks like intentionally left for you!!

    Felt like that :D

    You have are the only live tracker for racknerd threads :D

    Well, LET blocked the fun by introducing CF limitations, so had to find workaround for them.

    I already mentioned that Similarity check is a bit off right now, but at least the real stats are correct :)

    And guess what, we qre happy with live tracker no pressure for other things 😄

    I'm glad I found a quick way to work around the limitations, but really right not I have enough work and problems at work, so don't have time to improve the tracker right now. I guess, if New Year thread pops up, I can implement the improvements there :)

    @dustinc do you plan activity thread then?

    All we can do now is wait, if dustin decides to drop the NY thread it's all good 😊

  • up2uup2u Member

    Hello, I would like to double the bandwidth.
    Order Number: 9046330164

    THANK YOU!

  • alpinyalpiny Member

    Hello, I would like to double the bandwidth.
    Order Number：8194220378
    Invoice ID: #9132190
    Thank you very much!

  • TrKTrK Member

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Totally make senses.

    If there was an option between additional cores, RAM or perhaps some storage what would you go for?

    Storage is always optional and we can even use virtual disks with current technological advancements so it's a fight between Cores and RAM nonetheless.

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Totally make senses.

    If there was an option between additional cores, RAM or perhaps some storage what would you go for?

    Well... depends on the storage amount :) I would like to increase the storage a bit, but I can always mount my home server storage (8TB free there) for anything that might handle high latency :) I would not take 1GB storage over 0.5GB RAM, but 5 or 10 GB storage might make me change the opinion :)

  • toppictoppic Member

    I missed！

  • rattlecattlerattlecattle Member

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Totally make senses.

    If there was an option between additional cores, RAM or perhaps some storage what would you go for?

    Well... depends on the storage amount :) I would like to increase the storage a bit, but I can always mount my home server storage (8TB free there) for anything that might handle high latency :) I would not take 1GB storage over 0.5GB RAM, but 5 or 10 GB storage might make me change the opinion :)

    I see. Yes 5/10 GB of storage as opposed to 0.5GB of RAM would be preferred. I think there was a similar giveaway last year with options of core, ram or storage.

  • TrKTrK Member

    @toppic said:
    I missed！

    We can always hype some more for the giveaways.

  • rattlecattlerattlecattle Member

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @TrK said:

    @rattlecattle said:

    @MrEd said:

    @rattlecattle said:
    yep still one up for grabs.

    Not any more :) Was just switched to a short call at the main moment :)

    Great work! With that all the slots are booked.

    What you gonna choose the core or ram?

    Still not decided but RAM is a dedicated resource while cores aren't. So maybe would go for RAM.

    My logic here is about having balance between the resources. Since I have a VM with 2CPU + 2.5GB, it is already able to handle 2 threads, and I am working on Java mostly, so memory makes sense right now. When I get over 4GB RAM, then introducing a new core might make sense in my use cases. :) So after this GA I will have 2CPU+3GB RAM :)

    Totally make senses.

    If there was an option between additional cores, RAM or perhaps some storage what would you go for?

    Storage is always optional and we can even use virtual disks with current technological advancements so it's a fight between Cores and RAM nonetheless.

    Sure. Which ever works best.

This discussion has been closed.