Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Help Transferring a Large File - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Help Transferring a Large File

2»

Comments

  • belinikbelinik Member

    use syncthing/btsync.... setup 5-6 server around us..... ?

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    agoldenberg said: It's getting files to Buffalo from Dacentec that's the issue. Buffalo is slow as molasses downloading from almost every one of my other servers.

    You might be looking at the wrong party in this conversation.

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    Around 62.5 MB/s to Dacentec from Chicago if that helps?

  • NyrNyr Community Contributor, Veteran

    I see two factors involved here:

    • Dacentec network is not exactly great
    • ColoCrossing sucks all around

    So I see two easy solutions:

    • If you need a better network, pay more than dirt-cheap Dacentec
    • Don't buy from a company as shitty as ColoCrossing (except if you want to DDoS or send spam).

    Still, I guess everyone will be complaining about those two ISPs for the years to come. Lovely LET :)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Nyr said: ColoCrossing sucks all around

    Now that's just not nice!

    Nor is it true.

  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    Use axel instead of wget

    Thanked by 2netomx inthecloudblog
  • budi1413budi1413 Member

    hostnoob said: axel

    How about aria2c?

    Thanked by 1inthecloudblog
  • FlamesRunnerFlamesRunner Member

    Huh.

    I'm going to quickly take a speed test off of my CC server, so yeah...

    Huh. Looks like the speeds have increased to one that is usable.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @FlamesRunner said:
    Huh.

    I'm going to quickly take a speed test off of my CC server, so yeah...

    Huh. Looks like the speeds have increased to one that is usable.

    Consider picking a different test server. Perhaps there is an issue with the test node in Toronto.

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    Spoke to both @jbiloh and @dacentec. Both say they can't do dick about the 800kbps between cc buffalo and dacentec NC..... Kinda stupid really.

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    @agoldenberg said:
    Spoke to both @jbiloh and @dacentec. Both say they can't do dick about the 800kbps between cc buffalo and dacentec NC..... Kinda stupid really.

    Not Gbps for sure but not 800kbps either... or maybe I'm just lucky

    [root@bufr ~]# wget http://mirror.dacentec.com/1000MB.bin
--2016-04-21 13:30:58--  http://mirror.dacentec.com/1000MB.bin
Resolving mirror.dacentec.com... 199.191.56.90, 2607:5600::c7bf:385a
Connecting to mirror.dacentec.com|199.191.56.90|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1000000000 (954M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 1000MB.bin

100%[=========================================>] 1,000,000,000 10.8M/s   in 87s     

2016-04-21 13:32:25 (11.0 MB/s) - 1000MB.bin saved [1000000000/1000000000]

    --

    [root@bufr ~]# traceroute mirror.dacentec.com
traceroute to mirror.dacentec.com (199.191.56.90), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.8.11.161 (10.8.11.161)  1.022 ms  1.749 ms  2.463 ms
 2  10.8.21.101 (10.8.21.101)  0.670 ms  0.729 ms 10.8.28.85 (10.8.28.85)  0.574 ms
 3  10.8.12.33 (10.8.12.33)  0.193 ms  0.173 ms 10.8.28.57 (10.8.28.57)  24.632 ms
 4  10.8.25.197 (10.8.25.197)  0.246 ms 10.8.24.73 (10.8.24.73)  0.289 ms 10.8.25.197 (10.8.25.197)  0.245 ms
 5  buf-b1-link.telia.net (62.115.59.97)  0.401 ms  0.462 ms  0.403 ms
 6  nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (62.115.141.179)  9.740 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net (62.115.141.181)  10.044 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (62.115.141.179)  9.662 ms
 7  ash-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.138.25)  15.991 ms  16.025 ms  15.990 ms
 8  cha-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.245.205)  22.640 ms cha-b1-link.telia.net (62.115.115.210)  22.732 ms cha-b1-link.telia.net (62.115.138.43)  25.435 ms
 9  dacentec-ic-308510-cha-b1.c.telia.net (62.115.40.230)  25.393 ms  25.387 ms  28.294 ms
10  dct-cr01-10g-8-4.dacentec.com (199.255.156.130)  25.194 ms  33.017 ms  33.957 ms
11  mirror.dacentec.com (199.191.56.90)  31.008 ms  28.208 ms  30.970 ms
  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    @fredqc I wonder why mine is so slow then... fuck.

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    See I get that same result on their test server. In fact faster

    root@buffalo [~]# wget http://mirror.dacentec.com/1000MB.bin
--2016-04-21 14:44:01--  http://mirror.dacentec.com/1000MB.bin
Resolving mirror.dacentec.com... 199.191.56.90, 2607:5600::c7bf:385a
Connecting to mirror.dacentec.com|199.191.56.90|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1000000000 (954M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “1000MB.bin”

100%[====================================>] 1,000,000,000 35.7M/s   in 30s

2016-04-21 14:44:31 (32.0 MB/s) - “1000MB.bin” saved [1000000000/1000000000]

    However SFTP is what I'm using and its slow as bawls.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Doesn't sound like this is a ColoCrossing problem.

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    Here's the same wget but from my buffalo box

    wget ***.***.***.86/uploads.tar.gz
--2016-04-21 14:52:11--  http://***.***.***.86/uploads.tar.gz
Connecting to ***.***.***.86:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 19569018880 (18G) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: “uploads.tar.gz”

 0% [                                              ] 8,154,828    803K/s  eta 6h 28m
    Thanked by 1inthecloudblog
  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    Fucky Something Is....

    Thanked by 1netomx
  • lewekleoneklewekleonek Member

    Hey, what if you start sshd on the source server on port 80, just for the heck of testing the speed?

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    @lewekleonek nah it's not going to help. I'm just going to move my backups elsewhere. Can't have a backup taking 5 and a half hours to restore.

  • inthecloudbloginthecloudblog Member
    edited April 2016

    @agoldenberg said:
    @jbiloh as you can see from this thread clearly there's still a slow download issue. Raised 2 tickets with HVH and they're telling me what I'm saying is unclear. It's an issue with Hibernia sucking.

    Hibernia is rubbish btw. Quadix uses them
    EDIT: OP: managed to dl all those backups?

  • dragon2611dragon2611 Member

    @dacentec to the UK seems pretty slow as well, usually below 10Mbit/s but then again giving I'm paying them under £20 or so (Depending on the exchange rates) for a box with 2x 2TB disks in it and 16GB ram I guess I don't really get to moan to much ;-)

  • MadMad Member
    edited April 2016

    screen + rsync , the best combination :)

  • dragon2611dragon2611 Member

    I find Syncthing is pretty useful if you have a folder you want to keep in sync ;-)

Sign In or Register to comment.