New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
I think he has no idea about networking and put everything in the same VLAN. This would allow for great occupancy ratio but some of us know the drawbacks.
89.35.39.x and 188.213.49.x.
Currently it's offline since Oradea went down and still unreachable.
Seeing the networks announced in global bgp routing table seems one step. Maybe others will follow.
According to my information at least some services will came back online in some way and some time.
188.213.134.0/24 NETPROTECT SRL
188.213.49.0/24 SC Parfumuri Femei.com SRL
188.240.208.0/24 NETPROTECT SRL
89.35.39.0/24 SC NETSILVANIA NETWORK SRL
89.45.46.0/24 SC Parfumuri Femei.com SRL
Identification data for NETPROTECT SRL
Company Name NETPROTECT SRL
Fiscal Code 16251009
Registry No. J35/756/2004
EUID ROONRC.J35/756/2004
Date of establishment 2004
Looks like some other owner in Timisoara. Date of establishment is also too old.
That'd also explain why people reported their IP's 'pointing to different servers', basically ARP poisoning/IP theft.
Still, i'm sure he has a lot of dedi's and some had /29's included. I'd have to check his old offer threads to confirm.
Francisco
@Maounique said:
Letitgo.gif.
I did. I just reported some slander and the admin decided to stir the pot instead of removing it or demand for proof. I have no proof Francisco instigated it, but it seems to appear each time he imagines I have something against him. I have nothing against him, I don't like his attitude here, attacking a provider in their darkest hour shows some insecurity deep down even as he has nothing to fear.
Since I have nothing to lose, he can be sure I will fight back every new attack, even as I have nothing personal against him. Other people insulted/threatened me way worse and didn't apologize but this involves a highly respected and old provider and I have the right to demand some kind of proof or at least looking into it seriously.
I provided proof for my "allegations" I still have to receive any from Francisco or (allegedly) his minion. If they "fight" like this, fine, bring it on. Francisco knows me and everyone else knows I wont stop (if not banned again) until proof is provided or slander stops.
Remember all the attacks, the memes, the insults, slander (called me pedophile for calling his Tor attacks as BS) which aldryic threw at me? Did those make me back off? Or your threats to "indirectly" fire me? No, I have proved beyond any reason of a doubt your BW was shit, even after you banned me, still had to fight it off until you decided to blame the DC (which was a meme you used against "lesser" providers).
Someone knows all that, and they are STILL attacking me? Expecting to get away with it again without any proof? Seriously?
Even raindog will one day look into it or ban me, which is the same.
No, you clearly didn't. You're coming off as a super whiny baby over a nothingburger in 2013 (!!!).
Seriously, don't bring it up again and move on.
Amazing... I have answered this previously, let me a remind that for you:
.
Remember this message as well? You silently ignored it.
Why? No proofs?
Please, kindly take care of your words and stop being paranoid.
Highly respected provider keeping this paranoid, I would instantly leave from prometeus.
Each time they attack me I will show why and since they have no proof, I will present mine when asked.
It was the admin demanding proof from the slandered person which is the norm here, I usually present the proof (shitty bw, threats, clear slander, insults, attacks clearly against the rules) and the attackers have to present nothing, yet I am banned in the end with some made up rule which doesn't even apply.
I am waiting for the regular course of the action here.
Then don't be surprised when you've annoyed everyone here and don't give a shit anymore. You're fast approaching this.
I did re install and stayed like this
The process of VM rebuilding is in progress. Please try again later.
That is the idea, then they will also stop attacking me. Since asking to enforce the rules always fails, banning me, stopping the attacks as they dont give a shit anymore is also good.
As long as I am being attacked as well as my employer, we still matter too much, so I have to continue.
What if I would call Francisco names here? If I would say he is a shit provider for deleting my VM and taking my money for no reason? In the first case I would be banned for breaking the rules, in the second I would be asked for proof. Since others do that against me, I am asked for proof and I will end up banned, probably, because I come up with the absurd demand to apply the rules and not lay down low (let it go) when mocked for it.
Which and where? I.e. Dedi/vm-nvme/storage Oradea, something like that.
Why would you be banned for that? It'd go like this (since we've had this literally happen on here already):
Users that can't chargeback also don't go through fraud checks with us, which makes it so people don't pay us and then get nothing. Imagine paying BTC's wild fees and get nothing. That's not fair.
Where a user can lose their VM with us is if they start abusing. We're far stricter on alipay/crypto users when it comes to abuse.
Can we please stay on thread topic?
Francisco
Except this is not what is happening here. I am personally attacked and also Prometeus called a shit provider for some unclear thing (I either shutdown his vm and pocketed the money letting the credit expire or suspended him for no reason) in all threads he can find me posting in. I ask for a ticket number I am not provided with one. There is nothing to solve as I have no idea what his problem is.
When I flag the posts insulting me and Prometeus the admins mock it in a thread which has nothing to do with it forcing me to react and defend. The attacker, admins and "me toos" join the attacks just for the lulz. It worked in the past, will work again.
I will continue to flag the slander until banned or until the rules are enforced. No chance for the latter, so I am waiting the ban for "abusing admin time" or some other shit like that. I know all that too well.
Since you are asking this to the thread derailers (my attacker and admin which supports him) I am all for it. If you are asking me to stop defending myself and no longer request the enforcement of the rules, then I must disagree. I have the right to defend myself and point to the rules, no matter what you or others think. I know this means banning, it happened 3 times so far, nobody will miss me and the feeling is mutual.
I'm asking everyone to shut up and stay on topic, end of.
The topic at hand is HS, that's it.
Good topics:
Bad topics:
Please, just keep it on point. People looking for this information get tired of reading through useless crap.
