Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RAID 1 VS RAID 5

13»

Comments

  • edited November 2017

    @Maounique said:
    I cant figure out why anyone would need one that does JBOD.

    >

    ZFS, in my case. It's designed to deal directly with the disks, and RAID arrays will mess with it. It has it's own parity, mirror, and caching capabilities, so it doesn't need all those functions on an ancillary discrete card.

    There is also BTRFS, which is similar or it's supposed to be anyway.

    KVM can dedicate raw disks to VMs. I think vSphere and Xen might be able to do the same thing, but I don't remember.

    Alternately, the application could deal with spreading the data across the disks on it's own and incremental capacity is the only thing needed.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
Sign In or Register to comment.