Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

OFFICIAL B-L-A-C-K-F-R-I-D-A-Y THREAD -- COMMUNITY ENDORSED! Take a peek! (RackNerd's Black Friday)

1…909910912914915…1117

Comments

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @MrEd said:

    Yeah, its really hard to use up the bandwidth... The VM I won and now hosts the stats page has used 20.5 GB of 2.9 TB during the last 8 days (I am already impressed, that so much traffic is going there). GZIP is enabled, I know that the chart is almost 3MB already, but gzipped its only 217kB... One page load is only 18kB from the server, all other stuff is from external hosts (images, js, css)...

    My scraper and website has used 13.87GB over the past month, and that's not including the other things I run on it!

    Is it really the chart that uses so much bandwidth? :) I didn't check the logs really if users use it so much or not :)

  • sonusonu Member

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    If RN allowed torrents etc, that would’ve made sense especially for those from countries with strict censorship. I think most people ask for it because it’s free

    I think RN allows BT.

  • VoidVoid Member

    @MrEd said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MrEd said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    People refreshing nonstop for new giveaways lol

    Hmm, my prediction that we would reach 2.5M views on Friday is still on track... ;)

    Psttt... I don't know if you are also using the json for your stats page, but... I have a feeling, that json view is also counting to the total views. That would mean... we could run an infinite loop on all idling servers and could quickly increase the view count :)

    Anyway it’s pretty easy to manipulate the view count if someone really wants to.

    But manipulation can only be done one way :) You can't reduce the counter :D

    True can’t reduce but if increasing is the only goal then it should be ok

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @MrEd said:

    Is it really the chart that uses so much bandwidth? :) I didn't check the logs really if users use it so much or not :)

    The chart uses 217kB which you mentioned, but if you really want, you can optimize it and not include user avatar, should save you another few kB haha

  • VoidVoid Member

    @MrEd said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    Yeah, its really hard to use up the bandwidth... The VM I won and now hosts the stats page has used 20.5 GB of 2.9 TB during the last 8 days (I am already impressed, that so much traffic is going there). GZIP is enabled, I know that the chart is almost 3MB already, but gzipped its only 217kB... One page load is only 18kB from the server, all other stuff is from external hosts (images, js, css)...

    How many hits per day ?

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @jmaxwell said:
    True can’t reduce but if increasing is the only goal then it should be ok

    What if I want to slowly subtract the view count, to make it seem like we're advancing but very very slowly? 😈

  • VoidVoid Member

    @sonu said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    If RN allowed torrents etc, that would’ve made sense especially for those from countries with strict censorship. I think most people ask for it because it’s free

    I think RN allows BT.

    Private trackers maybe? Anyway not according to the AUP for sure.

  • VoidVoid Member

    @jmaxwell said:

    @sonu said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    If RN allowed torrents etc, that would’ve made sense especially for those from countries with strict censorship. I think most people ask for it because it’s free

    I think RN allows BT.

    Private trackers maybe? Anyway not according to the AUP for sure.

    Prohibited Activities (Not Allowed):

    - Copyright Infringement and DMCA

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @MrEd said:

    Is it really the chart that uses so much bandwidth? :) I didn't check the logs really if users use it so much or not :)

    The chart uses 217kB which you mentioned, but if you really want, you can optimize it and not include user avatar, should save you another few kB haha

    My idea was to show the icon above each bar in the chart, then the chart would be much cooler, but it didn't work out with chartjs, so scrapped this idea (for now, maybe future iterations of the page [I am pretty sure RN will host a new spam thread again] I will find out the way). So yes, some bandwidth would get a lot smaller, but still, thinking about 18+217kB (lets say every refresh also loads the chart) is only 235kB, and I have already used up 20GB... Ok, initial setup, lets drop 2GB... Ok, lets drop 5GB... Still, 15GB... That would be 60k views during 8 days... Do you guys really refresh so much on the stats page?

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @jmaxwell said:

    Prohibited Activities (Not Allowed):

    - Copyright Infringement and DMCA

    So as long as the content isn't DMCA/copyrighted, right?

  • VoidVoid Member
    edited November 2022

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    Prohibited Activities (Not Allowed):

    - Copyright Infringement and DMCA

    So as long as the content isn't DMCA/copyrighted, right?

