New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
my order number is: 6985825560, Thank you.
Me too
Order #7475213273
The offer came in just right when I need a storage VPS! Placed an order #6430653159!
Order #5482614154
Polar Bear.
I installed LAMP and emailwiz on it.
Order #2000239255
is servarica ignore DMCA ?
wow
having the Polar Bear since 2020, enjoooy
I have used shared hosting all my life and I am new to this entire VPS/dedicated server thing. I have some queries:
I am interested in Opossum 1 Storage VPS BF Special OR Opossum 2 Storage VPS BF Special OR Polar Bear Storage Offer.
I am confused because of the word Storage.
If I get any of the above mentioned servers:
Please clear my doubt. Thanks
Any server with dedicated cpu cores?
No , we handle any copyright complaint we receive
Swordfish SSD Storage 2 is dedicated
https://clients.servarica.com/store/ssd-plans/swordfish-ssd-storage-2
Also NVMe Cheetah 3 is dedicated
https://clients.servarica.com/store/nvme-plans
these are normal VPS you can host and do anything you do with any server as long as the resources are enough for it
We just name it storage so that the users know it has a lot of storage and for SEO reasons
We dont restrict storage VPS to be used for cold backups actually we encourage you to use it to the max you can use it for
Thanks
I use Polar Bear for NextCloud without issues. yes, "storage servers" have a lot of storage (e.g. 2TB) but can also be used to run standard applications.
I have run a gitlab-alike on a Polar Bear without issue. They're quite reasonable VPSes.
I like this provider, but had to cancel because I needed a Canadian ip address which I could never get. I'll try again another time.
Lol. Seriously? They are from Canada and they are hosted in Canada. And you are saying the IPs are not geolocated to Canada? Damn.
As they said they had to acquire more IPs to hand out with these offers. IP located where wanted now but geolocation databases take time to show change (https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3554228/#Comment_3554228)
Hani posted that they were able to try to recycle old IPs as people canceled, if a ticket was opened, but it may take a few days.
Sadly this is the reality of IPv4 exhaustion, and why we all need to be demanding IPv6 from our providers and speaking loudly with our wallets.
Most home ISPs around the world provide IPv6 connectivity now. Facebook actually now offers degraded service on IPv4 as some features are now IPv6-only.
Being afraid of letters and extra dots in addresses is kind of silly when we can have providers procure a full IPv4 internet's worth of addresses these days.
IPs moving around is not a world that geolocation providers were meant to handle. This is why they never bothered handling like cell companies moving their allocations around as NATs moved around once they got rid of per-user IPs in the late 90s and early 2000s.
@servarica_hani Can I use docker with Disabled VM-x/AMD-V?
My order number is #2823955127 and #5555381811
Thanks
Well I got a new hybrid storage vm and dedicated server with them. I have been downloading my plex collection from all my cold back up sources via btsync. Good speeds overall. Have the disks setup in raid0 for 38tbs of data. Hopefully I have bad boy filled half way through this month
You're just kidding, right? This might not be obvious to everyone.
I'm aware, but I gave it 3 weeks.
@TimboJones Well I’m sorry to state the facts. So if I setup a raid 5 array then it would be lower anyways thanks for your post!
I'm annoyed and inconvenienced replacing a 2TB server and that was backed up. I don't have the man tears available if I were to lose a 38TB server to hardware or human error. But if you have symmetrical gigabit fiber at home, it's probably not much of an issue.
@TimboJones yeah I would probably cry if I lose all that data luckily I’m going to yolo it! Go big or go home!
Heh. Yeah. I just took delivery of a custom build (thanks Hani!) that is currently initializing a 64TB RAID-5. No way I'd want to deal with DR on double-digit terabytes of disks in RAID-0 even if it's "just", shall we say, procured content. And even worse would be if it's what one might call "real" content.
I'm looking to get 64+ TB off my home network in a RAID-0 type scenario. It's just too much headache to handle the slightest error ever happening.
With a performant caching layer, a RAID-5 should perform reasonably well. I should have a big, in-depth post in a couple weeks about how I'm handling that though.
Hani has the 30K foot view, but I think the low-end community would be very well served by a write-up of what I'm doing with this array and why (in terms of decisions I've made for filesystem, caching, etc.).