Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

UCEPROTECT Strikes Again

2»

Comments

  • wpyogawpyoga Member

    @stevewatson301 said:
    They also like to believe that women cannot work in tech, so the comment about you is hardly the most unprofessional one.

    http://www.uceprotect.org/cart00neys/2021-001.html

    I actually checked that link, but I cannot find anything that points to them believing that "women cannot work in tech". I've read the whole thing, and then started over and searched for the keyword "wom" but could only find the two mentions to "woman" at the top of the page. They don't seem to suggest any belief that "women cannot work in tech".

    Can you point it out for me? Maybe I missed it.

    Here's what I found on that page:
    "It's been almost 10 years since someone was stupid enough to spam on our sponsors and cry over us and our methods.
    This time, however, we have a premiere: A Woman
    Actually, it reads more like a brat than a woman..."

    For me it reads like "we found someone who was stupid enough to spam our sponsors... and it's a woman, but it's more like a brat actually".

Sign In or Register to comment.