Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Any kvm/dedi provider that has 1ms ping to Binary[dot]com?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Any kvm/dedi provider that has 1ms ping to Binary[dot]com?

As title said, I need vps that has low latency to binary[dot]com. First vps running a week to check stability, next purchase 20 - 50 vps. Dedicated machine also welcome.

Budget $7 with 1 or 2gb ram.

Comments

  • rds100rds100 Member
    edited August 2016

    It's cloudflared?

    So are you looking for someone within 1ms from a cloudflare pop?

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited August 2016

    They use CloudFlare, so lots of providers will have low latency to the site, e.g. from Online.net:

     Host                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
     1. 195-154-xxxxx.rev.poneytelecom.eu    0.0%    11    0.6   0.6   0.6   0.7   0.0
     2. a9k1-49e-s46-1.dc3.poneytelecom.eu   0.0%    11    2.0   1.0   0.6   2.0   0.3
     3. 195.154.1.193                        0.0%    11    1.1   1.1   1.1   1.2   0.0
     4. equinix-paris.cloudflare.com         0.0%    10    1.2   1.2   1.1   1.7   0.0
     5. 104.16.64.111                        0.0%    10    1.0   1.2   0.9   1.5   0.0
    

    However that doesn't tell you the latency to their actual web server. So what if my server has 1ms to the European CF cache, if their actual server is overseas, users from the US will have lower latency submitting their actions (in this case performing trades) than anyone from Europe. But most likely you have no way of knowing where it is, and they won't tell you.

    Thanked by 1nadz
  • Mostly every provider will have 1ms to CloudFlare PoPs.

  • AlyssaDAlyssaD Member
    edited August 2016
    root@web:~# mtr binary.com --report
    Start: Tue Aug  9 08:50:58 2016
    HOST: web                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 2604:880:27::1             0.0%    10    1.2   1.3   1.1   1.6   0.0
      2.|-- 2604:880:12::55            0.0%    10    2.7   4.7   0.6  10.7   3.5
      3.|-- 2604:880:10::1             0.0%    10    0.6   3.9   0.6  33.1  10.3
      4.|-- xe-0-0-3.edge01.dfw01.as1  0.0%    10    0.6   0.7   0.6   1.0   0.0
      5.|-- 2400:cb00:2048:1::6810:3f  0.0%    10    0.6   0.7   0.6   0.8   0.0
    
    root@web:~# mtr binary.com --report -4
    Start: Tue Aug  9 08:51:41 2016
    HOST: web                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 23.227.182.193             0.0%    10    1.2   1.1   1.0   1.2   0.0
      2.|-- 144.168.34.85              0.0%    10   12.7  18.3  12.7  34.4   6.4
      3.|-- 144.168.32.1               0.0%    10    0.6   0.6   0.5   0.7   0.0
      4.|-- xe-0-0-3.edge01.dfw01.as1  0.0%    10    0.7   0.8   0.5   2.0   0.0
      5.|-- 104.16.65.111              0.0%    10    0.7   0.7   0.6   0.8   0.0
    
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @nadz said:
    As title said, I need vps that has low latency to binary[dot]com. First vps running a week to check stability, next purchase 20 - 50 vps. Dedicated machine also welcome.

    Budget $7 with 1 or 2gb ram.

    There you go: https://www.hetnix.com/vps-servers.xml

    PING binary.com (104.16.62.111) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 104.16.62.111: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.303 ms
    64 bytes from 104.16.62.111: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=0.282 ms
    64 bytes from 104.16.62.111: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=0.321 ms
    64 bytes from 104.16.62.111: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=0.277 ms
    
  • ktkt Member, Host Rep

    If this is for forex, I doubt any of the options posted here will work until you know the actual IP used by binary.com that you would be connecting to or whatever.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Their back end IP is 207.210.194.152. They probably block non cloudflare traffic though.

    Thanked by 2nadz doghouch
  • Requested.

This discussion has been closed.