New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
disk i/o seems a bit on the low side for a SSD ..
Putty closed connection on Testing Vienna ...
Very bad
Intel atom, with sata2 probably
So i need to report it ?
Just be aware that reporting it (to ask for a replacement) may also get you an immediate refund. In other words, OnlineNet also knows how to "wable" customers for certain things.
Datasheet shows atom is capably of sata3 http://ark.intel.com/products/77987/
So maybe ask, its a custom system I think.
There is something more to it than just being in a SATAII port. My XC servers with them all have SATA drivers and the performance is below 50MB/s...so not just a port issue.
There's nothing wrong with your SSD write speed, it's likely on SATA2 - you would want to be looking at read, iops, and smartmontools.
Thank you all, so you will suggest me, to get replacement of hdd?
There is already a very detailed thread dedicated to XC 2016... the disk I/O is OK as per many benchmarks. It is locked at Sata II speeds, I also have the same 155-165mbps I/O speed on my own XC 2016
Use hdparm instead of this stupid benchmark. Dedibox XC 2016 is stucked on SATA2 and you can't do anything with it.
Which one is best Benchmark Script to get info of my server?
hdparm -t /dev/sda
This is my 'Dedibox Limited 33816 (XC with 1 TB HDD)' testing:
Which one for full test both hdd and network?