    Yes. But mostly everything interesting on public trackers are pirated stuff that are DMCA magnets

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @jmaxwell said:
    True can’t reduce but if increasing is the only goal then it should be ok

    What if I want to slowly subtract the view count, to make it seem like we're advancing but very very slowly? 😈

    It depends... Logical way would be to use long for storing the views count. Then you would need to have somewhere 2^64 requests in a short period of time to deal with long overflow :D I guess, LET server, even if it would be the best dedi possible, would not handle that much :D

  • sonusonu Member

    @jmaxwell said:

    @sonu said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    If RN allowed torrents etc, that would’ve made sense especially for those from countries with strict censorship. I think most people ask for it because it’s free

    I think RN allows BT.

    Private trackers maybe? Anyway not according to the AUP for sure.

    Have you ever downloaded any DMCA-protected files? I don't RN care about that unless they got the report/

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @MrEd said:

    My idea was to show the icon above each bar in the chart, then the chart would be much cooler, but it didn't work out with chartjs, so scrapped this idea (for now, maybe future iterations of the page [I am pretty sure RN will host a new spam thread again] I will find out the way). So yes, some bandwidth would get a lot smaller, but still, thinking about 18+217kB (lets say every refresh also loads the chart) is only 235kB, and I have already used up 20GB... Ok, initial setup, lets drop 2GB... Ok, lets drop 5GB... Still, 15GB... That would be 60k views during 8 days... Do you guys really refresh so much on the stats page?

    60k views is a lot, maybe something's a bit off? My site has only gotten 178 views haha

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @jmaxwell said:
    Yes. But mostly everything interesting on public trackers are pirated stuff that are DMCA magnets

    I see, yeah makes sense.

  • sonusonu Member

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    Prohibited Activities (Not Allowed):

    - Copyright Infringement and DMCA

    So as long as the content isn't DMCA/copyrighted, right?

    As long as they don't find you, or care about that.

  • MooCowGalaxyMooCowGalaxy Member

    @MrEd said:

    It depends... Logical way would be to use long for storing the views count. Then you would need to have somewhere 2^64 requests in a short period of time to deal with long overflow :D I guess, LET server, even if it would be the best dedi possible, would not handle that much :D

    LET server handled BF/CM really well, so it must be able to handle 2^64 requests at once right? 😆

  • lazyskillzlazyskillz Member

    Can I get double bandwidth too? Invoice 4964749

    Thanks dudes!

  • DeadlyChemistDeadlyChemist Member

    Im still here
    This weekend i'll post the tools, was thinking to make a full detailed video but no clue where my.mic cable is :/

  • sonusonu Member

    @DeadlyChemist said:
    Im still here
    This weekend i'll post the tools, was thinking to make a full detailed video but no clue where my.mic cable is :/

    Your cable is at
    Amazon.com

  • DeadlyChemistDeadlyChemist Member

    @sonu said:

    @DeadlyChemist said:
    Im still here
    This weekend i'll post the tools, was thinking to make a full detailed video but no clue where my.mic cable is :/

    Your cable is at
    Amazon.com

    Not paying another 20€
    Nor have another 20€..

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @MrEd said:

    My idea was to show the icon above each bar in the chart, then the chart would be much cooler, but it didn't work out with chartjs, so scrapped this idea (for now, maybe future iterations of the page [I am pretty sure RN will host a new spam thread again] I will find out the way). So yes, some bandwidth would get a lot smaller, but still, thinking about 18+217kB (lets say every refresh also loads the chart) is only 235kB, and I have already used up 20GB... Ok, initial setup, lets drop 2GB... Ok, lets drop 5GB... Still, 15GB... That would be 60k views during 8 days... Do you guys really refresh so much on the stats page?

    60k views is a lot, maybe something's a bit off? My site has only gotten 178 views haha

    Yep, something is off... One page load with the chart is 6 requests to my server.

    wc -l access.log.1
627 access.log.1

    Its like 100 views yesterday. So I guess, I have a bit more views than you have, but still, nowhere near 60k views in 8 days :)

  • VoidVoid Member

    @DeadlyChemist said:
    Im still here
    This weekend i'll post the tools, was thinking to make a full detailed video but no clue where my.mic cable is :/

    Very annoying indeed

  • VoidVoid Member

    @sonu said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @sonu said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @MooCowGalaxy said:

    @sonu said:

    Master of numbers.

