Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Your experiences with ChicagoVPS, please! - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Your experiences with ChicagoVPS, please!

2»

Comments

  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @TheOnlyDK said:
    @VSNX_Nick I PMed you, but no replies from you.

    Will get back to you after the weekend.

    Thanked by 1TheOnlyDK
  • emgemg Veteran
    edited August 2016

    @Lee said:

    emg said: I would not be willing to concede that they have suddenly turned it around for the long haul in just a few months.

    You are in the LET minority though. It's the price that matters for the majority.

    True, especially because the majority does not do its homework before signing up, or maybe the knowledgeable ones have a gambling problem. :-)

    emg said: I predict

    So did Nostradamus.

    Okay. Perhaps I should have said, "I would not be surprised to see..." or "I bet that..." Let's wait a year to see whether any disasters befall ChicagoVPS in the future. For its customers' sake, I hope not.

  • @VSNX_Nick said:

    @TheOnlyDK said:
    @VSNX_Nick I PMed you, but no replies from you.

    Will get back to you after the weekend.

    Monday's almost over.

  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @TheOnlyDK said:

    @VSNX_Nick said:

    @TheOnlyDK said:
    @VSNX_Nick I PMed you, but no replies from you.

    Will get back to you after the weekend.

    Monday's almost over.

    Not for me :(

  • @VSNX_Nick said:

    @TheOnlyDK said:

    @VSNX_Nick said:

    @TheOnlyDK said:
    @VSNX_Nick I PMed you, but no replies from you.

    Will get back to you after the weekend.

    Monday's almost over.

    Not for me :(

    I'm sorry to hear that :( but I do hope that I can get my awesome vps :)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Nick is the man, I am sure he'll take care of you.

    Thanked by 1TheOnlyDK
  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    I think what we can take from this is that things have definitely got better since Chris was removed and Nick is doing a much better job.

    Honestly though the smart business move at this point imo is to rebrand or swallow it in to the less tarnished by the past brand of HVH, let CVPS die, it does no one any favours when trying to build trust or reputation, the Internet does not forget.

    Thanked by 2AlyssaD netomx
  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @ATHK said:

    @VSNX_Nick said:

    @TheOnlyDK said:
    Damn that's cheap. Want one too :p

    Shoot me a PM and we can get you the same setup as a courtesy :)

    Any chance I could get in on this? Crissic is closing my account and the end of the year and I'd like something cheap with 50GB disk..

    [EDIT] it's only a backup server so disk and BW are more important than anything else :)

    Shoot me a PM boss.

    Thanked by 1ATHK
  • So I was a customer for 3 years till Aug 2016. Had to leave because:
    a. No Centos7 template... I requested support (May 2016), they said, no its causing issues with the host os, cannot create one.
    b. Several times, the vps would be down (without explanation) and all it was doing is idling. Support would respond back, "Vps is working fine"
    c. above.

  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @dwnewyork5 said:
    So I was a customer for 3 years till Aug 2016. Had to leave because:
    a. No Centos7 template... I requested support (May 2016), they said, no its causing issues with the host os, cannot create one.
    b. Several times, the vps would be down (without explanation) and all it was doing is idling. Support would respond back, "Vps is working fine"
    c. above.

    Apologies to hear that, please let us know if you want to consider trying another service with us, I will give you the first month free to see if it is something you would like to continue with.

  • All I can say is Nick is awesome!

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • @VSNX_Nick said:

    @dwnewyork5 said:
    So I was a customer for 3 years till Aug 2016. Had to leave because:
    a. No Centos7 template... I requested support (May 2016), they said, no its causing issues with the host os, cannot create one.
    b. Several times, the vps would be down (without explanation) and all it was doing is idling. Support would respond back, "Vps is working fine"
    c. above.

    Apologies to hear that, please let us know if you want to consider trying another service with us, I will give you the first month free to see if it is something you would like to continue with.

    Thanks for the offer. No requirements currently. If something comes up, will check out.

  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @dwnewyork5 said:

    @VSNX_Nick said:

    @dwnewyork5 said:
    So I was a customer for 3 years till Aug 2016. Had to leave because:
    a. No Centos7 template... I requested support (May 2016), they said, no its causing issues with the host os, cannot create one.
    b. Several times, the vps would be down (without explanation) and all it was doing is idling. Support would respond back, "Vps is working fine"
    c. above.

