Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Who preferred KVM for vps hosting?

ben_adictben_adict Member
edited January 2012 in General

Hello

Who preferred KVM for vps hosting?

Is this good offer than Xen-HVM?

Comments

  • KVM is the closest virtualisation technique to a true dedicated server. That is why many, including me, prefer it.

  • KVM is awesome :P

    Thanked by 2Infinity tux
  • i prefer KVM for my client. but i always looking OpenVZ for playing around. :D

  • I have to admit that my first experiences with KVM weren't happy ones. Granted that was a problem with me not expecting me to have to install the OS myself as well as not reading the emails @miTgiB sent out.

  • fanfan Veteran

    KVM is my choice now, for the freedom to do almost anything inside a VPS like a real dedicated server and the lower density compared with OpenVZ.

  • InfinityInfinity Member, Host Rep

    KVM is my number one choice, I love it. My first experience was, this is long but I got used to it. There isn't much setting up and stuff to do.

  • KuJoeKuJoe Member, Host Rep

    I used to prefer Xen, but now I prefer OpenVZ due to the ease of management, setup and control. From a client perspective, I don't really have a preference and use all kinds for my personal use.

  • LV_MattLV_Matt Member
    edited January 2012

    @drmike said: I have to admit that my first experiences with KVM weren't happy ones. Granted that was a problem with me not expecting me to have to install the OS myself as well as not reading the emails @miTgiB sent out.

    Actually @drmike you can actually have a template system, we have currently implemented a basic version of it but we are looking to replace it within the next month with our new system which is much easier for clients to re-install compared to our current ISOs.

    Send me a quick PM on here and I will get you a link to test our KVM services out for a couple of hours.

    You wont be going on a production node but one of our testing ones will be okay for some quick testing by you.

    I am aware SolusVM have implemented a Network Install function using PXE but that is still not working how I would like it too.

  • @LV_Matt said: I am aware SolusVM have implemented a Network Install function using PXE but that is still not working how I would like it too.

    PXE can use all sorts of things, it's not Solus borking it, but the menuing and kickstart being a limitation of it. Delta was working on something of a template system that would mount the VM's disk in the host node and dump a template in along with boot blocks but I don't recall how much progress he's made with it.

  • @Mon5t3r said: i prefer KVM for my client. but i always looking OpenVZ for playing around. :D

    @fan said: KVM is my choice now, for the freedom to do almost anything inside a VPS like a real dedicated server and the lower density compared with OpenVZ.

    @KuJoe said: I used to prefer Xen, but now I prefer OpenVZ

    I think the OP was asking for comparisons of KVM vs Xen HVM :)

  • @sleddog said: I think the OP was asking for comparisons of KVM vs Xen HVM :)

    A topic already discussed several times, I guess :P

    Thanked by 2Mon5t3r tux
  • @miTgiB said: PXE can use all sorts of things, it's not Solus borking it, but the menuing and kickstart being a limitation of it.

    Exactly what I was meaning, as we have shown there is a few much better alternatives to it.

    I will be reducing information on it within the next month too a week on how its been done.

  • ramnetramnet Member, Host Rep

    KVM vs Xen HVM - they are basically identical. Both use Qemu to provide the actual visualization, and thus both will behave basically the same way.

  • @ramnet said: both will behave basically the same way.

    You'd think that, but there are subtle differences between them and KVM gets my vote for the superior tech. I have a client that wanted to encrypt their filesystem and use gentoo, Xen HVM couldn't boot it, KVM asked for what was next.

  • ben_adictben_adict Member
    edited January 2012

    @ramnet KVM vs Xen HVM - they are basically identical. Both use Qemu to provide the actual visualization, and thus both will behave basically the same way.

    I have just tried KVM, i am so impressed than Xen-HVM. But how marketing?

Sign In or Register to comment.