Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

★ VirMach ★ Black Friday & Cyber Week 2018 ★ RAID 10 SSD ★ OpenVZ & KVM ★ Check inside for offers!

1172173175177178548

Comments

  • @VirMach Why OpenVZ plan do not have "Backordered " for EU location? KVM offers have it

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire
    edited December 2018

    @VirMach The performance of Storage Server is barely usable, any idea why? It is limited in stock so I doubt it is due to overloading.

    Host node: NYHDD10GKVM2

    VirMach:

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        10.941 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        12.722 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        10.351 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 88.4 us / 5.90 ms / 290.2 ms / 24.0 ms
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 16 requests in 5.46 s, 4 MiB, 2 iops, 750.2 KiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    4.96 MiB/s
        2nd run:    4.77 MiB/s
        3rd run:    5.72 MiB/s
        average:    5.15 MiB/s
    

    Another provider:

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        2.858 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        3.343 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 85.7 us / 283.2 us / 2.64 ms / 91.6 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 9.31 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.27 GiB, 1.86 k iops, 465.7 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    188.83 MiB/s
        2nd run:    342.37 MiB/s
        3rd run:    352.86 MiB/s
        average:    294.69 MiB/s
    
  • @FAT32 said:
    @VirMach The performance of Storage Server is barely usable, any idea why? It is limited in stock so I doubt it is due to overloading.

    Host node: NYHDD10GKVM2

    VirMach:

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        10.941 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        12.722 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        10.351 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 88.4 us / 5.90 ms / 290.2 ms / 24.0 ms
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 16 requests in 5.46 s, 4 MiB, 2 iops, 750.2 KiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    4.96 MiB/s
        2nd run:    4.77 MiB/s
        3rd run:    5.72 MiB/s
        average:    5.15 MiB/s
    

    Another provider:

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        2.858 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        3.343 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 85.7 us / 283.2 us / 2.64 ms / 91.6 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 9.31 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.27 GiB, 1.86 k iops, 465.7 MiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    188.83 MiB/s
        2nd run:    342.37 MiB/s
        3rd run:    352.86 MiB/s
        average:    294.69 MiB/s
    

    Please open a ticket & pm me the ticket ID, I'll have a look. We still have a bunch of people running bench's, though the performance should be better by now. Will definitely check what's going on.

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire
    edited December 2018

    @MikePT Thanks for the help, it is almost 11 days since I got this service but there are still a lot of people running bench? I find it hard to believe this statement. Especially a speed that is as low as 750Kbps (Read) and 5Mbps (Write).

    I am afraid that I will reach the CPU limit soon because of the high IO wait. I will just wait for another day or two before opening a ticket and see how it goes.

  • MikePTMikePT Veteran
    edited December 2018

    @FAT32 said:
    @MikePT Thanks for the help, it is almost 11 days since I got this service but there are still a lot of people running bench? I find it hard to believe this statement. Especially a speed that is as low as 750Kbps (Read) and 5Mbps (Write).

    I am afraid that I will reach the CPU limit soon because of the high IO wait. I will just wait for another day or two before opening a ticket and see how it goes.

    Not only that, we've got some users running torrents and abusing the node. We're on it, but takes time to track those properly. Open a ticket, PM me the ID, I'll investigate this for you. We do our best to ensure an optimal IO for all clients hosted in the same node, though abuse still occurs, and tracking the abusers is sometimes hard stuff. Specially on backup servers.
    E.g: X client runs the initial huge rsync, creates a pretty big IO load, then gets stable, we could flag those as an abuser when it's not, simply syncing backups. I'd be more than happy to check this for you as mentioned @FAT32. We're pretty pro-active.

    Disclaimer: @VirMach's replies are way much better than mine. I'm just a geek. Don't blame me. :P

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire
    edited December 2018

    @MikePT said:

    Not only that, we've got some users running torrents and abusing the node. We're on it, but takes time to track those properly. Open a ticket, PM me the ID, I'll investigate this for you. We do our best to ensure an optimal IO for all clients hosted in the same node, though abuse still occurs, and tracking the abusers is sometimes hard stuff. Specially on backup servers.
    E.g: X client runs the initial huge rsync, creates a pretty big IO load, then gets stable, we could flag those as an abuser when it's not, simply syncing backups. I'd be more than happy to check this for you as mentioned @FAT32. We're pretty pro-active.

