Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


online.net why like locked server? any problems to do locked and need reinstall OS
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

online.net why like locked server? any problems to do locked and need reinstall OS

notgodnotgod Member
edited May 2016 in General

online.net why like locked server? any problems do it.

my encounter
i used it one years, but has been locked 2 times

1

first times because has child pornography, servers run upload site, file sharing
so we can't user upload content, but we have abuse team, <4 hours fix deleted
wait 1 day for ticket to open servers
if severs locked, only repair mode boot and you must reinstall the OS system
so we move 12TB data to backup servers, reinstall OS and move back
waste a week times.
this old website has closed !!! don't talk about it again

2

the second time, say flood to locked
even more interesting this times , i am not get any notice in my email
and this servers just storage files, install directadmin, sure not any security problem.
the website used cloudflare front end

so, five days later find this problem, login to online.net , see servers locked(flood)
this times can unlock, but need to pay 19euro fee, it's call reactivation fees
ok, paid, now servers online in repair mode,
must reinstall OS, to do repeat , move data , reinstall OS and move back

very very very very interesting or not?
it's against humanity design?
if with Online self servers run online.net web site
have small problem close online.net web servers
what feel about it?

this company cheap,automation is not bad.
but i think webmaster need servers requires stability.

you encountered this kind of problem?

«1

Comments

  • tommytommy Member

    Do you asked support before? why your server in repair mode?

  • notgodnotgod Member

    @tommy said:
    Do you asked support before? why your server in repair mode?

    sorry, you can try it, maybe this is their standard procedure.

    this locked and unlock to see

    if you want Boot in normal mode

    say error ( must reinstall OS)

  • Use front-end and back-end server.

    You will not waste time to move big data ;)

  • notgodnotgod Member

    @hawkjohn7 said:
    Use front-end and back-end server.

    You will not waste time to move big data ;)

    yep, we are slave storage node have big data, master site use cloudflare

    the slave severs must keep online and have large traffic use.

    if add front end servers for slave node, traffic generated double, not good for us.

  • tommytommy Member

    So you dont ask support :)

    Good luck

  • notgodnotgod Member

    @tommy said:
    So you dont ask support :)

    Good luck

    first time asking, get reply say must reinstall OS to keep OS safe, babababa....

  • tommytommy Member

    they're not the best support in the world, you must patience and explain what do you want clearly.

    Thanked by 1exception0x876
  • notgodnotgod Member

    @tommy said:
    they're not the best support in the world, you must patience and explain what do you want clearly.

    anywhere, i have canceled all servers with this company.

    I just said that the company's products are not suitable use for website.

    after all, any problems just to locking server, all web site down. no one can endure it.

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    My suggestion, get a bunch of the cheaper servers to handle front end, use rpn to link them to the storage nodes. This way, only the front end boxes will be disabled and you can attach a new front end box in minuets to the back end while you sort out the blocked devices.

    As your allowing users to upload stuff, your always at risk of abuse so you best just plan to cope with this sort of thing. PM me if you want to discuss more or need a hand.

    Im running ST12 for backend, and mWOPR for front end media server.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • notgodnotgod Member

    @pbgben said:
    My suggestion, get a bunch of the cheaper servers to handle front end, use rpn to link them to the storage nodes. This way, only the front end boxes will be disabled and you can attach a new front end box in minuets to the back end while you sort out the blocked devices.

    As your allowing users to upload stuff, your always at risk of abuse so you best just plan to cope with this sort of thing. PM me if you want to discuss more or need a hand.

    Im running ST12 for backend, and mWOPR for front end media server.

    thanks

    no plan to used this company products

    this not about abuse for second times.

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    Fair enough, perhaps OVH? or another provider that does internal / Private networking

    OVH's IP Load balancer is a good tool too.

    Whoever you go with, your still going to get abuse reports and will need to keep the site running by duplicating resources one way or another, IMO

    Perhaps @cociu can help, I hear they are better with abuse notices.

  • DrJinglesMDDrJinglesMD Member
    edited May 2016

    If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn then you deserve every suspension they give. I'm surprised they gave you more than one chance. I'd kick you off my network at the first sign of Child Porn or illicit activities. The amount of legal liability you opened up their company to is enormous.

    Cut your losses and move on. Maybe you should get out of the image hosting business. It's obviously not for you.

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    @DrJinglesMD said:
    If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn then you deserve every suspension they give. I'm surprised they gave you more than one chance. I'd kick you off my network at the first sign of Child Porn or illicit activities. The amount of legal liability you opened up their company to is enormous.

    Cut your losses and move on. Maybe you should get out of the image hosting business. It's obviously not for you.

    Hey, dbad. They said they removed the content when they were made aware of it, same as other image boards. If you have no constructive feedback for this thread or any other thread then please don't post.

    Thanked by 1Nyr
  • cociucociu Member

    pbgben said: Perhaps @cociu can help, I hear they are better with abuse notices.

    DrJinglesMD said: If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn

    i am totaly close , first i hate any child porn , and second is illegal

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member

    @DrJinglesMD said:
    If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn then you deserve every suspension they give. I'm surprised they gave you more than one chance. I'd kick you off my network at the first sign of Child Porn or illicit activities. The amount of legal liability you opened up their company to is enormous.

    Cut your losses and move on. Maybe you should get out of the image hosting business. It's obviously not for you.

    If you run an upload site you will always have people that upload bad stuff. I wouldn't want to host with you then if you immediately suspend for such an incident.

    I remember when a user on my site uploaded a child porn image as his avatar and then directly went on to report it to CloudFlare who reported it to me and prometeus, trying to take the site down this way.

    I'm happy prometeus didn't directly suspend me and also had some sense, because they saw that it was user-uploaded content.

