Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

(WTB) Highly reliable VPS

sijie123sijie123 Member
edited January 2016 in Requests

Switching over from Wordpress.com because they're being a douche.

Looking for a VPS that's less than 20 USD yearly.

Criteria:

+Most importantly, I need a reliable host. #gvh

+Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore. - That pretty much exclude the EU.

+Min 512MB RAM. The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.

+15GB+ HDD - No need SSD, HDD with cache would be good enough.

Please give me some suggestions!

P.S. I have server management knowledge, don't worry about that. Only used wordpress.com because I couldn't be bothered to set one up.

Comments

  • Ramnode

  • Some phrases that do not belong in the same sentence:

    less than 20 USD yearly.

    .

    Highly reliable VPS

  • @Jonchun said:
    Some phrases that do not belong in the same sentence:

    @xaitmi said:
    Ramnode

    @jonchun Ramnode is one. I personally use Ramnode (15USD Yearly) but it doesn't fit my requirements this time. It has dispropotionately more disk space than RAM.
    Kudos to them, still, for the great service though!

  • http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/72029/impact-vps-winter-holiday-2015-50-off-recurring-and-double-credits

    The $12/yr 512MB is short on storage (10GB), but the $24/yr 1GB has 15GB. Been reliable for me and based in Seattle, so it's a pretty good location for Asia.

  • xaitmixaitmi Member
    edited January 2016

    HostUs.

    Their thread http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/51204/hostus-custom-control-panel-768mb-10-y-2gb-35-y-6gb-18-q

    It says $10 a year, but it's actually $12 due to a recent price increase.

    Special 2 (768MB)
    
    768MB RAM 
    768MB vSwap 
    1 vCPU Core (Fair Share) 
    20GB Disk space 
    2TB Bandwidth 
    1Gbit/s port 
    1 x IPv4 Address 
    Free IPv6 Addresses 
    Atlanta, GA | Los Angeles, CA | Dallas, TX 
    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • bersybersy Member
    edited January 2016

    Seems http://littlehappycloud.net/ Singapore is out of stock at this moment. I have been using them (NL location) for six months, InceptionHosting is reliable enough, it's value for money.

    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • edited January 2016

    @xaitmi said:
    HostUs.

    @sijie123 said:
    Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore.

    testing from Singtel:

    HostUS Atlanta, USA:

    PING 162.245.216.243 (162.245.216.243): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=304.037 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=462.486 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=444.234 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=351.776 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=313.171 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=466.190 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=450.280 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=229.915 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=243.802 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=245.566 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=246.405 ms
    ^C
    --- 162.245.216.243 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 229.915/341.624/466.190/92.994 ms
    

    HostUS Washington DC, USA:

    PING 216.189.157.2 (216.189.157.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=263.160 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=270.530 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=250.134 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=258.125 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=270.582 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=264.279 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=256.603 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=268.016 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=268.283 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=251.881 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=269.828 ms
    ^C
    --- 216.189.157.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 250.134/262.856/270.582/7.193 ms
    

    HostUS Dallas #2, USA:

    PING 104.128.239.2 (104.128.239.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=201.296 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=222.384 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=219.989 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=217.616 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=213.466 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=404.647 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=385.242 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=369.282 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=46 time=228.429 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=46 time=461.378 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=44 time=428.641 ms
    ^C
    --- 104.128.239.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 201.296/304.761/461.378/98.593 ms
    

    HostUS Dallas #2, USA (best):

    PING 45.58.55.2 (45.58.55.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=265.285 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=309.422 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=289.505 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=269.444 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=192.405 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=206.051 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=215.587 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=45 time=206.871 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=193.850 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=204.035 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=47 time=215.854 ms
    ^C
    --- 45.58.55.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 192.405/233.483/309.422/39.803 ms
    

    HostUS Los Angeles, USA (close to being the best):

    PING 216.189.149.3 (216.189.149.3): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=209.862 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=211.989 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=202.040 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=226.461 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=230.417 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=207.123 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=330.652 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=413.728 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=200.823 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=195.177 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=185.321 ms
    ^C
    --- 216.189.149.3 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 185.321/237.599/413.728/66.987 ms
    

    EDIT: I personally use DigitalOcean for any WP sites that I host, they're pretty decent.

