Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Run a vm with alot of other things on a server

Currently i am running alot of stuff under Debian 10 on my home server, but i suddenly need a windows vm. What is the best / easy way to run this ? I tried running the normal proxmox installer on top of the existing system, but returned a load of errors. The server is currently running rclone, virtualmin (webmin), plex, a few file shares and stuff. I want to keep this bare-metal, and just put a windows vm on top of the existing system without to much trouble.

Advice on best practise here? Or am i doomed, and should install proxmox or vmware bare-metal instead?

Comments

  • Mr_TomMr_Tom Member, Host Rep

    Are you running a GUI on this? If so, just install VirtualBox or virtual machine machine manager to make it easier.

    Or just install qemu/virsh/etc and launch the VM that way - https://www.linuxtechi.com/install-configure-kvm-debian-10-buster/ seems to cover most of it (both GUI and command line methods)

  • Not running any GUI, but i will look at that link.

    Looks like i firgured out why proxmox refused to install, so i might try that first, as i do have some experience in proxmox

    Thanked by 1Mr_Tom
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Mr_Tom said:
    Are you running a GUI on this? If so, just install VirtualBox or virtual machine machine manager to make it easier.

    VirtualBox doesn't need a GUI - you can control VMs with VBoxManage command, Vagrant script, or a VirtualBox GUI component installed on a remote machine.

    However, I'm increasingly unhappy about VirtualBox because it's slow and bugs are not being fixed.
    I hear libvirt is better.

  • Mr_TomMr_Tom Member, Host Rep
    edited January 2021

    @yoursunny said: VirtualBox doesn't need a GUI - you can control VMs with VBoxManage command, Vagrant script, or a VirtualBox GUI component installed on a remote machine.

    However, I'm increasingly unhappy about VirtualBox because it's slow and bugs are not being fixed.

    I hear libvirt is better.

    I haven't used VirtualBox for a while to be fair - although qemu/libvirt/etc would be my first choice.

Sign In or Register to comment.