New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Don't buy skb-enterprise.com
I use their servers last year
Network is garbage and services all wrose
They never refund any money and always say users have trouble
wow! It looks like I'm not the only one deceived
You started a dubious thread last April:
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/156860/dont-buy-skb-enterprise-bad-experience
Right
Based on your screenshots, I wouldn't call @skbenterprise a scammer, but I would agree that more clarification from them would be (would have been) useful
Wtf are you even talking about? And you want to talk about reading comprehension. Aren't you the one who corrects spelling errors and shit around here and should know the difference between being told you're a dick and having a dick?
You're entering into an agreement under false pretenses. Right off the bat you're dishonest. Keep trying to justify what you called out someone else for doing what is no different from you. Your example kind of shows what kind of customer you are and how you treat your financial responsibilities.
Constantly worrying about your basic information "being sold" is a sign of paranoia and/or narcissism. You're really not that important.
That doesn't matter.
Wtf? Why would that matter when phoning someone only? They should use Chinese name on paper and English name verbally only? Not just confusing, that's fucking stupid. People live in the real world and interact with people in person every day. Many people go by names other than their birth certificates and perfectly normal so long as they consistently use it. It's actually suspect when names keep changing.
Bottom line, you needed to convince them you didn't abuse their server, which hasn't been proven. It is correct you've been found guilty before providing any opportunity to provide a defense.
The screenshot doesn't show timestamps. You need to show you didn't use the server and therefore no abuse occurred to be found at fault.
They are not scamming you, it's been pointed out several times, so you're losing sympathy. Also, when you say shit like "we'll make you famous" by threatening bad reviews, that's Kanye level asshole behavior. Lastly, it's 2.49.
tl;dr it all comes down to showing you did not in fact abuse the server because you never had it provisioned and therefore could never have done what they claim. If you can, you're proven correct and the provider looks really bad for false accusations. Stop ranting about the refund, that's not the issue to be settled first. It's whether abuse occurred.
I was wondering the same.
The timestamps on his emails would resolve the issue!
so, this is the timeline
Another host can just Flag his account pending verification.
Accepting payment, and not giving the service is fraud anywhere in the world. Just because the client is -allegedly- a fraduster, doesn't justify the host scamming him.
If there is any cost charged by the payment processor, it's the Host responsibity. Why would the client must give a shit about the PP deal with the host. Paypal literally forbid their users to charge additional sums of money just because their client choose paypal.
This is one thing that @cociu done right. If he sees a troublesome client, he just refund him. no question, no shit asked.
This is of course assuming OP doesn't break any TOS on his server usage (assuming he had the chance to use the server).
If a convict comes to you for a job, you have the right to give or refuse him the job. But it's a fraud to give him the job, but refuse to pay him just because he is a convict.
Thanks. 20 minutes is definitely too tight to generate and receive abuse reports. You're in the right.
The provider said in another thread you were refunded weeks ago now. Can you confirm you received the full amount?
According to his description,
If he on the fraud list
If he places an order through his real information and the order is judged to be fraudulent after payment, he should receive a full refund.(because the merchant already knows that he exists in the fraud list in advance, but still allows him to pay, but refuses to provide services for him on the basis of fraud, and collects the refund "handling fee"
I originally posted my comment relatively early in the thread when various details were still not clear.
Although I'm not sure that all of the details are clear now, I'd probably be more inclined to side with the OP now than with the provider.