New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
Home: everything through a PiHole that in turn talks to my ISP's DNS servers as they have a track record wrt providing an unfiltered connection (I'll do my own filtering, ta!).
Laptop (when away from home): 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 by default, then PiHole when connected to my VPN. I keep thinking I've got enough RAM on there to run PiHole in a tiny VM, then it can have that stalking protection without the VPN, but I've not got around to trying that.
Phone: currently whatever my provider offers, unless on home wireless. I must get around to putting the VPN on it (though I never got around to that at all on the handset this one has just replaced).
+1 for Simple DNSCrypt. I've been using it for a while with Quad9. Only con for me is it delays internet connectivity by about 10 seconds on bootup but doesn't matter. I rather have a good setup than the defaults.
I wouldn’t use CloudFlare had they not gone through an external audit.
https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/slt3lc6tev37/5xlHCvvNBrvrIoWbuk1vTy/e1058b0d366adf4e983aef99a6ed2a1f/Cloudflare_1.1.1.1_Public_Resolver_Report_-03302020__2.pdf
https://blog.cloudflare.com/announcing-the-results-of-the-1-1-1-1-public-dns-resolver-privacy-examination/
CloudFlare, the one from ZeroTrust.
From nextdns.io site:
Nice! Easy for testing stuffs.
This.
My ISP knows the best DNS for me to get the best speedtest.net results.
I think we're witnessing LET's newest bromance blooming!
I always set my devices to CloudFlare first, Google second. More reliable than any ISP default servers, and lower latency than any others. I don't care about private/anonymous DNS queries or blocking ads via DNS on my personal devices.
Hey, is CloudFlare warp for DNS a VPN? A quick google search and I see this.
Another site says this.
From CloudFlare
Is your data encrypted or exposed, what is the truth? I know my IP becomes masked if I was to use CloudFlare warp for DNS, which makes me feel like I am on a VPN and speeds are rather instantaneous.
This is a great question, and a problem that I worked on a few years ago. My goal at the time was to optimize DNS performance on our home network.
Like @TimboJones, the router/firewall provides DNS and DHCP services for our home network. Everything inside the LAN uses the router as the DNS server and DNS forwarder. The problem I worked on is where to point the router for forwarding DNS queries.
The OP asked about PC/Laptop and my primary personal computer is a laptop. My laptop is configured with multiple "Locations." Each Location uses only one physical interface and disables all other interfaces for security.
Here are the locations I have now:
Some years ago, I worked on this problem:
-> Which public DNS servers are "best" for forwarding DNS queries from our home LAN?
My choices included the DNS servers offered by our ISP's DHCP server. They also included lists of popular fast public DNS services from companies such as NTT, Hurricane Electric, OpenDNS (now owned by Cisco), etc. I also added the well-known Google (8.8.8.8, 4.4.4.4) and the more recent Cloudflare (1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1) public DNS servers.
Another consideration is privacy. How do companies like Google use the DNS query data that they collect? How do they correlate it with other user activities? I cannot answer these questions, but it is a concern of mine. In addition, be aware that some public DNS servers filter results for "family friendly" or other security purposes, which may be useful to some people. We don't have children on our home LAN at present, so I prefer unfiltered results.
I used Steve Gibson's DNS benchmark tool to assess DNS performance. I used the results to help me choose DNS servers for my router. Please note that this is a Windows executable:
https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
Here are a few observations and issues that I have encountered over the years:
My router/firewall accepts the first response no matter what, even if it is wrong or "not-found." It sucked when I was moving domains and servers. The fastest responding DNS server may be the last server to get a DNS change propagated to it.
Which forwarders do I use? I am looking at my router/firewall right now, and here are the settings, probably unchanged from around 2014:
1. x.ns.gin.ntt.net (129.250.35.250)
1a. y.ns.gin.ntt.net (129.250.35.251)
2. ordns.he.net (74.82.42.42)
3. (Deleted - probably no longer public or too slow.)
4. (Deleted - probably no longer public or too slow.)
5. Cloudflare (1.1.1.1)
Spectrum Internet provides DNS for its ISP customers of course. I do not know whether they can be used by the public. Here are the current DNS addresses that are assigned. They have not changed in several years:
209.18.47.63
209.18.47.62
Currently, the checkbox "Use forwarders assigned by ISP" setting is disabled on my router, so I am using only the public ones (NTT, HE, Cloudflare) I listed above. Sometimes I enable the checkbox to see if the internet "feels faster". It doesn't.
I hope this wall of info helps someone, especially the OP.
The fastest would be an inhouse DNS server, the next best I could think of was one that was caching POST requests at the edge on Cloudflare and using DoH. A note about DoH, with caching and 307 or 308 redirects I did have some SSL certificates get mixed up (Somehow Google tried to use a Facebook certificate)
Thank you for mentioning nextdns
Did not know about it before.
I made an account and its very good in terms of simplicity of
1. Allowing or blocking any domain
2. Applying Blocklist (i.e., tracker/ad blocklist)
3. See the various urls in logs to check internet activity
Thank you again

Cloudflare.
I use the combination. According to DNS Jumper software I use to allot IP for my home router.. For my country 8.8.4.4 has less than 15ms and 1.0.0.1 less than 30ms resolve time than their same counterparts 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.1 which are 97ms (Google), and 255ms (CF) respectively. IDK why same DNS resolver with primary IP have higher resolve time than the secondary IP. May be the traffic/congestion is low on secondary IPs?
P.S. I also tried HE DNS, its resolve time is 200ms+ but after initial connecting time/resolve time the site/pages load super fast on this DNS IP. Seems no one is using HE in my country? Thats why the pipe is empty and fast?
I run a VPS near my country with Pi-Hole, Unbound and Wireguard installed. Then I use a GL.iNet router with wireguard and kill-switch enabled. Almost as good as my native connection with my own customized DNS settings running.
i use dnscrypt on my router which is running openwrt
I use Google DNS for my PC
Vps with wireguard using 149.112.112.112 (quad9), 84.200.69.80 (dns.watch).
1.1.1.1 everywhere.
Own VPNs and Exitlag.
https://github.com/hjk789/NXEnhanced
NextDNS must have.
Useful stuff for nextdns users
Thank you for sharing
same