    How many of them could use all of the bandwidth?

    I will ask for double once I submit the assignments, I will not use the bandwidth, or even the sever, but I will ask for it. :wink:

    Yeah, I wonder how many people actually utilize the extra bandwidth haha
    I haven't even gotten to 10% of my BW limit!

    If RN allowed torrents etc, that would’ve made sense especially for those from countries with strict censorship. I think most people ask for it because it’s free

    I think RN allows BT.

    Private trackers maybe? Anyway not according to the AUP for sure.

    Have you ever downloaded any DMCA-protected files? I don't RN care about that unless they got the report/

    Getting report is the problem. Otherwise who cares. I got a few copyright notices forwarded to me by other providers

  • VoidVoid Member

    Back to silence again…

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @jmaxwell said:
    Back to silence again…

    Thats how it goes these days... :(

  • VoidVoid Member
    edited November 2022

    @MrEd said:

    @jmaxwell said:
    Back to silence again…

    Thats how it goes these days... :(

    Well
    I’ll post some facts and jokes occasionally to keep it alive

  • frozfroz Member

    @jmaxwell said:

    @froz said:
    Nice @MooCowGalaxy I was able to use my prize on more ryzen cores!

    Yabs before and after ?

    Yabs Before: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3548908/#Comment_3548908

    Yabs After:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2022-11-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed Nov 30 08:22:45 AM UTC 2022

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 48 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.872 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.4 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 22.5 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
Kernel     : 5.15.0-53-generic

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 405.41 MB/s (101.3k) | 1.74 GB/s    (27.2k)
Write      | 406.48 MB/s (101.6k) | 1.75 GB/s    (27.4k)
Total      | 811.90 MB/s (202.9k) | 3.50 GB/s    (54.7k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.67 GB/s     (3.2k) | 1.66 GB/s     (1.6k)
Write      | 1.76 GB/s     (3.4k) | 1.77 GB/s     (1.7k)
Total      | 3.44 GB/s     (6.7k) | 3.44 GB/s     (3.3k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 145 Mbits/sec   | 336 Mbits/sec   | 134 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 137 Mbits/sec   | 240 Mbits/sec   | 137 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 449 Mbits/sec   | 558 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 164 Mbits/sec   | 216 Mbits/sec   | 230 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 606 Mbits/sec   | 515 Mbits/sec   | 60.5 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 815 Mbits/sec   | 822 Mbits/sec   | 33.9 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 840 Mbits/sec   | 844 Mbits/sec   | 7.41 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1187
Multi Core      | 2225
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18978936
    Thanked by 1Void
  • BlazinDimesBlazinDimes Member

    Thanked by 3Xrmaddness DeadlyChemist dustinc
  • VoidVoid Member

    @froz said:

    @jmaxwell said:

    @froz said:
    Nice @MooCowGalaxy I was able to use my prize on more ryzen cores!

    Yabs before and after ?

    Yabs Before: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3548908/#Comment_3548908

    Yabs After:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2022-11-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed Nov 30 08:22:45 AM UTC 2022

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 48 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 3792.872 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.4 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 22.5 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
Kernel     : 5.15.0-53-generic

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 405.41 MB/s (101.3k) | 1.74 GB/s    (27.2k)
Write      | 406.48 MB/s (101.6k) | 1.75 GB/s    (27.4k)
Total      | 811.90 MB/s (202.9k) | 3.50 GB/s    (54.7k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.67 GB/s     (3.2k) | 1.66 GB/s     (1.6k)
Write      | 1.76 GB/s     (3.4k) | 1.77 GB/s     (1.7k)
Total      | 3.44 GB/s     (6.7k) | 3.44 GB/s     (3.3k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 145 Mbits/sec   | 336 Mbits/sec   | 134 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 137 Mbits/sec   | 240 Mbits/sec   | 137 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 449 Mbits/sec   | 558 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 164 Mbits/sec   | 216 Mbits/sec   | 230 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 606 Mbits/sec   | 515 Mbits/sec   | 60.5 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 815 Mbits/sec   | 822 Mbits/sec   | 33.9 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 840 Mbits/sec   | 844 Mbits/sec   | 7.41 ms

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1187
Multi Core      | 2225
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18978936

    Ok looks pretty good

This discussion has been closed.