Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

★ VirMach ★ Black Friday & Cyber Week 2018 ★ RAID 10 SSD ★ OpenVZ & KVM ★ Check inside for offers!

1410411413415416548

Comments

  • Oh, shit... joke's on me right!?! :lol: :joy: I guess once the thread "drops" (terminology?), it's not just the last update time that does not get updated, but view counts as well.... Dang! All that table formatting down the drain, stupid! :grimace:

    Hmmm... should we serve bus photos from our servers, and convert them to beacons just to track real view counts?!? :sweat_smile:

  • I think the view counts should get updated even if the thread drops off. Maybe @FAT32 can give us some more insight.

    Thanked by 1TheWizard
  • @saibal said:
    I think the view counts should get updated even if the thread drops off. Maybe @FAT32 can give us some more insight.

    Oh, yes, it did increase (by 4 as I'm typing this)! Huh, strange... It kept staying put on the number I posted above even if I Ctrl-F5'ed the thread, or viewed it from a private/incognito session, so I thought it was frozen as well...

    Either the forum has a more complex view-count tracker than I expected, or maybe not a very robust one, don't know... yes, we shall wait the expert! :)

  • I think the view counts are stored in a write back cache and the view counts shown are probably fetched from another read cache or the database depending on LET's setup. The write back cache updates the database periodically with the new view counts. So if there are no thread views for sometime, the displayed view count should catch up with the actual view count (eventually consistent).

  • @FrankZ said: EDIT: Woke up today wondering if @VirMach will let me migrate/transfer my 384MB Frankfort VM on GERKVM1C to Dallas instead of Amsterdam ?

    Buffalo would fly for sure, no idea about Dallas. I am pretty sure EU is more expensive than USA, so it's worth to ask :)

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • imokimok Member
    edited December 2020

    @saibal said:
    Turkey I believe.

    Karagül?

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • As long as the beers are cold and the women beautiful...

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • Yes. I used to watch that at lunch every day :D

    Thanked by 1saibal
  • @TheWizard said:

    @ben47955 said: This thread is probably monitored by more people than you may think.

    Let's test that.... With a view count trend table/graph! Unless there are time limits in Vanilla for when/how many times(?) a post can be edited, I'll try to track the view count changes here with a table...

    It seems there are limits on that, huh? I cannot edit the post... :(

    Here's the populated table for the first ~23 hours then!...

    UTC View Count Elapsed Time Delta(n-1) Delta(0) Views/6-hours(?)
    12/15 22:13 148,425 0 0 0 -
    12/16 09:36 148,450 11:23 25 25 13.2
    12/16 15:10 148,471 16:57 21 46 16.3
    12/16 21:23 148,486 23:10 15 61 15.8
  • @saibal said: Black Rose.

    Holy smoke! I did hear that some Turkish series were popular in several Middle Eastern countries, but man, that's a whole lot more countries than I expected!

    @imok said: Yes. I used to watch that at lunch every day :D

    But then again it was apparently popular enough to entertain you during lunch, huh! :) Were/are you in one of those countries listed in WP, or were you watching over internet?

  • Yes, series like that side are very popular in Peru.

    Fatmagul.

  • Are the Ryzens changing to Threadrippers?

  • Are Ya Winning, guys?

  • Two days away and I stopped dreaming about servers, so I guess it's ok to come back now :)

    Thanked by 2saibal randomq
  • It's time to dream of dedis now :D

    Thanked by 2FrankZ randomq
  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited December 2020

    -- redacted --
    Maybe I am not quite ready to come back yet :disappointed:

  • Is this bad? Single core VM seems real sluggish:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu 17 Dec 2020 11:27:56 PM EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2599.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 2.6 GiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 14.5 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 16.50 MB/s    (4.1k) | 21.27 MB/s     (332)
    Write      | 16.52 MB/s    (4.1k) | 21.65 MB/s     (338)
    Total      | 33.02 MB/s    (8.2k) | 42.93 MB/s     (670)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 24.10 MB/s      (47) | 20.28 MB/s      (19)
    Write      | 25.86 MB/s      (50) | 22.17 MB/s      (21)
    Total      | 49.96 MB/s      (97) | 42.46 MB/s      (40)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 387 Mbits/sec   | 203 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 317 Mbits/sec   | 64.3 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 151 Mbits/sec   | 46.0 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 340 Mbits/sec   | 204 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 658 Mbits/sec   | 109 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 463 Mbits/sec   | 634 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 322 Mbits/sec   | 56.1 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 248
    Multi Core      | 254
    
  • Who is a bot here ?

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @ben47955 said:
    Who is a bot here ?

    Yes

  • @ben47955 said:
    Who is a bot here ?

    Not a bot, beep.

  • @ben47955 said:
    Who is a bot here ?

    Question too complex, please ask yes/no questions!

  • Sherezade!

  • @TheWizard said:

    @ben47955 said:
    Who is a bot here ?

    Question too complex, please ask yes/no questions!

    Abort, Retry, Fail?

  • Destroy

  • Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • @randomq said: Abort, Retry, Fail?

    Idle!

  • @imok said:
    Sherezade!

    Yeah, Fatmagul and that one were big back in the day... I only heard about them though, I was in the US then...

  • Here's the populated table for... 3days+

    UTC Views Comments Elapsed Time Delta (n-1) Delta (0) Vs / 6hrs
    12/15 22:13 148,425
    12/16 09:36 148,450 11:23 25 25 13.2
    12/16 15:10 148,471 16:57 21 46 16.3
    12/16 21:23 148,486 23:10 15 61 15.8
    12/17 12:26 148,513 38:13 27 88 13.8
    12/17 18:29 148,526 44:16 13 101 13.7
    12/17 22:50 148,530 12,374 48:37 4 105 13.0
    12/18 08:40 148,554 12,378 58:27 24 129 13.2
    12/18 11:05 148,555 12,378 60:52 1 130 12.8
    12/18 13:26 148,561 12,382 63:13 6 136 12.9
    12/18 23:16 148,589 12,388 73:03 28 164 13.5
  • @randomq said: Is this bad? Single core VM seems real sluggish:

    Relatively the same as the only VirMach machine I purchased this year.
    Hopefully it will improve with time, as others on the node abandon idle their boxes.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Dec 18 20:38:10 CST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2099.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.3 GiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.3 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 26.21 MB/s    (6.5k) | 38.74 MB/s     (605)
    Write      | 26.25 MB/s    (6.5k) | 39.05 MB/s     (610)
    Total      | 52.46 MB/s   (13.1k) | 77.80 MB/s    (1.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 23.48 MB/s      (45) | 17.60 MB/s      (17)
    Write      | 24.77 MB/s      (48) | 19.37 MB/s      (18)
    Total      | 48.25 MB/s      (93) | 36.98 MB/s      (35)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 767 Mbits/sec   | 166 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 893 Mbits/sec   | 161 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 817 Mbits/sec   | 13.0 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 310 Mbits/sec   | 31.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 899 Mbits/sec   | 756 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 555 Mbits/sec   | 174 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 894 Mbits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 397 Mbits/sec   | 224 Mbits/sec
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 271 Mbits/sec   | 65.9 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 267 Mbits/sec   | 54.2 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 276 Mbits/sec   | 59.8 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 335 Mbits/sec   | 335 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 232 Mbits/sec   | 70.3 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 273
    Multi Core      | 408
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/5408433
    

    Note: IPv6 is via HE tunnel

    Thanked by 1RecD
This discussion has been closed.