Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Please share your Inceptionhosting VPS uptime

sonicsonic Veteran
edited December 2016 in Requests

Luckily i got 1 OVZ US last Cyber Monday with Inceptionhosting. We all know Inceptionhosting is a good, reliable provider.

I have one important website running on Linode 4GB VPS, uptime is 162 days and couting. Now i want to transfer this site to my new box at Inceptionhosting.

Linode VPS specs:
4 GB RAM
2 CPU Cores
48 GB SSD Storage
3 TB Transfer
40 Gbps Network In
250 Mbps Network Out

Inceptionhosting VPS specs:
Access to 2 x vCPU Cores
6144MB RAM
6144MB vSWAP
100 GB HDD (Raid 10)
1 x IPv4
/64 IPv6
1600 GB Bandwidth @ gbit

Normal load:

Is it good decision when i move my site to Inceptionhosting? Mind to share your uptime with Inceptionhosting :)

BTW, tks Ant for great offer!

Comments

  • yomeroyomero Member
    edited December 2016
    # uptime
    10:50:57 up 256 days, 21:35,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    

    A Phoenix KVM cheap as chips =P

    Thanked by 1sonic
  • bugrakocbugrakoc Member
    edited December 2016

    I don't see any downsides to that. I'd say go ahead.

    A better option would be to deploy HA on both of the boxes. Depends on your budget tho.

  • @bugrakoc said:

    A better option would be to deploy HA on both of the boxes.

    @sonic, if uptime is as much of a concern as you make it out to be, this is the correct answer.

    Thanked by 1bugrakoc
  • @yomero said:

    > # uptime
    > 10:50:57 up 256 days, 21:35,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    > 

    A Phoenix KVM cheap as chips =P

    Look promise :D

    @bugrakoc said:
    I don't see any downsides to that. I'd say go ahead.

    A better option would be to deploy HA on both of the boxes. Depends on your budget tho.

    I'm a newbie, dont have enough skill to deploy HA. :D

    @Nekki said:

    @bugrakoc said:

    A better option would be to deploy HA on both of the boxes.

    @sonic, if uptime is as much of a concern as you make it out to be, this is the correct answer.

    Tks @Nekki

  • Check ioping before transfer site

    Thanked by 1sonic
  • As Nekki and bugrakoc said, you have to setup a high availability scenario if uptime is such a matter for you.
    Get your 4GB box from IH (great guy, excellent provider) and install your site there.
    Then, get another cheap box with 4GB elsewhere and setup a mirror of your website there, with frequent rsync crons (it depends on how often do you update the website) and a mysql replication.
    You can either get a third small vps just for monitoring and dns to move your visitors from IH's vps (if it gets down) to your backup vps.
    Some solutions are those:

    Thanked by 2sonic bersy
Sign In or Register to comment.