New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Shared hosting
Hiya providers.
I’m looking shared hosting. With good resources.
In Da/cP + litespeed. With good amount of usage resources and dedicated ip.
I have around 50+ sites with 50k pageview daily.
I’m using SpeedyPage.
enterprise plan (3x the resources + dedicated ip) But it’s not dmca ignored.
I have bunch of movies site with external links for download.
Location anywhere as far as dmca ignored. But good to be EU.
Comments
You only provide ddl link or it is a streaming site (user watch movie on your site) ?
External link to watch/download.
I’m not hosting/stream.
Hello Our brand Quackweb Hosting offers a competitive and reliable service.
Edited: we are not DMCA ignored I didn't read that part
A good host for u would be https://abelohost.com/storage-vps/
grab a cheap VPS, add apache mod reverse proxy to it and point to your speedypage hosting. When DMCA comes it will go to your vps provider. Since no content is hosted there, just ignore it. For this grab a vps in Luxembourg, or other EU or asian locations rather than in U.S. In fact there are some U.S. hosts that don't bother to read DMCA abuse emails at all.
is it possible with litespeed ?
i am talking about the shared hosting, i am done with server managemtn, and sudo/yum
i want peace, i was okay with speedyPage until dmca complain,
DM me for a coupon code
Why?
First, LiteSpeed is no faster than Apache +-10ms
Second dedicated IP gives NO SEO benefit (confirmed by google search central employee). The only reason it's good is if you are building PBN, but then you need separate subnets.
Ahahah.. You say that, because you don't have high load websites. Like streaming videos and content loading.
Apache struggles with that. The difference is the performance in low / medium hardware between apache and litespeed. There are a huge performance from Litespeed rather than Apache.
Definitely agreed. LiteSpeed rocks.