Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


EDIS reliability issues - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

EDIS reliability issues

13»

Comments

  • should probably checkout this one here

    @ExPl0ReR TOS for that one?

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @ExPl0ReR said: waveride.at

    Haha, @AnthonySmith

  • @DomainBop said: @ExPl0ReR TOS for that one?

    Same as with EDIS, just openVZ

    What exactly would you need to know?

  • why not? ;-)

  • ChanChan Member
    edited April 2013

    @ExPl0ReR said: Same as with EDIS, just openVZ

    What exactly would you need to know?

    Is it hosted and supported by the same people at EDIS? Same facility?

    If so are you guys looking into expanding service into datacenters overseas? (like Edis)

  • emilvemilv Member

    Is waveride.at owned by EDIS?

  • @Chan said: Is it hosted and supported by the same people at EDIS? Same facility?

    YES.

  • @emilv said: Is waveride.at owned by EDIS?

    YEPP.

  • @Chan said: If so are you guys looking into expanding service into datacenters overseas? (like Edis)

    The main concerns are enormous colocation and bandwidth costs in Asia (if you refer to ASIA). If you refer to United States, this might be considered in the near future.

    Gerhard

  • @ExPl0ReR said: waveride.at

    Hole shit, that are some nice prices <3

    Can you say something about the reliability of these servers regarding DDoS and likewise?

  • Anybody interested in a test-drive? We give away 3 plans
    COUPON: SAMPLE-AT-MEGA-4GB
    gives you the 50 GB HDD / 4 GB RAM plan free of charge for the first month.
    Check it out at waveride.at

    Gerhard

  • ShigawireShigawire Member
    edited April 2013

    Got one :P will review this and post a serverbear, if this is okay for you?

    Edit:

    Wohhaaaa...

    root@server1:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.16679 s, 496 MB/s
  • @gsrdgrdghd said: Can you say something about the reliability of these servers regarding DDoS and likewise?

    As there is no KVM bridge in place it might be better than KVM, but doesn't mean anything. It always depends on the nature of the attack.

    Machines are in Vienna and in a couple of days we will have multiple 10 GBit/s upstreams in place. DDoS should not be a huge hassle any more ...

  • First test-machine is already gone ... hurry up, only 2 left!

  • @ExPl0ReR Just taken one! This should be interesting, expect benchmarks soon

  • second gone, congrats Richard!

  • and the 3rd one is gone to Thom in SE ;-)

  • But.. why? Is this a thing now?

  • @ExPl0ReR

    root@aus:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test > /dev/null
    --2013-04-19 16:57:38--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `100mb.test'
    
    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 1.45M/s   in 70s
    
    2013-04-19 16:58:48 (1.43 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
    

    Hmm network disappointing right now; or is it just others spamming benchmarks too?

  • @jkr1711:
    had similar results when using cachefly.
    Using a german mirror, however gives me this:

    wget http://speedtest.qsc.de/100MB.qsc
    --2013-04-19 23:00:48--  http://speedtest.qsc.de/100MB.qsc
    Resolving speedtest.qsc.de (speedtest.qsc.de)... 195.90.7.115
    Connecting to speedtest.qsc.de (speedtest.qsc.de)|195.90.7.115|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [text/plain]
    Saving to: `100MB.qsc'
    
    100%[================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 19.2M/s   in 5.5s
    
    2013-04-19 23:00:54 (18.0 MB/s) - `100MB.qsc' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
  • @jkr1711 said: Hmm network disappointing right now; or is it just others spamming benchmarks too?

    no clue why cachefly does not like us.

    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 * * *
    2 xe020-358.RT.IRX.VIE.AT.retn.net (87.245.246.217) 0.453 ms 0.467 ms 0.465 ms
    3 ae2-10.RT.TC2.LON.UK.retn.net (87.245.233.238) 82.769 ms 28.016 ms 82.766 ms
    4 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 28.338 ms 28.819 ms 28.614 ms

    from our infrastructure in UK we were able to download much faster:

    wget http://uk.edis.at/100MB.test
    --2013-04-19 23:05:14-- http://uk.edis.at/100MB.test

    100% ] 100.000.000 4,84M/s in 18s

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited April 2013

    @ExPl0ReR said: why not? ;-)

    Well, I am taunting Anthony, his crusade against OVZ is well known :)
    I cant wait his comments about the s**t providers destroying themselves with a race to the bottom, nothing against your offer, looks pretty cool :)
    Edit: and looking towards Chris too, his comments about "losing" are always eagerly awaited :P

  • Apart from trying to milk out some more cash from aged hardware, i don't really understand why anyone would actually want to do something like this. The lowend-market is effectively shooting itself in the foot with offers similar to mid 00's "unlimited webhosting"-plans.

  • blergh_ said "Apart from trying to milk out some more cash from aged hardware"

    Waverider E5-2630 = not aged hardware
    Overzold E5-2620 =ditto

  • @Maounique said: I cant wait his comments about the s**t providers destroying themselves with a race to the bottom ...

    We're using pretty cool hardware for this project. If openVZ only nearly scales as vserver containers, with a couple of additional features and reduced overhead compared to KVM, the calculation should be quite ok.

    @blergh_ said: milk out some more cash from aged hardware

    You can definitely NOT do something like this with aged hardware. For such a project you need high-density, highly capable, ultra-efficient machinery.

  • emilvemilv Member

    Do you offer rDNS for IPv6 at waveride?

  • @emilv said: Do you offer rDNS for IPv6 at waveride?

    nope. will be launching rDNS for IP6 later this year (both EDIS and Waveride)

  • @ExPl0ReR
    Right..

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @ExPl0ReR said: You can definitely NOT do something like this with aged hardware. For such a project you need high-density, highly capable, ultra-efficient machinery.

    Indeed. It scales best when there is a large pool of resources which can have a few hogs and not fall flat on the back. On an old node one hog and it's in a coma.

Sign In or Register to comment.