Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HAZI.ro | 25% LIFETIME VPS/VDS Servers | Extra IPs 0.75€/mo

FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep
edited July 2022 in Offers

Hello, dear community!

We offer a 25% recurring discount for all virtual private & dedicated servers if you use the discount code SUMMER-SUN (Other servers available on our website).

VDS - 2vCPU - 4GB RAM - 120GB SSD Enterprise

  • 2x Dedicated vCPUs 2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz
  • 4GB RAM DDR4 ECC 2133MHz
  • 120GB SSD Enterprise RAID10
  • 1Gbps Connection (Shared)
  • Unlimited Monthly Traffic (10TB @1Gbps then Unlimited @100MBps)
  • Voxility 1Tbps AntiDDoS Protection
  • Price: 5.25 EUR/mo
  • Purchase it here

KVM RO-1CPU-6GB-2x300GB

  • 1x vCPU 2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz (1/2 Dedicated)
  • 6GB RAM DDR4 ECC 2133MHz
  • 2x 300GB Seagate Enterprise 7200rpm
  • 1Gbps Connection (10Gbps Shared)
  • Unlimited Monthly Traffic (10TB @1Gbps then Unlimited @100MBps)
  • Voxility 1Tbps AntiDDoS Protection
  • Price: 6.75 EUR/mo
  • Purchase it here

Physical servers:

Server 1:

  • CPU: 2x E5-2698 V3 32 Cores / 64 Threads (2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz)
  • Memory: 16x 16GB RAM DDR4 ECC 2133MHz
  • Storage SSD: 2x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB + 2x Samsung PM893 Enterprise 1.92TB + 44TB SATA Enterprise 7200rpm (12 Drives)
  • Network: 1x 10Gbps
  • Protection: Voxility 1Tbps AntiDDoS

Server 2:

  • CPU: 2x E5-2699 V3 36 Cores / 72 Threads (2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz)
  • Memory: 12x 16GB RAM DDR4 ECC 2133MHz
  • Storage SSD: 4x Samsung PM893 Enterprise 1.92TB
  • Network: 4x 1Gbps
  • Protection: Voxility 1Tbps AntiDDoS

Service features:

  • Dedicated Physical Thread per vCPU
  • KVM Virtualization
  • NoVNC Console Access
  • Integrated Control Panel
  • 1-click Operating System Installation
  • Intrusion Prevention System
  • Intrusion Detection System

Operating Systems:

  • CentOS 7 64bits
  • CentOS 8 64bits
  • CentOS 9 64bits
  • Debian 9 64bits
  • Debian 10 64bits
  • Debian 11 64bits
  • Ubuntu 18.04 64bits
  • Ubuntu 20.04 64bits
  • Ubuntu 22.04 64bits
  • FreeBSD 12.x 32bits
  • FreeBSD 12.x 64bits
  • FreeBSD 13.x 32bits
  • FreeBSD 13.x 64bits

Useful information:

Looking Glass: Click here
Terms & Conditions: Click here
Accetable Usage Policy: Click here
Privacy Policy: Click here

Accepted payment methods:

  • MobilPay (Visa / Maestro / Mastercard)
  • Paysafecard
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • USD Coin
  • Dogecoin
  • Litecoin
  • Dai
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Bank Transfer
«13

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.
    A single "abuse", including zero day attack that is not your fault, causes service deletion with 30-minute notice and no second chances.

    Also, IPv6 and push-up payment method are missing.

  • @yoursunny said:
    A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.
    A single "abuse", including zero day attack that is not your fault, causes service deletion with 30-minute notice and no second chances.

    Also, IPv6 and push-up payment method are missing.

    Thanks for the heads-up.

  • bulbasaurbulbasaur Member
    edited July 2022

    @yoursunny said: A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.

    The original complaint thread seems to have had a negative effect on your "brotherhood."

    Thanked by @FlorinMarian

    I don't think you know what thanking a post really means.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @stevewatson301 said:

    @yoursunny said: A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.

    The original complaint thread seems to have had a negative effect on your "brotherhood."

    Thanked by @FlorinMarian

    I don't think you know what thanking a post really means.

    Being frustrated isn't a good choice when doing business.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @stevewatson301 said:

    @yoursunny said: A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.

    The original complaint thread seems to have had a negative effect on your "brotherhood."

    Nigh Sect, destroying brotherhood since 2021.

  • spiritysdxspiritysdx Barred
    edited July 2022

    @yoursunny said:
    A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.
    A single "abuse", including zero day attack that is not your fault, causes service deletion with 30-minute notice and no second chances.

    Also, IPv6 and push-up payment method are missing.

