New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
SimpleNode 512MB 20GB 250GB OpenVZ Benchmark
ErawanArifNugroho
Member
We have SimpleNode with the 512MB VPS Promo. They are started as Minecraft GSP but started to offer an OpenVZ VPS. So here is the resources :
512MB Promo Resources : Memory 512 MB vSwap 256 MB Disk Space: 20 GB Bandwidth: 250GB OpenVZ 1 IPv4 Node Beryllium
CPU Info
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3491.925 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6983.85 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3491.925 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6983.85 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
Memory Info
# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 524288 kB MemFree: 347804 kB Cached: 150952 kB Active: 125496 kB Inactive: 38164 kB Active(anon): 12640 kB Inactive(anon): 68 kB Active(file): 112856 kB Inactive(file): 38096 kB Unevictable: 0 kB Mlocked: 0 kB SwapTotal: 262144 kB SwapFree: 262144 kB Dirty: 1232 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 12708 kB Shmem: 2624 kB Slab: 12768 kB SReclaimable: 10828 kB SUnreclaim: 1940 kB
Freevps.sh
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3491.925 MHz Total amount of ram : 512 MB Total amount of swap : 256 MB System uptime : 12 min, Download speed from CacheFly: 106MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 12.6MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 82.3MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.73MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 9.15MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.0MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.45MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 22.8MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 30.2MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 26.9MB/s I/O speed : 195 MB/s
Download Test
# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin --2012-08-18 03:33:50-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.bin' 100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 51.2M/s in 2.0s 2012-08-18 03:33:52 (51.2 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]
Thanked by 1SimpleNode
Comments
Inodes
Disk Space
IO Test
IOPING
Traceroute and Ping
UnixBench
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/18/ZHwUgQnVPoaYrVQr
Thanks
I have no idea why
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
is so poor. I'll look into it.Our older node that uses RAID1 instead of RAID10 gets better results... o.o
Why do you want to use oflag=dsync in the first place?
I'm using the same io benchmark by @serverbear
Well, it's for benchmarking I guess....
Oh well, I'm glad the other I/O tests are pretty good :P
We're adding FIO random reads and writes soon.
Dsync is purely there for comparison atm, we don't use it in any reports (but it may highlight issues).
Good benchmark tho.
@ErawanArifNugroho: if you want to say how much it costs also, that'd be awesome.
Besides for that, solid stats.
$6 :P
I'm actually pretty surprised by these results. We have a giant 100 player Tekkit (Minecraft mod pack that adds 200+ items to the game) server which uses a lot of resources running on that node, in addition to a few small servers.
We're planning on adding more drives to this node, as Minecraft really does use a lot of I/O.
With a Minecraft running, but having a stable 195mb/s is nice
@SimpleNode depend on kernel version and filesytem you're using. mostly the worst result for dsync is on kernel 32 and ext4 filesystem.
Incero really has a great network. Hardware looks good here too. Well done @SimpleNode
Hey, thanks! and indeed, their network is awesome.
what about me jarland
@Randy Give me some RAID10 benchmarks
@jarland, get ready, i will do my best i have been notified by LSN that the RAM Stocks should be ready by twmr OpenVZ here i come!
@Erawan and @ServerBear took out maxexcloo's job
I think I've underestimated how big the Minecraft server market is (runs off to write a Minecraft benchmarking tool).
@serverbear give it 1 year. It will be gone just like Other did.
Minecraft?
Yep. Judging MC forum and how kids are coming with free shits, it will either die for lack of trust or providers will simply quit for the lack of fare competition. Just my opinion.
You are killing my dreams. I was thinking of starting a Minecraft brand in the begining of October
MinecraftForums "Hosts" sorted by topic start date
New host launched every ~3-6 hours. 70% think a Core i5 is enough for handling 32GB of minecraft servers, or that a Kimsufi-24G with no RAID has enough I/O to cope with 24GB of minecraft servers (their nodes eventually fill up, and get customers complaining about world loading lag).
Minecraft situation is worst than cpanel hosting right now. On top of that, add dealing with little kids, cc charge without permission of parents and other fun.
Link I find this amusing.
I find that very realistic. But nobody ever got rich providing what people need, only providing what people want.
[removed]
@serverbear For some reason, on serverbear.com, searching "simplenode" doesn't get any results, even though erawan posted the stats here: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/18/ZHwUgQnVPoaYrVQr
Also "SimpleNode" on the benchmark page isn't a link like on other results.
I'm assuming that I just don't know how serverbear.com works :P. Do you have to manually verify results or something? O.o
I haven't added you guys yet, we don't auto generate hosts based on benchmarks added. Otherwise we'd have heaps of stuff we don't want appearing on the site.
I'll get you up there in a few hours.
So.... @serverbear ... :P