    Disclaimer: @VirMach's replies are way much better than mine. I'm just a geek. Don't blame me. :P

    Thanks for the fast response, don't worry I don't want to increase your backlog and will wait for a day or two :)

    But now I have a difficult choice on deciding whether I should cancel my storage VPS with another provider which have fantastic performance (but slightly more expensive). The performance is always great with 100% uptime for 1 full year and even comes with CPU passthrough.

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • Anyone want the code for the free SSD32G?

    LAEDHSALFFFO15TEL

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @randomq said:
    Anyone want the code for the free SSD32G?

    LAEDHSALFFFO15TEL

    Pretty sure that is the coupon for 90% discount for Flash Deal

  • JabJabJabJab Member
    edited December 2018

    randomq said: LAEDHSALFFFO15TEL

    If that was it, that was supposed to be one time only, so no reason to share, lol.
    Also I've seen it few days ago, already used, it's not this ;)

    Reversed: LET51OFFFLASHDEAL
    Totally not a Flash Deal code

  • VirMach said: We are expiring the coupon "BUFPROMOthatsallfolks" -- this was one of the two unredeemed easter eggs. This was not the SSD32G promotion; that one still exists. This promotion was for 99% off the SSD1G package (annually.)

    @TomBG, @alilet you guys have to tell me how the heck you figured out to stick that "BUFFPROMO" in front of the "thatsallfolks"??! Was it just trial and error, or was there a clue somewehere about it (mention of that easter egg being for a "buffalo promotion" or something for example)?

    BTW, from the way VirMach wrote it, should we assume promo codes are case sensitive? That would at least put a bit of a less load on the billing servers with all the easter-egg-crazy poor souls here?! (I did test, and confirm that "save10", and "SAVE10" work the same way, so it looks case insensitive but, if anyone familiar with the whmcs can confirm if it could be set per code for example, that would be appreciated!)

  • JabJabJabJab Member
    edited December 2018

    TheWizard said: @TomBG, @alilet you guys have to tell me how the heck you figured out to stick that "BUFFPROMO" in front of the "thatsallfolks"??!

    Buffalo, the land of unlimited servers.
    The code-prefix was used few times here and there, so it was (kinda, I failed first time :D) obvious to add that prefix too this too. VirMach said they are low on stock, only they have some free space in Buffalo ;).

    The catch was to use annual billing, not monthly. No idea why (I mean I know - it still cost like 0.7$ for a year, for a monthly 0.07$ the payment processors fees would be muuuuuuuuuuuch more than that, in total, for 5 years. I am not even sure if they get anything if we paypal 0.7$ tbh :D)

    Codes are not case sensitive, you can type BUFFPROMO buffPrOmO or w/e you like.

    Thanked by 3eol donli TheWizard
  • @TheWizard said:

    VirMach said: We are expiring the coupon "BUFPROMOthatsallfolks" -- this was one of the two unredeemed easter eggs. This was not the SSD32G promotion; that one still exists. This promotion was for 99% off the SSD1G package (annually.)

    @TomBG, @alilet you guys have to tell me how the heck you figured out to stick that "BUFFPROMO" in front of the "thatsallfolks"??! Was it just trial and error, or was there a clue somewehere about it (mention of that easter egg being for a "buffalo promotion" or something for example)?

    BTW, from the way VirMach wrote it, should we assume promo codes are case sensitive? That would at least put a bit of a less load on the billing servers with all the easter-egg-crazy poor souls here?! (I did test, and confirm that "save10", and "SAVE10" work the same way, so it looks case insensitive but, if anyone familiar with the whmcs can confirm if it could be set per code for example, that would be appreciated!)