    You are right, He said that I abnormally requested the IP 221.179.155.161

  • @spiritysdx said:

    @yoursunny said:
    A single YABS triggers "permanent mitigation" that your network speed would decrease to less than 20 Mbps.
    A single "abuse", including zero day attack that is not your fault, causes service deletion with 30-minute notice and no second chances.

    Also, IPv6 and push-up payment method are missing.

    You are right, this also includes using speedtest's CLI for speed testing, which is also not allowed. At present, my server has been permanently suspended and my account cannot be used.

    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    Thanked by 1spiritlhl
  • @riofredinand said:
    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    He said I was wrong, that IP address is not the IP address of speedtest. My confirmation was wrong. I queried the detailed data of the IP. It was generated by mobile phone traffic. I have not requested this address in my memory, and I have no way of knowing the reason for the request.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2022

    Let me know which SpeedTest CLI sends via NMAP 72 ping requests per second.
    https://pastebin.com/ewWcpRJz

  • @riofredinand said:
    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    I'm talking to customer service on a ticket and waiting for the final result.

  • @spiritysdx said:

    @riofredinand said:
    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    He said I was wrong, that IP address is not the IP address of speedtest. My confirmation was wrong. I queried the detailed data of the IP. It was generated by mobile phone traffic. I have not requested this address in my memory, and I have no way of knowing the reason for the request.

    From your previous thread:

    Then I use lxd to virtualize 6 small lxc containers on the server for my friends to use, and they will use python or golang to write scripts on them for testing.

    Maybe your friends got your server compromised. Maybe your friends did the requesting. Who knows?

  • @FlorinMarian said:
    Let me know which SpeedTest CLI sends via NMAP 72 ping requests per second.
    https://pastebin.com/ewWcpRJz

    I was asking for the specific time of the request for investigation. I ran the speedtest program in the first hour of getting the server to measure the speed, and the follow-up information was followed up in the work order.

  • @NoComment said:

    @spiritysdx said:

    @riofredinand said:
    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    He said I was wrong, that IP address is not the IP address of speedtest. My confirmation was wrong. I queried the detailed data of the IP. It was generated by mobile phone traffic. I have not requested this address in my memory, and I have no way of knowing the reason for the request.

    From your previous thread:

    Then I use lxd to virtualize 6 small lxc containers on the server for my friends to use, and they will use python or golang to write scripts on them for testing.

    Maybe your friends got your server compromised. Maybe your friends did the requesting. Who knows?

    I didn't use lxc to virtualize anything this time.

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @spiritysdx said:

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Let me know which SpeedTest CLI sends via NMAP 72 ping requests per second.
    https://pastebin.com/ewWcpRJz

    I was asking for the specific time of the request for investigation. I ran the speedtest program in the first hour of getting the server to measure the speed, and the follow-up information was followed up in the work order.

    Time is on first column on that pastebin 19:17:32.microseconds

  • @FlorinMarian said:
    Time is on first column on that pastebin 19:17:32.microseconds

    UTC?

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @spiritysdx said:

    @FlorinMarian said:
    Time is on first column on that pastebin 19:17:32.microseconds

    UTC?

    UTC+2 [RO local time]

  • 25% off isn’t the 40% off you are specifying

  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    @corbpie said:
    25% off isn’t the 40% off you are specifying

    Oh..God!
    I forgot to replace percent (replaced only URLs + Product price from old thread).
    I'll be happy if someone from Moderation Team can edit that percent for me.
    Thank you!

  • NoCommentNoComment Member
    edited July 2022

    @spiritysdx said:

    @NoComment said:

    @spiritysdx said:

    @riofredinand said:
    Great you successfully stop me. I assume it's pay to close.

    He said I was wrong, that IP address is not the IP address of speedtest. My confirmation was wrong. I queried the detailed data of the IP. It was generated by mobile phone traffic. I have not requested this address in my memory, and I have no way of knowing the reason for the request.

    From your previous thread:

    Then I use lxd to virtualize 6 small lxc containers on the server for my friends to use, and they will use python or golang to write scripts on them for testing.

    Maybe your friends got your server compromised. Maybe your friends did the requesting. Who knows?

    I didn't use lxc to virtualize anything this time.

    If you are sure you didn't do this and @FlorinMarian didn't mistake you for someone else, then congrats. You got yourself compromised in less than a day. Most likely, you are running some script you shouldn't be running.

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @FlorinMarian said:

    @corbpie said:
    25% off isn’t the 40% off you are specifying

    Oh..God!
    I forgot to replace percent (replaced only URLs + Product price from old thread).
    I'll be happy if someone from Moderation Team can edit that percent for me.
    Thank you!

