SSDVirt - SSD VPS Hosting - [KVM, E3 CPUs, 1Gbps, New York]

Comments

• gsrdgrdghd Member

  August 2012

  Do you have a test IP?
• john Member

  August 2012

  @gsrdgrdghd said: Do you have a test IP?

  You can ping or traceroute to 108.61.35.74.
• jar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

  August 2012

  I'm going to get your name and GridVirt's mixed up now, thanks :P

  More Texans in this business please! Welcome, neighbor.
• john Member

  August 2012

  @jarland said: More Texans in this business please! Welcome, neighbor.

  Glad to be here.
• bdtech Member

  August 2012

  Where in NY?
• john Member

  August 2012 edited August 2012

  @bdtech said: Where in NY?

  New York City Area, the exact address is 101 Possumtown Rd, Piscataway, NJ.
• mindfreak Member

  August 2012 edited August 2012

  @john do you allow BNC and Eggdrops? If so how much for extra IPs and offer rDNS? Any coupon for 512mb server?
• mindfreak Member

  August 2012

  @john bumping because I @ wrong person.
• john Member

  August 2012

  @mindfreak said: @john do you allow BNC and Eggdrops? If so how much for extra IPs? Any coupon for 512mb server?

  Sorry, we do not allow IRC. Extra IP's are $2. The LET25 coupon code can be applied to the 512MB plan for 25% off. I can take a little more than that off, PM me.
• William Member

  August 2012

  @john said: New York City Area, the exact address is 101 Possumtown Rd, Piscataway, NJ.

  That is not NY... that is NJ.
  Misleading...
• flam316 Member

  August 2012

  That is not NY... that is NJ.
  Misleading...

  It basically is NY. It's so close that it doesn't even matter.
• Nick_A Member, Top Host, Host Rep

  August 2012 edited August 2012

  Hmm guess it's time to change up my offer language

  Eerily similar.
• john Member

  August 2012 edited August 2012

  @William said: That is not NY... that is NJ.

  Misleading...

  Pisscataway is 40 miles away from the center of New York City. I understand where you're coming from and will edit the offer and our website to better reflect this.

  @Nick_A said: Hmm guess it's time to change up my offer language

  Eerily similar.

  What part do you find similar? The only similar part I found was "never sacrificing quality or performance". I have been to your website/seen your offers before so it's likely I subconsciously copied the phrase. I apologize and will edit the offer.

  Edit: It seems I'm past the time frame you can edit. I will make these corrections in future posts.
• serverbear Member

  August 2012 edited August 2012

  @john just ran a benchmark for this plan.

  UnixBench

  Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 12 2012 02:38:52 - 03:08:41
  1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
  
  Dhrystone 2 using register variables       14047764.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
  Double-Precision Whetstone                     3140.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
  Execl Throughput                               3944.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
  File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        611248.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
  File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          162307.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
  File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1624768.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
  Pipe Throughput                              917061.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
  Pipe-based Context Switching                 255752.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
  Process Creation                              14234.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
  Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4476.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
  Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    625.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
  System Call Overhead                         876091.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
  
  System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
  Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   14047764.8   1203.8
  Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3140.2    570.9
  Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3944.8    917.4
  File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     611248.8   1543.6
  File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     162307.5    980.7
  File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1624768.8   2801.3
  Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     917061.5    737.2
  Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     255752.1    639.4
  Process Creation                                126.0      14234.4   1129.7
  Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4476.0   1055.7
  Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        625.4   1042.3
  System Call Overhead                          15000.0     876091.9    584.1
                                                                     ========
  System Benchmarks Index Score                                         992.6

  IOPS

  ioping -c 10
  request=1 time=0.0 ms
  request=2 time=0.1 ms
  request=3 time=0.1 ms
  request=4 time=0.2 ms
  request=5 time=0.1 ms
  request=6 time=0.1 ms
  request=7 time=0.2 ms
  request=8 time=0.3 ms
  request=9 time=3.2 ms
  request=10 time=0.4 ms
  
  10 requests completed in 9005.8 ms, 2099 iops, 8.2 mb/s
  
  ioping -RD
  6238 iops, 24.4 mb/s
  min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.2/15.5/0.4 ms

  dd

  dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
  2.08836 s, 514 MB/s
  
  dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
  1.82265 s, 589 MB/s
  

  Network

  Cachefly    40.8 MB/s
  Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA     14.7 MB/s
  Linode, Dallas, TX, USA  11.8 MB/s
  Linode, Tokyo, JP    3.12 MB/s
  Linode, London, UK   6.15 MB/s
  OVH, Paris, France   7.52 MB/s
  SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands  7.64 MB/s
  Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany  6.82 MB/s
  iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia  1.70 MB/s
  Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA   6.82 MB/s
  Softlayer, Singapore     2.09 MB/s
  Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA  4.50 MB/s
  Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA     6.89 MB/s
  Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA   59.5 MB/s
  

  Trace

  Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
   1  kvmny01.ssdvirt.com (108.61.35.73)  0.608 ms  0.976 ms  1.395 ms
   2  ethernet17-7-br1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.92.113)  4.147 ms  4.138 ms  4.123 ms
   3  ae7.ar2.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.77)  5.298 ms  5.288 ms  5.276 ms
   4  vlan-76.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.131)  5.821 ms  5.256 ms  5.754 ms
   5  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  1.591 ms  1.583 ms  1.937 ms

  Pretty damn impressive IO & Network imo, I just picked up one myself.

  Link to full benchmark: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/12/jNoqCyYWzFzEh7Ro
• john Member

  August 2012

  The benchmark @serverbear posted was when I accidentally ran his script twice at the same time. Here are the "true" results: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/12/TjvnpPGESa3sOUHm