Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner launch dedi-vCPU cloud instances- starting €19.9/ 2vCPUs

2»

Comments

  • Netcup is half the price (even on a monthly contract).
    Also, I suspect a lot of people jumped on the SAS version and hammered the IO.

    I think it would be worthwhile if someone on netcup G8-Rootserver SSD version posts their geekbench scores too.

  • neikneik Member

    @athan, good point there, new product, clean empty nodes.

    @vimalware, my RS is indeed with SAS storage.

    Well, it is not that I am unsatisfied with the performance but I am wondering how this quite big gap can exist using similar HW.

  • @neik said:
    Well, it is not that I am unsatisfied with the performance but I am wondering how this quite big gap can exist using similar HW.

    I don't think that netcup's are true dedicated hardware cpu cores (threads).
    On a RS1000/G8 I own I'm encountering heavy performance deviation during day and almost 50% lower IO than when got it two months ago.

    Only a BuyVM slice I used to own was performing like a true dedi thread (though older arch).
    Sadly I had to drop it because their EU (lux) network routing was very bad.

  • athan said: On a RS1000/G8 I own I'm encountering heavy performance deviation during day and almost 50% lower IO than when got it two months ago.

    That sounds separate from CPU. They don't claim the i/o is dedicated afaik.

    vfuse said: https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/9344676

    32 core: 47821 8 core: 24352 8 core shared: 12648

    Oh that is pretty sad, the shared 8 core back in January got 22457 (https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6624222) so I guess the nodes are saturated now. Also the current 32 vcore instance is less than 2x the speed of the 8 core, oops. Nobody seems to have tested the 16 vcore instance fwiw.

    I saw someplace that Intel might ditch hyperthreading on i7 cpus, possibly as a spectre mitigation, but if that happens in server products, dedicated cores will mean something again. Anyway, it seems to me that bare metal and/or smaller vserver instances are still the best bet for heavy computation.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • neikneik Member
    edited August 2018

    willie said: That sounds separate from CPU. They don't claim the i/o is dedicated afaik.

    That's correct only the CPU is advertised as dedicated the whole environment aroun the CPU is shared.

    athan said: Only a BuyVM slice I used to own was performing like a true dedi thread (though older arch).

    Perf/$ Netcup is far better than BuyVM, thus no alternative to Netcup - at least for me.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • neik said: Perf/$ Netcup is far better than BuyVM, thus no alternative to Netcup - at least for me.

    For heavy cpu I gave up on VPS a long time ago and just use dedis. The Hetzner auction is hard to beat. Netcup RS might come close or edge it out, but not by enough to outweigh what I see as the advantage of single tenant hardware.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • neikneik Member

    @willie said:
    For heavy cpu I gave up on VPS a long time ago and just use dedis. The Hetzner auction is hard to beat. Netcup RS might come close or edge it out, but not by enough to outweigh what I see as the advantage of single tenant hardware.

    That's true and if my budget would be that high there is no doubt I would go with such a Hetzner server but unfortunately my budget is way less than that.

Sign In or Register to comment.