New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Feedback & Suggestions
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
We're fixing this now.
Ok the cookie issue should be fixed now.
Sounds good Liam.
Mhm working fine here aswell.
Ohhh yesh
Happy to be of service
suggestion:
1. Option to remove "thanks' which is given by mistake?
>
Thanked a few people you wanted to flag?
We need the community roundup posts on lowendbox again. It was great for a few months whilst Liam was doing it.
None of the BSA adds are working.. might want to open a BSA ticket.
Are you sure? I see them.
Try clicking one.
Also no issues. Each ad redirect me to proper host page (at LEB and LET) - just tryed. Or there's something other I'm missing?
They seem to be working for me.
They seem to have already fixed them.
stats.buysellads.com wasnt resolving.
What's up with all the "what's the cheapest VPS in ___" threads? I think it's a bit too much and a different section for these requests would be better perhaps?
Like the "Requests" section? ;-)
I would love HTTPS on LowEndTalk.
Why you want this?
Security reasons. It makes me feel a bit queasy if I'm on a open network on my phone or friend's computer (without a SSH Tunnel or VPN), and someone can just intercept or MITM my passwords that are sent in plain text.
Even then, I deft. imagine some LET members use the same passwords as their VM, and don't have a VPN.
Besides, if you hadn't noticed, NSA security scandal.
NSA has free access to unlock every SSL certificate.
Cheers to America.
Thanks to Verisign buying most CAs.
So... self signed SSL is more secure then than a purchased SSL?
Possibly, but then they have the computing power to crack all the certs either way. It depends on if you count NSA seeing your stuff as secure or insecure.
Put it in perspective though: DDoS protection providers also do similar things. I have read quite a few papers / explanations on HTTPS protection where they explain how they will decrypt the SSL to determine which packets are real packets in order to DDoS filter and serve them to the user. They claim this as breakthrough tech.
That's why you use SSL+PFS.
Right, and how would they unlock the certificates? Certificate authorities can't do that, at most they can revoke it.
._.
Can it be that this depends on the Browser you use? Because with FF 23 I never have this problem.
@ska impossible, afaik its a markdown issue. Try drafting a thread and see what happens.