Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CRAZY DEALS + CRAZY GIVEAWAY. THE HOTTEST BLACK FRIDAY THREAD. 40+ Prizes by RackNerd

1169170172174175274

Comments

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    PING lowendtalk.com (104.26.9.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=2.38 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.50 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.59 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.33 ms

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    PING lowendtalk.com (172.67.68.9): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=5.753 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.245 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.974 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.330 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.433 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.750 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=5.509 ms
    64 bytes from 172.67.68.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=8.016 ms

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    time=60.7 ms
    Not bad... but ain't touchin 12ms

  • dustincdustinc Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @inti82 said:
    Whats the secret sauce behind RackNerd's business model ? Is this sustainable ?!

    All this has ever been is hard work, experience and hunger to achieve more, be more, and expand. Most importantly help people grow and giving back. So we are doing exactly that. I am the founder of RackNerd with commitment to success, commitment to excellent customer service and commitment to expansion to help service our customers. I can go on, about my experience and commitment but this is about us. Our team here at RackNerd. If there’s any sauce, it’s that. Our targets and mission are matching. Regarding sustainability, everything we do is for profit. We also aren’t specifically a lowend host. We have real office space and target local business, with the MSP approach. This bring us healthy margins as well. What we’ve done as a company already, is history! Appreciate all you being part of it. This party isn’t over!

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    I'm averaging 14ms. Min 12.

  • @inti82 said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    PING lowendtalk.com (104.26.9.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=2.38 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.50 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.59 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.33 ms

    No way! Where are you in right now? Are you in the datacenter god damn

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    I get 3-4ms, but that's really not how this works. I'm in Asia so in reality my ping is way higher.

    Every time someone makes a new comment, cloudflare's pop from somewhere in Asia would have to go through LET and back to me which is easily 200+ ms. The forum is dynamic and not static, after all.

    Thanked by 1Whoa
  • @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    Isn't that just your ping to the closest Cloudflare POP ?

  • @Whoa said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @smallbibi said:

    @DanSummer said: how come? I'm under 12ms to LET. I consider that fast.

    Well, maybe you need fast fingers too :p

    Everyone open terminal and ping LowEndTalk.com. What do you get? I get 12ms

    Isn't that just your ping to the closest Cloudflare POP ?

    Guys. After further investigation (and being proven wrong by every LET member), I have concluded that my ping statement is completely and utterly false. Sorry :)

  • @Sebster27 said:
    Guys. After further investigation (and being proven wrong by every LET member), I have concluded that my ping statement is completely and utterly false. Sorry :)

    Why is it false? Your ping to LET is relative to the nearest CloudFlare node.

  • 5 packets ranged from 16.9 to 17.3 ms. Compared with what you guys are getting, I was correct to claim I was at a distinct disadvantage.

    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=17.2 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=17.1 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=16.9 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=17.0 ms
    ^X64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=17.3 ms

  • And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

  • Do I get free bandwidth :smile: ?
    order number 9409278650
    @dustinc

  • Pinging lowendtalk.com [104.26.8.4] with 32 bytes of da
    Reply from 104.26.8.4: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=56
    Reply from 104.26.8.4: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=56
    Reply from 104.26.8.4: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=56
    Reply from 104.26.8.4: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=56
    
  • @hex368 said:
    Do I get free bandwidth :smile: ?
    order number 9409278650
    @dustinc

    He's got a lot of them to catch up on (mine included). So, might take a bit.

    Thanked by 2dustinc hex368
  • @dominame said:
    5 packets ranged from 16.9 to 17.3 ms. Compared with what you guys are getting, I was correct to claim I was at a distinct disadvantage.

    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=17.2 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=17.1 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=16.9 ms
    64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=17.0 ms
    ^X64 bytes from 2606:4700:20::681a:804 (2606:4700:20::681a:804): icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=17.3 ms

    pfft.

