New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Well we had 1 fraud so 1 back in stock.
oos again ?
that was terrible, as second miss again.
If you plan to re-stock it, think about offering more configs. I'm looking for something like 1core/1GBram/1TBdisc...
Not sure if its a temporary issue but network performance doesn't look that great.
Yeah people are mass downloading files to their VPS and running YABS like crazy. All nodes have 1 gbps public so yeah it's pretty much saturated at this point.
This is normal after a sale though, it will usually stabilize soon.
Makes sense, will try again later.
I'm late.
I realized that since you @marvel started with Brick the network speed has dropped quite a bit.
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 508 Mbits/sec | 132 Mbits/sec Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 532 Mbits/sec | 98.0 Mbits/sec WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 649 Mbits/sec | 130 Mbits/sec Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 185 Mbits/sec | 5.90 Mbits/sec Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 466 Mbits/sec | 37.5 Mbits/sec Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 529 Mbits/sec | 36.6 Mbits/sec Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 343 Mbits/sec | 18.9 Mbits/sec Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | busy | busy
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 298 Mbits/sec | 216 Mbits/sec Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 195 Mbits/sec WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 406 Mbits/sec | 272 Mbits/sec Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 341 Mbits/sec | 128 Mbits/sec Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 265 Mbits/sec | 120 Mbits/sec
The bricks are hardly using any bandwidth. Maybe 10 mbps on average. But there is some congestion on the network since this morning. It looks like our bandwidth is not fully usable, I'm currently investigating this with the guys at the DC.
@marvel I'm a BRICK user though, just noticed that the outbound speed (from your DC, download from BRICK) is fast and normal, but inbound speed (to your DC, upload to BRICK) is really slow (globally), maybe 5 Mbps on average.
Hi Chocoweb this is not really the topic for this, it's better to open a ticket or even DM me here.
Anyway I doubt this is us, there are so many users with slower upload than download speeds / wifi connections. It could be anything. We did have some congestion yesterday though, so I would advice to try again today.
More storage soon!
Obv. this was an insane deal and I hope the folks who got one are happy with it. I didn't hear anything back so I guess so
I like to have more people on-board next time though. So question is what would you like to see next? Would you e.g. consider a NAT storage VPS? Or maybe something like object storage/S3?
Nat storage vps with a lot of bandwidth aka perfect seedvox
Yeah I don't know about seedboxes. I do allow limited torrenting for personal use but I don't want to be a seedbox host. I prefer white hat stuff. For seedboxes I'm sure there are much better options.
no nat please
same offer again. it's perfectly fine.
Managed cloud storage (similiar to Heztner), separate instance that allows nextcloud, minio, rsync using the space allocated. Has to be priced competitively against heztner. You may need to look into and tune your network. Test your network from US, EU VPSs, and see if you can improve it. Thanks.
Yes NAT VPS with 1 Gbps unmetered
We have it already
https://billing.novos.be/store/novos-brick
But yeah it's not separate instances, if that's what you mean. It's cheaper than Hetzner though. If you want to try it you can sign up for free 10 GB.
You are missing other features compared to hetzner.
Their offering can be usued with other protocols, e.g. s3, rsync, etc...
I'm aware but like I said these options only work with separate instances.
NAT storage VPS sound great
NAT storage VPS
NAT storage VPS would be a great deal
NAT is cool and all
But how much would the price necessary reduce if you remove ipv4 from the equation? I would assume the storage cost would be the majority of it at volumes beyond 1TB.
Yeah good point. It might not be worth the hassle.
Make
NAT with multiple Storage options sounds nice