    With something like this, always have a mail where people can report abuse and where you can react in a reasonable timeframe.

    Thanked by 1Nyr
  • tr1ckytr1cky Member
    edited May 2016

    @cociu said:

    pbgben said: Perhaps @cociu can help, I hear they are better with abuse notices.

    DrJinglesMD said: If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn

    i am totaly close , first i hate any child porn , and second is illegal

    You would directly suspend for child porn? Without notifying the person who hosts the server before?

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • cociucociu Member

    tr1cky said: You would directly suspend for child porn? Without notifying the person who hosts the server before?

    if i got notice about child porn definetly i will suspend until the client is online to remove the content. If the client is not connect 1 week ?

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member

    @cociu said:

    tr1cky said: You would directly suspend for child porn? Without notifying the person who hosts the server before?

    if i got notice about child porn definetly i will suspend until the client is online to remove the content. If the client is not connect 1 week ?

    Funny where you draw lines...

    Even if said client hosts a pic-upload site where everyone can upload what they want? You would suspend without prior notice in such a case?

  • cociucociu Member
    edited May 2016

    tr1cky said: Funny where you draw lines...

    Even if said client hosts a pic-upload site where everyone can upload what they want? You would suspend without prior notice in such a case?

    if you put something online you need to controle this . Is easy to blame the host no ? At least i am verry opened in anything but where i am strictly i am strictly ! The problem is here : most of you dont know how this function , and wrost ! in any country have different law for this. So i act how i am obligated. Have many hosters there who terminate directly , at least in my case all data remain until the client is remove the content , or if prefere to go to another hoster until the data is transfered. But definetly the content claimed will not be online in this time.

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member
    edited May 2016

    @cociu said:

    tr1cky said: Funny where you draw lines...

    Even if said client hosts a pic-upload site where everyone can upload what they want? You would suspend without prior notice in such a case?

    if you put something online you need to controle this . Is easy to blame the host no ? At least i am verry opened in anything but where i am strictly i am strictly !

    You mean, if someone else puts something online on your site.

    At least give the user a timeframe (12-24 hours) to remove the content if it's not clearly a child-porn site that the users hosts.

  • cociucociu Member

    tr1cky said: At least give the user a timeframe (12-24 hours) to remove the content if it's not clearly a child-porn site that the users hosts.

    Sorry for tel you but in this case you have no ideea .. at least about my obligations, and dont forgott i sell DMCA and Copiright free and YES I am the person who in this case definetly the user have suspend until is online.

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    Its kind of difficult to remove content you don't have access to. I could understand suspension after a set time, the owner of the site doesn't want the content as much as you so wants it removed. What if your upstream provider did the same for you? Think about the other users that it effects, no?

    You should be given a time to remove the content, and for that to happen you need notification.

    Thanked by 2tr1cky vimalware
  • notgodnotgod Member

    thanks all user talk about it.

    the first locked servers say child porn problem!
    i have check rar files, it have rar password, i download and can't open.
    so we can't check it

    if use google search has much link in file sharing sites
    https://www.google.com/search?q=nvideo_03.rar

    second time, say flood reason to locked servers
    really is a joke, i am not get any notice and not any log can prove a problem
    maybe just need 19 euros reactivation fees. the servers paid 19euro fee and open over 48 hours, not change anything just backup. and no different from previous, why not locked again?

    so this really bad feel about it company.

  • notgodnotgod Member
    edited May 2016

    i have find last ticket
    Attention the To unlock server, you have to backup and reinstall it and take care of this.

    this user has upload much website.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=users/ach7092/
    all have password, so can't check.

  • notgodnotgod Member

    @DrJinglesMD said:
    If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn then you deserve every suspension they give. I'm surprised they gave you more than one chance. I'd kick you off my network at the first sign of Child Porn or illicit activities. The amount of legal liability you opened up their company to is enormous.

    Cut your losses and move on. Maybe you should get out of the image hosting business. It's obviously not for you.

    thanks talk about it,
    no much abuse, i have check it
    from 2014-03-28 22:07:22 to today, we just one times Abuse.

  • dailydaily Member

    Please fix your signature, it's currently breaking rules.

    Maximum of two lines, with three links total.

  • notgodnotgod Member

    @cociu said:

    pbgben said: Perhaps @cociu can help, I hear they are better with abuse notices.

    DrJinglesMD said: If you're running a site where users MAY upload Child Porn

    i am totaly close , first i hate any child porn , and second is illegal

    similarly, we also hate
    but we can not avoid the occasional user of this

    we just need time to remove, don't just close port
    i am 2014-03-28 22:07:22 - today just one abuse to this problem
    this really not very much

  • notgodnotgod Member
    edited May 2016

    @dailymc said:
    Please fix your signature, it's currently breaking rules.

    Maximum of two lines, with three links total.

    sorry for that, thanks tell and now has fix it.

  • cociucociu Member

    notgod said: similarly, we also hate

    but we can not avoid the occasional user of this

    we just need time to remove, don't just close port

    i am 2014-03-28 22:07:22 - today just one abuse to this problem
    this really not very much

    i mantain my word, every country have low against this , and personaly i prefere to avoid any problem and instead of power down my dc , i profere suspend a service until i talk with the client.

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member

    @cociu said:

    notgod said: similarly, we also hate

    but we can not avoid the occasional user of this

    we just need time to remove, don't just close port

    i am 2014-03-28 22:07:22 - today just one abuse to this problem
    this really not very much

    i mantain my word, every country have low against this , and personaly i prefere to avoid any problem and instead of power down my dc , i profere suspend a service until i talk with the client.

    By that logic I could now upload a child porn pic as an attachment to a ticket on your main site and then message CloudFlare that you host child porn?

    Would you appreciate CloudFlare suspending you before notifying you?

Sign In or Register to comment.