New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
I'm getting around 65MB/s disk speeds on a XC 2016 sata. It's kind of slow, I'm also guessing it will be throttling the [average] download speed?
I don't see how SATA II vs III is an issue here since there's no way a cheap 7200 rpm drive can get anywhere close to saturating SATA II anyway. Perhaps they mean there's a bug in SATA in general that's slowing it down to 10% of what SATA II could achieve...
65MB/s is around half of what I'd say is reasonable to expect. I usually get 170-180 on other sata servers.
Any word on limited editions ?
Some of the last dates were:
So we might expect something very soon
Still being palmed off by support, no update yet despite them saying they were expecting a fix over a month ago.
Still nothing...
@abermingham this, plus the network issues some XCs are having really isn't good. Any progress?
As I prepare my mind to order a Dedibox XC 2016, Just want to know if this I/O bug is know resolved or is it still there ?
This is my Dedi XC 2015
Tested in the wrong directory.
^ Thread is about the 2016 model, not 2015, but those speeds don't look like a disk (SSD or HDD). I'm guessing your /tmp partition is mounted as tmpfs or similar.
Your right it was, oops.
As to the models, I was aware, just thought it might be useful to have a data point from a 2015 model.
找客服吧,Online.net 家的硬盘经常是坏的
My XC SSD 2016 in France, I will be ordering Amsterdam location later this month and we will see.
Do they still install Samsung PM871 disks ? It was random in 2015 machines - many Intel models, Samsung etc.
[root@onlinecity ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/test bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 11.9756 s, 87.6 MB/s [root@onlinecity ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/test bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 12.2648 s, 85.5 MB/s
English here, only English please...
@jvnadr
Why you so mean??
Just keep scrolling
I would also prefer to understand what I read here. And he is right - This in an english forum. I don't bother you with my german too. ;-)
@Amitz I know that, but when you talk german I will be kind and will tell you that in your profile not here.
I think we all should have a drink [or any other favorite relaxant]. :-)
It's not that he was abusive. Maybe there was an edit, but I just see
which is completely okay in my eyes. But I think we're wasting time here: One Love!
I am not mean. I just want to be able to understand. This is an English forum and I will not going to start a conversation in Greek (no, it's indeed all Greek to me because I am Greek!). If people starts to use his own language here, then LET will become Babel's Tower...
No, it was not an edit and I think I was not rude. If @Jorbox believe I was, I assure it was not my intentions...
Ok, I got an XC 2016 within 2 mins of ordering... impressive.
I did confirm them in a ticket before ordering about the BIOS bug and they confirmed it is resolved.
Here are the tests... in full
SAMSUNG MZ7LN256 | Revision: "100Q"
Good Enough ??
Any Tips to improve performance... I'm using Debian 8.5
Secondly...
What do you recommend for Virtualization on Debian ?
Easiest of all to manage via GUI (minimal LXDE)
XEN(XCP) vs. ProxMox vs. qemu-kvm vs. VirtualBox
which one is easiest of all to manage?
Depends what kind of reads and writes you're doing. 12.5MB/s could be normal for a SATA II drive.
No. I've got the same SSD in a system without the BIOS problem, and those speeds are too low.
Please check your smartctl:
smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep SATA SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
It's so annoying when you have a controller and an SSD drive which are 6.0 GB/s capable. It was working well in the 2015 XC SSD model. Is your drive new ?
Mine was and now has 4546 Power on Hours with 97% MWI, so 3% used so far.
So this was reported in April 2016 and it is still not fixed?
this is XC ssd ams1
dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 11.265 s, 95.3 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1M count=1000 conv=fdatasync 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 10.4034 s, 101 MB/s
SATA 2 or SATA 3 ?
Actually on the 17th March
So what Speeds are you getting on your box ? What numbers should I be expecting
Forgot to check--- indeed it seems I'm connected on a 3gbps port. Is there something I can do myself or shall I raise the ticket ?
smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep SATA
smartctl --xall /dev/sda | grep Power_On
dmesg | grep -i sata | grep 'link up'
hdparm -I /dev/sda | egrep "Model|speed|Transport"
look like this is not bug.
on their site displayed as SATA2
https://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server/dedibox-xc