New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Anyone miss LittleHappyCloud?
A few years ago, I remember using @AnthonySmith for his LHC service. I suppose the price point wasn't the most profitable as compared to the traditional OpenVZ NAT offerings that are still available. But, it fulfilled a niche. Having the ability to run your own kernel (thus being able to run WireGuard natively instead of the Go implementation) and changing the kernel to suit your needs. I would like to see a comeback of such a service. The downside is that KVM has a higher overhead and thus would be more expensive for the operator to run... I would be okay paying a little more if it means I have better isolation from my neighbors on the host node. What do you all think?
Comments
As of right now, you got 1€ KVM's to buy, plenty of them.
BF is coming up soon, saw 5-6€/y KVM's to buy last year.
So yea.
You're right, I guess the market has become flooded with cheap KVM's lately. Nonetheless, I still think it'd be a good idea for those who don't need dedicated IPv4.
@WebHorizon has KVM NAT service in Warsaw and Singapore.
I still have a box and it works OK.
This product is closed to new orders though.
Hosterlabs has KVM IPv6-only service in Montreal, but the provider more or less deadpooled.
I'm unaware of any other providers offering KVM NAT or KVM IPv6-only.
What @AnthonySmith offered is likely Xen, not LHC.
He put most of his eggs in Xen before switching to KVM.
LHC was his KVM NAT branding if I remember correctly.
We have an IPv6-Only KVM product is in progress, to be added next month.
Thanks to your suggestion on the OGF