    Apologies to hear that, please let us know if you want to consider trying another service with us, I will give you the first month free to see if it is something you would like to continue with.

    Thanks for the offer. No requirements currently. If something comes up, will check out.

    Sounds good and most welcome!

  • @TheOnlyDK said:
    All I can say is Nick is awesome!

    I have to agree ^^

    I secretly sneaked on that kvm-for-ten-bucks-train to NJ and first impression seems good.

    I've been a customer with cvps before, but got rid of it a year ago after the last vps wasn't kept at a recurring price unlike told before. yet never really had remarkable issues with that old box, so wanted to give them another try (and another veerrry cheap box for me haha :-))

    the billing/control panel is a bit messy, esp. the choice of templates/iso seems some kind of wildly thrown together. no debian 8 oob though.

    after a lot of dist-upgrade only had time for a real quick benchmark, might do more including K4Y5 and geekbench later and will do a follow up after having it used for a while ;-)

    System Info
    -----------
    Processor       : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    CPU Cores       : 4
    Frequency       : 1999.999 MHz
    Memory          : 1000 MB
    Swap            : 1023 MB
    Uptime          : 34 min,
    OS              : Debian GNU/Linux 8
    Arch            : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel          : 3.16.0-4-amd64
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Location                Provider        Speed
    CDN                     Cachefly        83.3MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          39.2MB/s
    Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       5.50MB/s
    Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       20.9MB/s
    San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       16.9MB/s
    Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       21.9MB/s
    
    Tokyo, Japan            Linode          10.6MB/s
    Singapore               Softlayer       5.05MB/s
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         7.15MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        42.4MB/s
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 30.6 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 35.0 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 35.6 MB/s
    Average I/O     : 33.7333 MB/s
    

    system does respond quickly, slow dd io does not seem to hurt. as I will use this box most likely as a private vpn only, I don't care much either way ;-)

    Thanked by 2TheOnlyDK FrankZ
  • I have an "Enterprise VPS" in NJ since a couple of months now, and I can say it's pretty stable as for now. Sure, the numbers bellow are not fabulous, but are constant none the less.

    [root@nj ~]# wget zqc.ca/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency :  3400.024 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 2048 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime :   150 days, 15 min,       
    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.7MB/s 
    Download speed from OVH, Montreal, Canada: 10.7MB/s 
    Download speed from Atlantic.NET, Toronto, Canada: 10.1MB/s 
    Download speed from Choopa, Piscataway, USA: 10.4MB/s 
    Download speed from Dacentec, Lenoir, USA: 11.2MB/s 
    Download speed from Atlantic.NET, Orlando, USA: 11.5MB/s 
    Download speed from Atlantic.NET, Dallas, USA: 9.31MB/s 
    Download speed from Atlantic.NET, San Francisco, USA: 8.45MB/s 
    Download speed from QuadraNET, LA, USA: 4.21MB/s 
    Download speed from OVH, Roubaix, FR: 6.67MB/s 
    Download speed from Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 7.74MB/s 
    Download speed from Redstation, London, UK: 9.26MB/s 
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.64MB/s 
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem: 10.3MB/s 
    10 Gbps Download speed from Atlanta, Ga: 11.8MB/s 
    I/O speed :  69.9 MB/s
    

    Geekbench : http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8011088

    I only pay $3.40 /mo using the recurring easter60 coupon code, so it's a no brainer for me.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @falzo thanks for your business. We are actively refreshing the templates currently. You'll see that soon.

    @fredqc glad you are having a positive experience. Consider trying some instances at our other locations too!

  • @jbiloh said:
    @fredqc glad you are having a positive experience. Consider trying some instances at our other locations too!

    Have any plans to expand CVPS to Seattle?

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @TheOnlyDK said:

    @jbiloh said:
    @fredqc glad you are having a positive experience. Consider trying some instances at our other locations too!

    Have any plans to expand CVPS to Seattle?

    Not right now. Sorry :(

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    We wabt plans of $4/y

  • @VSNX_Nick Do you have a plan to improve the IO performance? it's indeed slow and below other providers.

  • NickNick Member, Patron Provider

    @zongyouxiao said:
    @VSNX_Nick Do you have a plan to improve the IO performance? it's indeed slow and below other providers.

    If you are having a specific issue, please pop in a ticket and we will see what we can do for you and make sure you are provisioned on a new node.

