Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

2 SSD with HW raid 0 speed

it seems not good?
what's yours?

this results is 2*250g SSD with HW raid 0

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=512 oflag=dsync 2>&1 && rm -f test

512+0 records in
512+0 records out
33554432 bytes (34 MB) copied, 0.535626 s, 62.6 MB/s

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync 2>&1 | tail -n 1 && rm -f test

268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.627032 s, 428 MB/s

Comments

  • What is the RAID controller make/model and what are the SSD's make/model?

  • vpsteavpstea Member
    edited September 2015
    # fdisk -l
    
    Disk /dev/sda: 479.0 GB, 479023071232 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 58237 cylinders, total 935591936 sectors
    Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
    Disk identifier: 0x000f2de5
    
       Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
    /dev/sda1   *        2048      391167      194560   83  Linux
    /dev/sda2          393214   935589887   467598337    5  Extended
    /dev/sda5          393216     2344959      975872   82  Linux swap / Solaris
    /dev/sda6         2347008   935589887   466621440   83  Linux
    
    
    # df -h
    Filesystem                                              Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    rootfs                                                  439G  830M  415G   1% /
    udev                                                     10M     0   10M   0% /dev
    tmpfs                                                   3.2G  196K  3.2G   1% /run
    /dev/disk/by-uuid/29de65ab-1ba5-4e7b-96ab-ea5a98b8f369  439G  830M  415G   1% /
    tmpfs                                                   5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
    tmpfs                                                   6.5G     0  6.5G   0% /run/shm
    /dev/sda1                                               184M   23M  153M  13% /boot
    
  • vpsteavpstea Member
    edited September 2015

    dmesg |grep -i raid

    [ 1.591183] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 1.591615] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591619] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591624] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591628] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591633] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 47 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591637] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 48 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591642] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 49 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.591646] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: irq 50 for MSI/MSI-X [ 1.711204] scsi0 : LSI SAS based MegaRAID driver

  • vpsteavpstea Member
    edited September 2015
    lspci -vv | grep -i raid
    02:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2208 [Thunderbolt] (rev 05)
        Kernel driver in use: megaraid_sas
    
  • SSDBlazeSSDBlaze Member, Host Rep

    @MarkTurner said:
    What is the RAID controller make/model and what are the SSD's make/model?

    Any knowledge on what the OP posted above?

    @vpstea
    I'm assuming you don't know if the SSDs are Intels or Samsungs? Or what model?

  • perennateperennate Member, Host Rep

    The speed seems pretty reasonable. You should see much higher random I/O performance than HDD, but sequential performance won't be significantly better (depending on model).

    Thanked by 1jar
  • what is the model?

    # smartctl --all /dev/sda1
    smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [x86_64-linux-3.2.0-4-amd64] (local build)
    Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
    
    Vendor:               LSI     
    Product:              MR9271-4i       
    Revision:             3.19
    User Capacity:        479,023,071,232 bytes [479 GB]
    Logical block size:   512 bytes
    Logical Unit id:      0x600605b005d002301d95d9d609a59694
    Serial number:        009496a509d6d9951d3002d005b00506
    Device type:          disk
    Local Time is:        Thu Sep 24 01:30:40 2015 EDT
    Device does not support SMART
    
    Error Counter logging not supported
    Device does not support Self Test logging
    
  • What is the server cpu ? Maybe I/O are limited by cpu.

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member
    edited September 2015

    vpstea said: what is the model?

    That shows the RAID controller, but not the make/model of SSDs.

    9271 I think is a Megaraid, so you should be able to run:

    megacli -PDList -a0

    and get a list of the disks on the system. What are the disks and what is their link speed?

    To give you a comparison, on a single lowly Samsung 850 Evo:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.40805 s, 446 MB/s

    You are getting that throughput from 2 disks

  • quadhostquadhost Member
    edited September 2015

    What disks are they is the real question as to if they are performing well.

  • BharatBBharatB Patron Provider, Veteran

    lsblk -io KNAME,TYPE,SIZE,MODEL , use that command to know disk model

  • BharatB said: lsblk -io KNAME,TYPE,SIZE,MODEL , use that command to know disk model

    This won't work with a RAID controller, the RAID controller will just report its model as the disk name.

  • BharatBBharatB Patron Provider, Veteran

    @MarkTurner said:

    What about , lshw -class disk

  • BharatB said: What about , lshw -class disk

    You need to interrogate the RAID controller with the command I put above.

  • @MarkTurner said:
    To give you a comparison, on a single lowly Samsung 850 Evo:

    250GB ?

  • DalComp said: 250GB ?

    Yes

  • i just got the server 1 day, raid card bad...
    they are resolving it.

Sign In or Register to comment.