Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

In this Discussion

New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Netcup SSD speed difference

adnsadns Member

Hi all!

I read a lot before I bought netcup root server and I realised an interesting difference.

I saw that on older RSs the reachable SSD speeds higher than currently. I saw a lots of YABS and I see that currently maximum is near at

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
Read 43.62 MB/s (10.9k) 486.99 MB/s (7.6k)
Write 43.69 MB/s (10.9k) 489.55 MB/s (7.6k)
Total 87.32 MB/s (21.8k) 976.55 MB/s (15.2k)
Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
------ --- ---- ---- ----
Read 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) 1.55 GB/s (1.5k)
Write 1.69 GB/s (3.3k) 1.65 GB/s (1.6k)
Total 3.30 GB/s (6.4k) 3.20 GB/s (3.1k)

On older benchs, I can see double speeds (near 300 MB/s on 4k, more than 3 GB/s on 64k and near 5--7 GB/s on 512k and 1m).

RS packages are very useful with currently specs and available SSD speeds. But I'm interested in that is it a limitation to keep the quality for all customers?

Comments

  • sanvitsanvit Member

    Well, my current RS is getting slower speed than yours.

    root@netcup-fast-rabbit:~# curl -Ls yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-05-06                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat 14 May 2022 08:34:11 AM CEST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 30 days, 21 hours, 34 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 62.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 2.0 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.4.0-107-generic
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 36.36 MB/s    (9.0k) | 449.14 MB/s   (7.0k)
    Write      | 36.45 MB/s    (9.1k) | 451.50 MB/s   (7.0k)
    Total      | 72.81 MB/s   (18.2k) | 900.64 MB/s  (14.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.07 GB/s     (2.1k) | 1.33 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.13 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.42 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Total      | 2.20 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.76 GB/s     (2.6k)
    

    Some may be on luckier (less crowded) nodes than others. but TBH I think this kind of speed is still enough for most use cases.

  • ZerpyZerpy Member

    Speed differs, so what

Sign In or Register to comment.