New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Crappy network, also.
You didn't get it either.
It appears evident they can guarantee 100mbit/s for each customer who wants to use it.
That is exactly what is guaranteed.
No.. you are implying that their network is overloaded, which it isn't. All my online.net servers perform outrageously well and I use my guaranteed bandwidth 24/7/365. Even then there's plenty of room on top to download a file at 500-700 mbit/s. Even on all my kidéchires.
a kimsufi dedi is cheaper and better specs too
Source? Where do they explain what the guarantee means so that you can be so sure that's what it means? Also, it's not a very strong guarantee then, as it allows your bandwidth to drop to zero in any 100ms window.
Wicked. Have you performed measurements to see what fraction of the packets you send actually arrive at their destination, and graphed it over 1/10/100/1000ms windows to see what quality of bandwidth you really have? If not, how can you be so sure it isn't "overloaded" and performs "outrageously well"?
This is why no one likes you. You just argue for the sake of arguing.
I don't think that's the reason (that is, haters gonna hate, regardless).
I don't argue for the sake of arguing. I argue in order to understand things better. Just going by price, I think there is likely a difference between bandwidth at 6EUR/200Mbit and real commit at $200/200Mbit (for percieved "low quality" HE/Cogent). Differences between Europe and U.S. markets cannot easily explain a factor of 30x. I think it would be appropriate to actually make some measurements before declaring that they are the same thing. FYI, I'm vaguely planning to actually make such measurements.