    It was trial and error. I didn't even know the first part which is BUFPROMO at all at first but then I read some replies and noted that some codes start with BUFPROMO so I started trying different combinations until I found it.

    Thanked by 2TheWizard FrankZ
  • I'm the first to post in this thread today! :smile:

    Guys, come on, we have to keep this thread alive until BF 2019! :smiley:

    Thanked by 1randomq
  • Good luck with your BF.

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider
    edited December 2019

    @alilet said:

    @TheWizard said:

    VirMach said: We are expiring the coupon "BUFPROMOthatsallfolks" -- this was one of the two unredeemed easter eggs. This was not the SSD32G promotion; that one still exists. This promotion was for 99% off the SSD1G package (annually.)

    @TomBG, @alilet you guys have to tell me how the heck you figured out to stick that "BUFFPROMO" in front of the "thatsallfolks"??! Was it just trial and error, or was there a clue somewehere about it (mention of that easter egg being for a "buffalo promotion" or something for example)?

    BTW, from the way VirMach wrote it, should we assume promo codes are case sensitive? That would at least put a bit of a less load on the billing servers with all the easter-egg-crazy poor souls here?! (I did test, and confirm that "save10", and "SAVE10" work the same way, so it looks case insensitive but, if anyone familiar with the whmcs can confirm if it could be set per code for example, that would be appreciated!)

    It was trial and error. I didn't even know the first part which is BUFPROMO at all at first but then I read some replies and noted that some codes start with BUFPROMO so I started trying different combinations until I found it.

    I mean by the time we had this easter egg there were multiple forced-Buffalo offers where it had that in front, so I figured people could easily figure that out since it was another post about Buffalo-only offers.

    @randomq said:
    Anyone want the code for the free SSD32G?

    LAEDHSALFFFO15TEL

    32G is still out there.

    @angstrom said:
    I'm the first to post in this thread today! :smile:

    Guys, come on, we have to keep this thread alive until BF 2019! :smiley:

    If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen :D

  • VirMach said: If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen

    Challenge accepted ?

  • VirMach said: If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen :D

    Challenge accepted! You better be giving free servers right and left to everyone if it does happen.

    Also, I received a migration ticket from you, it's great that it's being done as it means I get a free upgrade... on top of free server but I find it funny that you said that the server is manually activated and it still ended up on the wrong node.

  • @VirMach said:

    @angstrom said:
    I'm the first to post in this thread today! :smile:

    Guys, come on, we have to keep this thread alive until BF 2019! :smiley:

    If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen :D

    You messed/challenged the wrong people LOL!

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @VirMach said:

    If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen :D

    You will be surprised.

  • Thanked by 2eol uptime
  • @VirMach said:

    @angstrom said:
    I'm the first to post in this thread today! :smile:

    Guys, come on, we have to keep this thread alive until BF 2019! :smiley:

    If this happens we'll have an extra special deal for 2019. I'm only saying this because I know it won't happen :D

    Someone will just have to write a posting bot for one of their idle VirMach VPSs.

  • "extra special deal"

    16 core, 2TB disk, 8M ram, etc... :wink:

  • And it would still sell out

    Thanked by 2VirMach Letzien
  • @randomq said:
    "extra special deal"

    16 core, 2TB disk, 8M ram, etc... :wink:

    10GB transfer a month at 10Gbps.

    Thanked by 1randomq
  • @randomq said:
    "extra special deal"

    16 core, 2TB disk, 8M ram, etc... :wink:

    8M RAM?

  • .640K bandwidth ... should be enough for anyone

    Thanked by 3eol randomq Letzien
  • @eol said:

    @randomq said:
    "extra special deal"

    16 core, 2TB disk, 8M ram, etc... :wink:

    8M RAM?

    Exactly, virmach didn't promise a good deal, just an "extra special" one.

    Thanked by 1eol
  • Okey guys, let this thread die. Save your energy for Christmas Flash Deals, right @VirMach? ;-)

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    Let me check-in to this thread for today.

    Thanked by 1eol
  • BF2019 you say?

This discussion has been closed.