New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Review for Hostcram KVM-4G (2 vCore / 4 GB Mem / 80 GB)
This review for KVM-4G VPS from Hostcram @Shakib . This VPS has 2 vCores and 4 GB Memory. It has 80 GB NVMe SSD space.
Configuration:
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (64 Bit) Virt/Kernel : KVM / 5.10.0-8-amd64 CPU Model : 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-11900K @ 3.50GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 3504.000 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache CPU Flags : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled Load Average : 0.00, 0.07, 0.09 Total Space : 68G (1013M ~2% used) Total RAM : 3931 MB (64 MB + 319 MB Buff in use)
Global Speedtest:
Location Upload Download Ping --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nearby 710.22 Mbit/s 865.57 Mbit/s 5.748 ms --------------------------------------------------------------------------- USA, New York (Optimum) 316.63 Mbit/s 162.43 Mbit/s 41.277 ms USA, Chicago (Windstream) 447.62 Mbit/s 435.29 Mbit/s 26.101 ms USA, Dallas (Frontier) 744.28 Mbit/s 906.11 Mbit/s 2.383 ms USA, Miami (Sprint) 288.83 Mbit/s 406.25 Mbit/s 32.962 ms USA, Los Angeles (Windstream) 319.86 Mbit/s 323.54 Mbit/s 42.020 ms UK, London (toob Ltd) 82.39 Mbit/s 149.21 Mbit/s ping error! France, Lyon (SFR) 132.61 Mbit/s 96.79 Mbit/s 118.920 ms Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET) 164.44 Mbit/s 114.21 Mbit/s 124.165 ms Spain, Madrid (MasMovil) 156.14 Mbit/s 108.49 Mbit/s 117.207 ms Italy, Rome (Unidata) 137.31 Mbit/s 68.88 Mbit/s 135.931 ms Russia, Moscow (Rostelecom) 113.79 Mbit/s 62.27 Mbit/s 160.713 ms Israel, Haifa (013Netvision) 15.26 Mbit/s 71.07 Mbit/s 184.048 ms India, New Delhi (Weebo) 2.84 Mbit/s 71.97 Mbit/s 277.529 ms Singapore (FirstMedia) 28.31 Mbit/s 17.05 Mbit/s 219.755 ms Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther) 138.97 Mbit/s 130.32 Mbit/s 149.282 ms Australia, Sydney (Optus) 100.04 Mbit/s 78.39 Mbit/s 199.472 ms RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas) 22.94 Mbit/s 112.68 Mbit/s 279.661 ms Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare) 75.78 Mbit/s 144.63 Mbit/s 151.917 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I executed multiple benchmark tests at different times in four days. My goal was to find variance in the tests as different times, load at the node is likely to be different and that can impact the benchmark tests.
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50)
Mon 27 Sep 2021 09:49:39 AM EDT
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 499.85 MB/s (124.9k) | 4.48 GB/s (70.1k)
Write | 501.17 MB/s (125.2k) | 4.51 GB/s (70.5k)
Total | 1.00 GB/s (250.2k) | 9.00 GB/s (140.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 4.16 GB/s (8.1k) | 488.69 MB/s (477)
Write | 4.38 GB/s (8.5k) | 521.24 MB/s (509)
Total | 8.54 GB/s (16.6k) | 1.00 GB/s (986)
Tue Sep 28 22:42:02 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.06 GB/s (267.4k) | 3.00 GB/s (46.8k)
Write | 1.07 GB/s (268.1k) | 3.01 GB/s (47.1k)
Total | 2.14 GB/s (535.5k) | 6.01 GB/s (94.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.21 GB/s (6.2k) | 1.23 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.38 GB/s (6.6k) | 1.31 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.59 GB/s (12.8k) | 2.54 GB/s (2.4k)
Tue Sep 28 23:24:23 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.05 GB/s (264.0k) | 3.05 GB/s (47.7k)
Write | 1.05 GB/s (264.7k) | 3.06 GB/s (47.9k)
Total | 2.11 GB/s (528.7k) | 6.12 GB/s (95.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.17 GB/s (6.2k) | 1.20 GB/s (1.1k)
Write | 3.34 GB/s (6.5k) | 1.28 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.52 GB/s (12.7k) | 2.49 GB/s (2.4k)
Wed Sep 29 12:48:51 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.14 GB/s (286.9k) | 3.08 GB/s (48.2k)
Write | 1.15 GB/s (287.6k) | 3.10 GB/s (48.5k)
Total | 2.29 GB/s (574.5k) | 6.19 GB/s (96.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.30 GB/s (6.4k) | 1.24 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.48 GB/s (6.7k) | 1.32 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.78 GB/s (13.2k) | 2.56 GB/s (2.5k)
Wed Sep 29 14:00:01 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.27 GB/s (319.4k) | 2.95 GB/s (46.2k)
Write | 1.28 GB/s (320.3k) | 2.97 GB/s (46.4k)
Total | 2.55 GB/s (639.7k) | 5.93 GB/s (92.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.33 GB/s (6.5k) | 1.27 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.50 GB/s (6.8k) | 1.36 GB/s (1.3k)
Total | 6.84 GB/s (13.3k) | 2.64 GB/s (2.5k)
Wed Sep 29 17:01:03 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.44 GB/s (360.6k) | 3.24 GB/s (50.6k)
Write | 1.44 GB/s (361.5k) | 3.25 GB/s (50.9k)
Total | 2.88 GB/s (722.1k) | 6.50 GB/s (101.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.97 GB/s (5.8k) | 1.23 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.13 GB/s (6.1k) | 1.31 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.10 GB/s (11.9k) | 2.55 GB/s (2.4k)