    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=358 ttl=58 time=49.5 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=359 ttl=58 time=36.2 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=360 ttl=58 time=37.2 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=361 ttl=58 time=45.8 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=362 ttl=58 time=39.3 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=363 ttl=58 time=56.1 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=364 ttl=58 time=34.4 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=365 ttl=58 time=41.8 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=366 ttl=58 time=39.1 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=367 ttl=58 time=35.5 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4 (104.26.9.4): icmp_seq=368 ttl=58 time=53.0 ms

  • PING lowendtalk.com (104.26.9.4): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=181.499 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=180.349 ms
    cloudflare left the game in germany

  • frodriguez96frodriguez96 Member
    edited November 2020
    Pinging lowendtalk.com [2606:4700:20::ac43:4409] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4409: time=9ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4409: time=8ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4409: time=8ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::ac43:4409: time=8ms
    
  • @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    Ill take a ryzen dedi, thank you :smiley:

  • @vue said:
    PING lowendtalk.com (104.26.9.4): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=181.499 ms
    64 bytes from 104.26.9.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=180.349 ms
    cloudflare left the game in germany

    Ouch, that's quite baad.

  • @frodriguez96 said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    Ill take a ryzen dedi, thank you :smiley:

    Send credit card details to my PM. Then you got it! :)

    Thanked by 1bitseeker
  • @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    I thought this was supposed to be fun. Hearing you brag while others are trying really hard at a severe disadvantage is not fun.

  • @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    Ill take a ryzen dedi, thank you :smiley:

    Send credit card details to my PM. Then you got it! :)

    Will a target gift card work?

  • @fitkoh said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    I thought this was supposed to be fun. Hearing you brag while others are trying really hard at a severe disadvantage is not fun.

    I'm sorry. It was just one :) And I also did give quite a few away, so I think I earned one brag point

  • @frodriguez96 said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    Ill take a ryzen dedi, thank you :smiley:

    Send credit card details to my PM. Then you got it! :)

    Will a target gift card work?

    Amazon is better, but I guess we could work out target haha!

  • Pinging lowendtalk.com [2606:4700:20::681a:804] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::681a:804: time=17ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::681a:804: time=19ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::681a:804: time=18ms
    Reply from 2606:4700:20::681a:804: time=14ms

  • @dustinc said:

    @inti82 said:
    Whats the secret sauce behind RackNerd's business model ? Is this sustainable ?!

    All this has ever been is hard work, experience and hunger to achieve more, be more, and expand. Most importantly help people grow and giving back. So we are doing exactly that. I am the founder of RackNerd with commitment to success, commitment to excellent customer service and commitment to expansion to help service our customers. I can go on, about my experience and commitment but this is about us. Our team here at RackNerd. If there’s any sauce, it’s that. Our targets and mission are matching. Regarding sustainability, everything we do is for profit. We also aren’t specifically a lowend host. We have real office space and target local business, with the MSP approach. This bring us healthy margins as well. What we’ve done as a company already, is history! Appreciate all you being part of it. This party isn’t over!

    Here we are.. cheering for you @dustinc and co. to grow and compete with likes of digitalocean, linode and vultr!

    Thanked by 1dustinc
  • @Sebster27 said:

    @fitkoh said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    I thought this was supposed to be fun. Hearing you brag while others are trying really hard at a severe disadvantage is not fun.

    I'm sorry. It was just one :) And I also did give quite a few away, so I think I earned one brag point

    So you're bragging because you're playing on a higher field than most... very classy.

  • @fitkoh said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @fitkoh said:

    @Sebster27 said:

    @frodriguez96 said:
    And for that, @Sebster27 is buying everyone a shot of racknerd servers

    After all my giveaway wins, I might be able to afford that :)

    That was my only brag out of the entire BF forum. That was it, I promise

    I thought this was supposed to be fun. Hearing you brag while others are trying really hard at a severe disadvantage is not fun.

    I'm sorry. It was just one :) And I also did give quite a few away, so I think I earned one brag point

    So you're bragging because you're playing on a higher field than most... very classy.

    dude chill. you seem to be really upset about a giveaway and now you are being the moral police. that behaviour is also very unclassy

Sign In or Register to comment.