    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • @bersy said:
    Seems http://littlehappycloud.net/ Singapore is out of stock at this moment. I have been using them (NL location) for six months, InceptionHosting is reliable enough, it's value for money.

    Benchmark started on Sun Jan 17 07:25:03 GMT 2016
    Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log
    
    System Info
    -----------
    Processor   : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    CPU Cores   : 1
    Frequency   : 2400.072 MHz
    Memory      : 112 MB
    Swap        : 127 MB
    Uptime      : 4 days, 13:29,
    
    OS      : Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
    Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel      : 3.13.0-24-generic
    Hostname    : unicorns
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is unicorns
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    5.06MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      1.45MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   1.54MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   1.71MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   1.87MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   614KB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      3.94MB/s 
    Singapore       Softlayer   71.6MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     1.58MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    1.28MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 152 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 156 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 121 MB/s
    Average I/O : 143 MB/s
    
  • For good latency to singapore and reliable that budget is going to be abit hard.

    I personally use DO, LSW,Vultr,Inception LES. but i think most exceed your budget.

    LA could be good but latency will be around 180+ - 200+.

  • Why VPS? Why not a normal shared hosting account?

  • @Junkless said:
    Why VPS? Why not a normal shared hosting account?

    Better isolation from noisy neighbours and more importantly, better protection from retarded providers.
    The last time I used a shared hosting I was kicked off for "high CPU and bandwidth usage".
    I'd also like root access, that's why.

  • You might want to increase your budget then.

  • LA's your best bet, reliable and $20 yearly don't really work well together

  • edited January 2016

    @century1stop said:
    LA's your best bet, reliable and $20 yearly don't really work well together

    Or @sijie123 could try LittleHappyCloud SG (when its available again), and maybe get suspended for abusive CPU and/or disk I/O usage?

    LHC SG is the only cheap solution if a really low latency connection is needed, though.

    Anyway, on LHC SG, I run my cron backup job that causes peak 20mb/s disk I/O for a minute or two every hour, basically compressing a folder filled with Git repos and uploading them to Amazon Cloud Drive, that doesn't seem to get me suspended (just yet?)

    If you want, I can let you test out one of my LHC nodes, just contact me via PM and I will get it wiped.

  • @sijie123 said:
    Switching over from Wordpress.com because they're being a douche.

    Looking for a VPS that's less than 20 USD yearly.

    Criteria:

    +Most importantly, I need a reliable host. #gvh

    +Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore. - That pretty much exclude the EU.

    +Min 512MB RAM. The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.

    +15GB+ HDD - No need SSD, HDD with cache would be good enough.

    Please give me some suggestions!

    P.S. I have server management knowledge, don't worry about that. Only used wordpress.com because I couldn't be bothered to set one up.

    Get a VPS in LA

    HostUS is a great company cheap,reliable,amazing service and support 11$/year or 12

    and use CF for some DDOS and CDN protection

    or get a 256 MB vps Hostus at Hongkong $25/year that will give you some routing benefits

  • @simonindia said:
    256 MB vps Hostus at Hongkong $25/year that will give you some routing benefits

    $25/year for a 256MB box sounds too overpriced, but provided its in HK, sounds okay, though I wouldn't go for that still, since as OP said, "The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.".

    LA would be good for serving stuff to SG, though.

    CF is fine, but if OP wants to burn some money, he could maybe get something else 2-3 hops away from local users if it makes such a big difference... EdgeCast (via JoDiHost) sounds fine.

    I get 150-160mbps from EdgeCast CDN, when I was downloading firmware files via direct URLs, through my PC, I would prefer them over CF in the future when I want to push something important to production.

  • @theroyalstudent said:
    I get 150-160mbps from EdgeCast CDN, when I was downloading firmware files via direct URLs, through my PC, I would prefer them over CF in the future when I want to push something important to production.

    i created a page rule to cache everything under a particular url then i place things like script and other there so when i request they are lightning fast but regarding OP's requirement i would suggest some thing in LA that's the best any one can do at this point

Sign In or Register to comment.