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    joereid said: Can't argue with 4 cores/1GB/KVM for $10/yr

    link?

    Thanked by 2K4Y5 FrankZ
  • K4Y5K4Y5 Member
    edited August 2016

    Snagged one of those $4/Yr plans a few months back that I occasionally use for temporarily hosting services during testing, migration etc.

    Though the VPS has been idling for the better part, and I did have an issue where one of the support guys switched my IPv4 address with a blacklisted one without even informing me (which I eventually got back after exchanging a bunch of messages), it seems to be performing alright for something I had really low expectations to begin with.

    Thanked by 1netomx
  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited August 2016

    jbiloh said: @falzo thanks for your business. We are actively refreshing the templates currently. You'll see that soon.

    yeah, that would be nice. It seems in SolusVM there is only Centos and via rebuild in billing panel there are more likely not the newest distros (but more fur sure).

    yet there is a much preferable mount option available, which would work nicely with KVM and VNC console but there are lot of... unknown/custom isos to mount which doesn't look very reliable ;-)

    no offense meant, as long as I can install any debian (which worked for sure as wheezy min is available) one can upgrade via apt...

    I did a geekbench this morning for those who are interested http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/8012437

    AES performance could be much better if the CPU flag would have been passed through, yet there is nothing to complain about performance for a 4 core KVM box at $10/y price tag. never seen another offer like that.

    out of curiosity also did a real world timing on copy ~20k files:

    # du -sBM /usr
    489M    /usr
    
    # find /usr -type f |wc -l
    19365
    
    # time cp -rp /usr usr2
    
    real    2m26.128s
    user    0m0.904s
    sys     0m7.936s
    

    not the fastet for sure, but keep in mind, that this was an exceptional special offer and most probably a simple space filler on that node.

    so far the vps doesn't feel slow or lagging and I am very happy with it. will check more network speeds and setup softether later to see what else could be said about.

    EDIT: some more network speeds, not much to complain about ;-)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         81.0MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP                108.61.201.151          6.39MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          8.94MB/s
    DO, Bangalore, IN               139.59.0.49             3.23MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN          169.38.65.84            3.59MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG               128.199.90.252          7.97MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            3.60MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           4.87MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG         103.254.153.18          8.29MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          6.01MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN          43.249.36.49            5.08MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS              108.61.212.117          4.54MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS          168.1.1.212             2.60MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS       168.1.65.244            4.75MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT            159.122.128.84          6.92MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT            37.247.53.10            629KB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU       94.242.192.2            24.0MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE            108.61.210.117          11.2MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           6.04MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            8.55MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE         37.58.58.140            9.35MB/s
    DO, Frankfurt, DE               46.101.236.127          9.64MB/s
    Vultr, Paris, FR                108.61.209.127          10.2MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR             5.196.90.200            4.34MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR             5.135.128.81            2.10MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR                188.165.12.106          6.44MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR           62.210.18.40            14.1MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL            108.61.198.102          9.68MB/s
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL             178.62.180.186          27.1MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL             188.166.111.128         27.9MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL         5.79.108.33             13.9MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL              213.163.76.200          6.77MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK               108.61.196.101          11.3MB/s
    DO, London, UK          46.101.25.75            30.9MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           7.17MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK           5.10.97.132             18.4MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX           169.57.4.116            12.1MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR           169.57.128.148          9.17MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA          162.243.175.118         72.6MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA          104.131.206.249         86.4MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA          45.55.79.255            74.8MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA          108.61.149.182          39.2MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA             50.116.57.237           72.2MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA            107.191.51.12           27.2MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA             108.61.193.166          27.4MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA            50.116.39.117           38.6MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA               104.156.244.232         18.7MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA          108.61.194.105          2.65MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA         67.228.112.250          20.6MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA       108.59.10.97            29.8MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA              108.61.224.175          19.3MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA             50.116.25.154           14.4MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA          173.192.68.18           30.3MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA           209.58.153.1            16.9MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA         108.61.219.200          14.7MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          138.68.0.41             8.14MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          104.236.186.68          31.6MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA            50.116.14.9             8.58MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187          1.52MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA         159.203.0.174           16.6MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA            192.99.19.165           18.5MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA            24.222.0.194            15.8MB/s
    Tele2, Canada, CA               90.130.70.73            5.27MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA         169.54.124.180          27.6MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
Sign In or Register to comment.