Help me decide between these two VPS

Chalipa

i have one KVM with HVH

8GB RAM
150GB SSD
2 Core
5 IPs
cPanel

for $26

and OpenVZ with HostUs

6GB Ram + 6 GB Swap
150GB HDD
4 Core
2 IP

for $18/qtr

and extra $13 for cpanel

the reason why i went to HVH is the vps was down for a couple of days with HostUs when they had problem, now they say it's much more stable an they are with new network and better ddos protection.

which one of these do you think i should continue to have?

Chalipa

HostUS - OpenVZ

[root@core ~]# wget http://freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
Benchmark started on Thu May 19 08:59:40 EDT 2016
Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log

System Info

Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v5 @ 3.60GHz
CPU Cores : 4
Frequency : 3600.036 MHz
Memory : 6144 MB
Swap : 6144 MB
Uptime : 1 min,

OS : CentOS release 6.7 (Final)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab113.21
Hostname : --

Speedtest (IPv4 only)

Your public IPv4 is **

Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 44.8MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 2.25MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 4.21MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 3.02MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.05MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 1.79MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.34MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 2.07MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 18.0MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 23.4MB/s

Disk Speed

I/O (1st run) : 666 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 1.3 GB/s
Average I/O : 222.833 MB/s

[root@core ~]#

HVH KVM

root@core [~]# wget http://freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
Benchmark started on Thu May 19 14:58:50 CEST 2016
Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log

System Info

Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores : 2
Frequency : 3392.160 MHz
Memory : 7870 MB
Swap : 4095 MB
Uptime : 14 days, 21:10,

OS : This computer system is for authorized users only. Individuals using this
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.x86_64
Hostname : --

Speedtest (IPv4 only)

Your public IPv4 is **

Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 26.0MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 4.20MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 6.58MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 3.80MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.80MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 524KB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 6.50MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 1.93MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 3.62MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 9.00MB/s

Disk Speed

I/O (1st run) : 197 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 45.3 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 28.1 MB/s
Average I/O : 90.1333 MB/s

root@core [~]#

tommy

Ask you self!

BradyH

@Chalipa

What you posted there should give you a great Idea of which one you should stay with.

budi1413

Leave them both.

Damian

What's your use case? Does it need KVM? If not, go with the HostUs VM.