Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Any experience with Berry.pw ?

How is their network and do they suspend if you receive a DDoS attack?

Comments

  • edited January 2016

    Would be interested too, they seem to be pretty sweet.

  • I don't know, but they seem to be berry nice.

  • They do seem to have cheap berries.

    Thanked by 1theroyalstudent
  • When I first saw their domain name, I thought they were renting Raspberry PI Servers..... Either way they look pretty cool

  • @SimplexHosts said:
    When I first saw their domain name, I thought they were renting Raspberry PI Servers..... Either way they look pretty cool

    Well, even their (parent) brand sounds good, Epidrive.

  • @Epidrive - dazzle us! :)

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    Didn't they recently attempt to sell the brand?

  • Source?

    Anyway, my experience with them has been nothing but good. I cobbled together some generic benchmarks here and here if anyone wants to get a general idea.

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    Didn't they recently attempt to sell the brand?

  • @k0nsl said:
    Source?

    Anyway, my experience with them has been nothing but good. I cobbled together some generic benchmarks here and here if anyone wants to get a general idea.

    Seems to be a very decent VPS if one would want a better CPU. Sadly, https://portal.catalysthost.com/cart.php?a=confproduct&i=1 seems to be a better deal at the moment.

  • Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    k0nsl said: Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    https://vpsboard.com/topic/7878-usa-vps-host-for-sale-huge-clientbase/?do=findComment&comment=101621

    Also looks like I emailed the address in the post at one point

    From: Web Host webhostforsale22@gmail.com
    10/8/15

    to me
    Hello Alex,

    This is Bryson. VPS host for sale is berry.pw

    So not sure if the they still own it.

    Thanked by 1Jonchun
  • @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    read the comments, especialy drmike and domainbop

  • @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    Let's be real here. This is a relatively "small" industry. Yes, it's oversaturated but when you're looking at a host that has ~700 clients, it basically cuts off the majority of the no-names that no one has ever heard of. On top of this, 870 services with an annual income of $5k? Assuming an average of $10/year per service (coincides perfectly with berry servers), you'd get ~$8k revenue annually. If you remove the cost of IPs and one or two very overloaded servers, it matches ~$5k. No matter how you look at it, at this price point anyone who hangs out around vpsboard/LET will have heard of them and the best-matching service is berry servers.

    Thanked by 1Epidrive
  • They also seem to be getting berry few traffic

    Thanked by 1yomero
  • Aha, thanks! The e-mail makes it clear to me.

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    Also looks like I emailed the address in the post at one point

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    I have a couple of the ultra-cheap berry.pw 128s. Can't really say anything bad about them - and the support when I did have an account question was really quick.

    I wouldn't run anything important on them...

    Thanked by 1Jonchun
  • @raindog308 said:
    I have a couple of the ultra-cheap berry.pw 128s. Can't really say anything bad about them - and the support when I did have an account question was really quick.

    I wouldn't run anything important on them...

    Would you mind posting the specs of your servers? How are their networks?

  • @VPSaddict We have couple of improvements in line for berry. Servers purchased now have high chance to be deployed in our e3-1271v3's. Depending on the severity of the DDoS, we normally suspend, or suspend with fee, or terminate.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    VPSAddict said: Would you mind posting the specs of your servers? How are their networks?

    Sure. Here's the standard, with my IP and hostname removed. I haven't really used it much yet, so I can't answer beyond what you see below.

    Uptime would be due to me rebooting, not the provider. VPS is in Phoenix, AZ but I forget which DC.

    Benchmark started on Tue Jan 19 22:31:47 EST 2016
    Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log
    
    System Info
    -----------
    Processor   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1271 v3 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU Cores   : 2
    Frequency   : 800.000 MHz
    Memory      : 128 MB
    Swap        : 128 MB
    Uptime      : 9 days, 50 min,
    
    OS      : Debian GNU/Linux 7
    Arch        : i686 (32 Bit)
    Kernel      : 2.6.32-042stab108.6
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    71.8MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      44.7MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   63.8MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   59.4MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   84.4MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   15.2MB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      12.8MB/s 
    Singapore       Softlayer   11.6MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     14.7MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    83.2MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 137 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 149 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 129 MB/s
    Average I/O : 138.333 MB/s
    
    + ioping -Dc 10 .
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=62 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=121 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=100 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=105 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=101 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=88 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=109 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=113 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=95 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=100 us
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 10.1 k iops, 39.3 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 62 us / 99 us / 121 us / 15 us
    + ioping -Dc 10 -s 256k .
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=306 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=373.0 ms
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=316 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=278 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=323 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=330 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=309 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=332 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=303 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=335 us
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9.38 s, 26 iops, 6.65 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 278 us / 37.6 ms / 373.0 ms / 111.8 ms
    + ioping -DR .
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    68.1 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 23.4 k iops, 91.6 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 30 us / 42 us / 289.7 ms / 1.16 ms
    + ioping -DR -s 256k .
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    11.1 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 3.91 k iops, 978.1 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 223 us / 255 us / 1.47 ms / 19 us
    + ioping -Cc 10 .
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=5 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=3 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=4 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=4 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=4 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=3 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=5 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=4 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=12 us
    4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=3 us
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 212.8 k iops, 831.1 MiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 3 us / 4 us / 12 us / 2 us
    + ioping -Cc 10 -s 256k .
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=25 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=41 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=42 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=52 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=58 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=58 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=54 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=40 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=44 us
    256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=39 us
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 22.1 k iops, 5.39 GiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 25 us / 45 us / 58 us / 9 us
    + ioping -CR .
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    2.13 M requests completed in 3.00 s, 912.6 k iops, 3.48 GiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0 us / 1 us / 543 us / 1 us
    + ioping -CR -s 256k .
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
    83.8 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 28.2 k iops, 6.88 GiB/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 15 us / 35 us / 297 us / 7 us
    
  • @Epidrive said:
    VPSaddict We have couple of improvements in line for berry. Servers purchased now have high chance to be deployed in our e3-1271v3's. Depending on the severity of the DDoS, we normally suspend, or suspend with fee, or terminate.

    Can we work out a deal on bandwidth upgrades?

  • @VPSAddict Yes, if you send in a ticket we can discuss about your requirements.

  • @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    More explicitly stated than the vpsboard link: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1520891

    Thanked by 1k0nsl
Sign In or Register to comment.