New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Need a Replacement for BudgetNode/PioHost
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
That's all the pussy you'll be getting
It's @adamBB's beauty
Do you take pictures for customers servers too?
We want ours, labelled with our company name!
Why are your QFX's in VC mode? Surely they would be put in Junos fusion if you have MX's. The hardware and software layers in those QFX's is quite interesting, given it's just a beefy switch.
'Surely' there is no single correct setup.
There is a reason behind it - we want logical And physical separation so that the location can whitstand even if there are issues with the core router. We can run each location from another location
Clearly we do something right if we're known for the quality here ;-).
Just saw those welcome pack things on your Instagram, do all customers get one or is it just for specific services? They look awesome.
Was just curious of the reasoning, I know there are many reasons to do it many different ways.
I did a cool virtual chassis fabric deployment in Virtus a couple of months ago with 4 spine QFX5100's and 16 leaf nodes, they're quite punchy even if they're a pain to rack. Although worryingly one of the leaf nodes already failed last week. Next time you're in Virtus if you see a big new cage in data hall 1 you know what's in it now. :-)
Also curious because today I hopefully I'll have time to unbox some QFX1500's for my own deployment, and get some Junos fusion going. It made a lot more sense considering QFX1500's turn out to be a lot more economical than buying another MPC and MIC.
@Clouvider :P
@Infinity welcome in the neighbourhood:-).
It is cheaper surprisingly I agree, it wouldn't save us much in our case as we needed guaranteed throughout for the core links and that's ultimately MICs and MPCs anyway.
@MikePT we can take a picture of the server, not a problem :-). It's against our policy to label them with anything other than generic numbers, so you cannot guess the device's function without heaving access to our systems. That's for security reasons.
???
That makes sense.
Anxiouuuuuuuuuus!
perhaps he meant "having" !
I guess, I go buy a slice.
Good choice!
Closed by @Neoon request.