Francisco
NVME Oradea
So, in spite of the prediction of top providers here, not only that norway didn't go down, but even previously involucrated locations are starting to come online. AlexVolk, time to attack me some more.
That is the whole point. Please! PLEASE! Please defend yourself. Instead of whining, and crying, and moaning, and whimpering, please find your proof. Spend this time to find your proof, create multiple links (or screenshots) of all these important accusations which declare you as victim, and let's create a very beautiful drama founded on those screenshots or links. But please, for the love of humanity, gather all that proof which generates so much turmoil that it started derailing other dramas.
If you have no multiple screenshots, or links, or anything tangible, stop crying like a baby and shut up!
Important note: it is your problem to find your proof. It is not staff problem, because you are not some star or VIP of this forum (even though I saw you as one when you were unbanned). I hate Francisco too, but I do not go so low into asking others to search for some proof against him. Be a man and step up with something, anything; or be coward and cry like a baby because some other kid took your pacifier.
If you continue making ANY accusations without proof, you will lose my respect (not that it matters to you), and I will kindly request LET staff to ban you.
Nope, it is not. It is the attacker which has to provide the proof. Until then I can flag his posts as slander and point to the rules. I know the admins don't like that as it shows the double standards operating here but have no choice.
I am not sure what accusations I have made. AlexVolk and the admin find it funny to derail threads with accusations and support for them against me (don't care) and Prometeus (I care) then you ask me for proof? I am not sure whether you are trolling or joined the "me too" choir asking for a ban so I can no longer defend myself.
OK. I hereby kindly request staff to ban @Maounique cry baby. Staff is not guilty for @Maounique picking on others in order to create dramas while wasting staff's time.
The end is nigh on this one.
Until then I can only click on thanks button for each message you post as paranoid and point to the proofs to what you have said.
Lol at @Francisco trying to play moderator.. @Maounique don't worry, those of us with an IQ above 130 can see through Francisco's smoke and mirrors and know his word means absolutely fuck all
You should marry with @Maounique and come to Vegas.
Never saw so much affection.
@alexvolk @Maounique will you be my husbands?
I wonder if this would be tolerated against any provider without proof let alone one operating since 1997 and voted top provider here many times. Just a sample, he shitted on too many threads offtopic, I only picked his turds from a couple.
"asshole" "idiot" "utter trash" just a few samples. Would that be tolerated against other people and providers? Is this in line with the rules? Is it normal for someone to follow you on all threads and post this shit offtopic and, more importantly, would it be tolerated against other people and providers?
Maybe yes and LET changed rules and forgot to update them.
This happened many times before, people post shit about me and Prometeus without being asked for proof then I am asked for proof (what for?) and banned for some ridiculous reason.
Now I said nothing past some point when his game became obvious, just flagged his posts which were breaking the rules, then the admin feels like I have not been provoked enough and adds his weight completely offtopic and then I am attacked for posting offtopic to defend myself.
I am curious if it will work again
https://im.ge/i/dr9gp
I hope I am using the right site now :P
(a) I clearly mentioned that
(b) with a provider like HS systems working at all, albeit not reachable seemed noteworthy.
(c) terrahost based system works fine.
But yes, all in all a seriously sad state.
Nope. "I'll provision myself a new VM" clearly suggests hacking or (ab)using a vulnerability. @Maounique is perfectly right in taking that as a threat, especially after you threatening to get his employment or contract cancelled.
I'm neither pro nor anti either of you and I can understand that one acts imprudently when angry, but hey, stand by what you said/did.
And I think that as an admin you should carefully avoid to look biased. Repeatedly taking the side of one user against another risks to make you look biased.
Well noted, I value and like you but I found it disgusting that you even went so far to publish what was private communication (his flagging (real or imaginary) slander). I've also come to consider @Francisco a fine provider and a guy with a spine but still, what he said looked like a threat to me; maybe he was understandably angry (I don't know the context) but I'd expect to clear things the next day and to apologize.
@Maounique
You seem to have some quite sensitive spots and while I can understand that you do fight against what you perceive as threat/injustice/[insert evil], the way you do that seems to not work but is making you look like on PMS. If you feel that on LET you're bound to be a victim, don't fight here and in the way you do but choose another context and/or way, e.g. a court - and/or think more about whether something "triggering" you is really worth a fight. One factor seems to be a constant anyway: you can win against people, but you can't win against the LET community or admins.
Example:
Can you prove that he "decrypted" Solus? If not consider that there might be a gap in between your perception or interpretation and actual facts, laws, etc. Also keep in mind that alleging that someone is in breach of EULA or law - as you clearly did - is not to be taken lightly and highly likely slander unless proven.
All 3 or 4 of us?
(Suggestion: replace '130' by the upper bound of 'average IQ', 115)
@Francisco
I fully support your suggestion to return to this threads topic.
@cociu
Tomorrow is monday (TM)!
Yes, because you can't reuse any code without reading it. He admitted it publicly, even made it a badge of honour when he was attacking Solus' (admittedly many and huge) bugs to brag about his skills.
I will dig all the proof if he sues me. But he won't even threaten me with that, no matter how angry he gets that I am still allowed to defend myself.
I would love the opportunity to defend myself in a court of law, I don't even need a lawyer.
That is not the point. The point is that he noticed I am no longer replying the provocations and felt that he needs to provoke me further from the admin position by posting publicly, completely offtopic, without even a private message (if he had a problem with me flagging the post breaking rules), to force me to defend myself and get a reason for the ban. This is a well trodden path, if the attacked person does not feed the troll, we intervene as admins to take the provocations to the next level, one that cannot be ignored anymore. That is what is disgusting.