Wed Sep 29 19:03:26 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.22 GB/s (307.2k) | 3.01 GB/s (47.0k)
Write | 1.23 GB/s (308.0k) | 3.02 GB/s (47.3k)
Total | 2.46 GB/s (615.3k) | 6.04 GB/s (94.4k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.11 GB/s (6.0k) | 1.28 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.28 GB/s (6.4k) | 1.36 GB/s (1.3k)
Total | 6.40 GB/s (12.5k) | 2.64 GB/s (2.5k)
Wed Sep 29 22:26:16 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.23 GB/s (307.8k) | 3.02 GB/s (47.2k)
Write | 1.23 GB/s (308.6k) | 3.03 GB/s (47.4k)
Total | 2.46 GB/s (616.4k) | 6.06 GB/s (94.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.97 GB/s (5.8k) | 1.22 GB/s (1.1k)
Write | 3.13 GB/s (6.1k) | 1.30 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.11 GB/s (11.9k) | 2.52 GB/s (2.4k)
Thu Sep 30 16:03:40 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.18 GB/s (295.1k) | 2.92 GB/s (45.6k)
Write | 1.18 GB/s (295.9k) | 2.93 GB/s (45.8k)
Total | 2.36 GB/s (591.0k) | 5.85 GB/s (91.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.07 GB/s (6.0k) | 1.24 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.24 GB/s (6.3k) | 1.32 GB/s (1.2k)
Total | 6.31 GB/s (12.3k) | 2.56 GB/s (2.5k)
Sun Oct 3 20:14:04 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.32 GB/s (331.3k) | 3.06 GB/s (47.9k)
Write | 1.32 GB/s (332.2k) | 3.08 GB/s (48.1k)
Total | 2.65 GB/s (663.6k) | 6.15 GB/s (96.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.09 GB/s (6.0k) | 1.32 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.25 GB/s (6.3k) | 1.41 GB/s (1.3k)
Total | 6.34 GB/s (12.3k) | 2.74 GB/s (2.6k)
Mon Oct 4 20:22:04 UTC 2021
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.29 GB/s (322.6k) | 2.88 GB/s (45.1k)
Write | 1.29 GB/s (323.4k) | 2.90 GB/s (45.3k)
Total | 2.58 GB/s (646.0k) | 5.79 GB/s (90.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.09 GB/s (6.0k) | 1.25 GB/s (1.2k)
Write | 3.26 GB/s (6.3k) | 1.33 GB/s (1.3k)
Total | 6.36 GB/s (12.4k) | 2.58 GB/s (2.5k)
More tests continued in second post
Thanked by 1Shakib
Comments
How's this different to https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/174107/review-for-hostcram-kvm-4g-plan ?
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Tests
Tue Sep 28 22:42:02 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1652 Multi Core | 1706 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10130027 Tue Sep 28 23:24:23 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1600 Multi Core | 2921 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10130407 Wed Sep 29 12:48:51 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1657 Multi Core | 2931 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10140343 Wed Sep 29 14:00:01 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1666 Multi Core | 2941 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10141642 Wed Sep 29 17:01:03 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1646 Multi Core | 2808 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10144668 Wed Sep 29 22:26:16 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1673 Multi Core | 3014 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10150080 Thu Sep 30 16:03:40 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1665 Multi Core | 3037 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10163719 Sun Oct 3 20:14:04 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1642 Multi Core | 2982 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10222339 Sun Oct 3 22:18:59 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1648 Multi Core | 2982 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10223585 Mon Oct 4 20:22:04 UTC 2021 --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1685 Multi Core | 3104 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/10240143The performance is high and consistent. Very smooth.
This is collection of benchmark tests performed multiple times during 3-4 days.
Just innocent additional advertising of this hosting company.
Benchmark Tests were executed 12 times across multiple days. It may provide value to some of the readers.
Do you really wants open a new thread every time to show state of your lace panties? That for a reason.
Assumption (or belief) 2 reviews = 2 extra months?
No sir, I am not looking for any extra free month. I have already got free month last month.
My only intent to show VPS benchmark performance across multiple days. I should have put these resultset in the original thread.
I will be sharing benchmark tests for other providers as well who do not give any extra credit.
Noble pursuit, but then why not update the old post with new BM?
(wonder as I head for coffee to clear my head)
You are absolutely correct. I should have done that. It is an oversight (and a mistake) on my part.
Not sure if admins can merge this thread with the old review one. If it can be done, this will be greatly appreciated. 🙏🏼🙏🏼