    :+1:

  • spiritysdxspiritysdx Barred
    edited July 2022

    Here's a link to what I did in the first few hours I got the server, I'll list it here
    https://hub.docker.com/r/peer2profit/peer2profit_x86_64
    https://hub.docker.com/r/traffmonetizer/cli
    https://github.com/zq/superspeed
    If you say I did something before that time period that caused the abnormal request, it could only be caused by one of the above links.

    EDIT: Should also add https://github.com/zhanghanyun/backtrace, that's why that IP is being requested.

  • At the time you mentioned, I only got the machine for about an hour and a half. I actually only performed the operation in the first hour of getting the server, and the subsequent operation was 6~7 hours later.

  • @spiritysdx said:
    Here's a link to what I did in the first few hours I got the server, I'll list it here
    https://hub.docker.com/r/peer2profit/peer2profit_x86_64
    https://hub.docker.com/r/traffmonetizer/cli
    https://github.com/zq/superspeed
    If you say I did something before that time period that caused the abnormal request, it could only be caused by one of the above links.

    Dude, I'm not even gonna bother. That looks like traffic exchange and I am not surprised your previous provider kicked you out.

    This guy's previous thread should be updated to mention that he was probably running traffic exchange so it's fair to the provider.

    Thanked by 1bulbasaur
  • Well, it looks like the cause of everything is me.

  • @spiritysdx said:
    Well, it looks like the cause of everything is me.

    It certainly is. A lesson to learn.

  • @NoComment said:

    @spiritysdx said:
    Here's a link to what I did in the first few hours I got the server, I'll list it here
    https://hub.docker.com/r/peer2profit/peer2profit_x86_64
    https://hub.docker.com/r/traffmonetizer/cli
    https://github.com/zq/superspeed
    If you say I did something before that time period that caused the abnormal request, it could only be caused by one of the above links.

    Dude, I'm not even gonna bother. That looks like traffic exchange and I am not surprised your previous provider kicked you out.

    This guy's previous thread should be updated to mention that he was probably running traffic exchange so it's fair to the provider.

    I checked it again, He said that I abnormally requested the IP 221.179.155.161 , I checked that this address is indeed the speed measurement address of speedtest, so it is not caused by traffic exchange, it is caused by the speed measurement I performed speedtest, related The IP information will be pasted later.

  • https://github.com/zhanghanyun/backtrace
    The collection script I used, the script used for backhaul routing, and the address you mentioned in the screenshot.

  • spiritysdxspiritysdx Barred
    edited July 2022

    https://github.com/zhanghanyun/backtrace/blob/main/asn.go
    221.179.155.161

    rIp   = []string{"219.141.136.12", "202.106.50.1", "221.179.155.161", "202.96.209.133", "210.22.97.1", "211.136.112.200", "58.60.188.222", "210.21.196.6", "120.196.165.24"}
     rName = []string{"北京电信", "北京联通", "北京移动", "上海电信", "上海联通", "上海移动", "广州电信", "广州联通", "广州移动"}
     ca    = []color.Attribute{color.FgHiBlue, color.FgHiMagenta, color.FgHiYellow, color.FgHiGreen, color.FgHiCyan, color.FgHiRed, color.FgHiMagenta, color.FgHiYellow, color.FgHiBlue}
     m     = map[string]string{"AS4134": "电信163 [普通线路]", "AS4809": "电信CN2 [优质线路]", "AS4837": "联通4837[普通线路]", "AS9929": "联通9929[优质线路]", "AS9808": "移动CMI [普通线路]", "AS58453": "移动CMI [普通线路]"}
    
  • @spiritysdx said:
    https://github.com/zhanghanyun/backtrace
    The collection script I used, the script used for backhaul routing, and the address you mentioned in the screenshot.

    You are indeed right but at this point it is questionable if @FlorinMarian is happy with traffic exchange customers. It probably isn't a problem with "dedicated cpu" and "unmetered bandwidth" but some providers don't like traffic exchange.

  • spiritysdxspiritysdx Barred
    edited July 2022

    @NoComment said:

    @spiritysdx said:
    https://github.com/zhanghanyun/backtrace
    The collection script I used, the script used for backhaul routing, and the address you mentioned in the screenshot.

    You are indeed right but at this point it is questionable if @FlorinMarian is happy with traffic exchange customers. It probably isn't a problem with "dedicated cpu" and "unmetered bandwidth" but some providers don't like traffic exchange.

    The reason for blocking my server is wrong, and I accept what you say, but I should state the facts. The merchant did not block my server for the reason you said.

Sign In or Register to comment.