All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
VMware / VirtualBox very slow NAT? Any idea why?
rinaldohack
Member
Testing was done on Cyberlynk's Mac Mini 2012 server, on macOS Catalina.
On paper, it has 1Gbps port.
https://www.speedtest.net/result/12701080028
But when I do the same test on a VMware fusion running Ubuntu ... wtf was this?
It's so slow even the page barely load!
Yeaaaaah I gave up.
Even pinging was so bad.
(base) root@rinaldo-server1:~# ping 1.1.1.1 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=170 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=499 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=715 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=1876 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=2705 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=2864 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=2747 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=2446 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=2225 ms ^C --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics --- 11 packets transmitted, 9 received, 18.1818% packet loss, time 10048ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 170.337/1805.191/2863.704/998.751 ms, pipe 3
To add more info : this also happens under VirtualBox and VMware Player, when the host is Windows.
But when the same VM was booted into QEMU on Ubuntu, it wasn't so bad.
What happened?
Comments
Finally was able to run speedtest-cli on that said linux.
for some reason, I added another network adapter, put it as ipv6 only, and the ping went better.
I guess the problem is all in the NAT?
you can try another option,such as Bridge protocol, and test again.
that was literally what I said on the post above. but I only have one ipv4 unfortunately.