New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
StormVZ Benchmark
ServerSharp
Member, Host Rep
Comments
And for people that can't be bothered to click the link:
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Process Creation 1 2 3 4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: svz.dominicl.me: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab057.1 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 02:17:07 MSD 2012 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6386.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6384.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 15:34:01 up 2:28, 0 users, load average: 0.01, 1.17, 2.56; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 08 2012 15:34:01 - 16:02:11 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16645330.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2783.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5243.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 884573.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 236901.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2156321.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1731396.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 180182.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16714.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8804.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2684.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2030896.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16645330.3 1426.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2783.7 506.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 5243.3 1219.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 884573.8 2233.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 236901.4 1431.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2156321.8 3717.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1731396.5 1391.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 180182.9 450.5 Process Creation 126.0 16714.1 1326.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8804.1 2076.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2684.6 4474.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2030896.2 1353.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1478.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 08 2012 16:02:11 - 16:30:25 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 53421334.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 10641.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 22401.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 889859.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 230280.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2595179.8 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5686742.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 534018.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 49078.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20578.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2444.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 6027429.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 53421334.5 4577.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10641.3 1934.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 22401.1 5209.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 889859.3 2247.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 230280.6 1391.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2595179.8 4474.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5686742.2 4571.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 534018.3 1335.0 Process Creation 126.0 49078.7 3895.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20578.2 4853.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2444.7 4074.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 6027429.6 4018.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3215.0IO Ping:
DD:
Thanks :P
Awesome, thanks
Freevps bench
PS : Emails from whmcs were sitting at spam folder. just a pointer to the host and the people who were expecting the welcome mails.
there is no problem for yahoo mail. mails are all in inbox.
Thanks for that guys! Good to see stable results coming through
Pretty good results here also.
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency : 3192.987 MHz
Total amount of ram : 256 MB
Total amount of swap : 0 MB
Download speed from CacheFly: 38.7MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 3.42MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 4.19MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 989KB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 97.7MB/s
Download speed from LeaseWeb, Haarlem, NL: 56.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.24MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.07MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 12.3MB/s
I/O speed : 131 MB/s
Is this from their free vps trial?
tun/tap enabled?
@shin Yes and yes
Nice and good
For the first time I found europe vps, which has low latency to my country.
Ping statistics for 109.200.26.***:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 221ms, Average = 220ms
Rarely connections from indonesia to europe countries without going through usa.
1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 20 ms 19 ms 25 ms 180..112.1
3 49 ms 23 ms 22 ms 189.subnet125-160-11.speedy.telkom.net.id [125.1
60.11.189]
4 19 ms 18 ms 30 ms 61.94.114.101
5 45 ms 42 ms 43 ms 226.128.240.180.telin.sg [180.240.128.226]
6 40 ms 40 ms 41 ms 225.128.240.180.telin.sg [180.240.128.225]
7 43 ms 82 ms 41 ms ix-0-1-3-0.tcore2.SVW-Singapore.as6453.net [180.
87.15.117]
8 220 ms 220 ms 218 ms if-10-2.tcore1.MLV-Mumbai.as6453.net [180.87.15.
146]
9 225 ms * 217 ms if-9-5.tcore1.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.2
17.17]
10 220 ms 225 ms 222 ms if-2-2.tcore2.WYN-Marseille.as6453.net [80.231.2
17.2]
11 226 ms 224 ms 225 ms if-9-2.tcore2.L78-London.as6453.net [80.231.200.
14]
12 225 ms 216 ms 214 ms Vlan756.icore2.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231.131
.26]
13 218 ms 218 ms 217 ms Vlan550.icore2.LDN-London.as6453.net [80.231.20.
14]
14 220 ms 221 ms 223 ms h176-227-222-150.host.redstation.co.uk [176.227.
222.150]
15 221 ms 222 ms 221 ms 18-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk [109.
200.26.18]
16 221 ms 222 ms 221 ms ***-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk [109.
200.26.]
Trace complete.
Better than usa westcoast connection I think.
@Bayu Thanks for the comment! We do love our DC's network
Here is mine from the 8th: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/08/5ByaupbYTMl64pNo
Very good ping/traceroute from Iceland.
traceroute to 5.152.202.146 (5.152.202.146), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 213.181.99.1 (213.181.99.1) 1.005 ms 1.003 ms 1.187 ms
2 IPnet-gw.157.157.20.29.simnet.is (157.157.20.29) 1.184 ms 1.506 ms 1.512 ms
3 157.157.255.187 (157.157.255.187) 2.196 ms 2.226 ms 2.251 ms
4 172.16.100.201 (172.16.100.201) 40.852 ms 41.284 ms 41.092 ms
5 linx.redstation.net.uk (195.66.225.138) 41.485 ms 41.230 ms 41.494 ms
6 h176-227-222-150.host.redstation.co.uk (176.227.222.150) 44.370 ms 51.702 ms 51.727 ms
7 18-26-200-109.rackcentre.redstation.net.uk (109.200.26.18) 43.944 ms 43.959 ms 43.883 ms
8 h5-152-202-146.host.redstation.co.uk (5.152.202.146) 43.960 ms 43.977 ms 43.988 ms
Ping towards UK and Europe destinations is definitely better than other VPS's I tried before, even the expensive ones. get-iplayer is beautifully fast and CPU is good, too.
Good to hear positive reviews, we are in the process of getting a server up in Dallas, Texas in the US right now. Hosted at Limestone network, similar spec CPU but v2 and SSD+SAS setup as this one.
Shoot me up a PM if you want to test it for a day or two since we are nearly ready for release, not giving a longer term. Will PM back in 24-72hrs.
LSN, got a node filled with KVM users not booting up properly, after their scheduled RAM upgrade of my node..
@Jack My account specialist is pretty much on the ball and very nice after some few phone calls we got every info we needed and hopefully won't need much support after setup (Currently being built now)