Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

LEB Community Updates

2»

Comments

  • @luissousa said:

    @vedran said:

    @mpkossen said:
    Removing a regular expression altogether isn't fixing things, it's going for another solution. The reason behind the regex was to allow quoting without nesting. Right now I believe infinite nesting in quotes is an option.

    are

    you

    sure

    that's

    a

    problem?
    >

    >

    >

    >

    or

    maybe

    it

    is
    >

    >

    >

    I see a potentially new form of art over here.

    This reminds me of the gradient effects in PowerPoint that everyone thought was cool in 2004.

  • dailydaily Member

    @OnraHost_Zack said:

    @luissousa said:

    @vedran said:

    @mpkossen said:
    Removing a regular expression altogether isn't fixing things, it's going for another solution. The reason behind the regex was to allow quoting without nesting. Right now I believe infinite nesting in quotes is an option.

    are

    you

    sure

    that's

    a

    problem?
    >

    >

    >

    >

    or

    maybe

    it

    is
    >

    >

    >

    I see a potentially new form of art over here.

    This reminds me of the gradient effects in PowerPoint that everyone thought was cool in 2004.

    How dark does it get?

  • HBAndreiHBAndrei Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    @dailymc said:

    @OnraHost_Zack said:

    @luissousa said:

    @vedran said:

    @mpkossen said:
    Removing a regular expression altogether isn't fixing things, it's going for another solution. The reason behind the regex was to allow quoting without nesting. Right now I believe infinite nesting in quotes is an option.

    are

    you

    sure

    that's

    a

    problem?
    >

    >

    >

    >

    or

    maybe

    it

    is
    >

    >

    >

    I see a potentially new form of art over here.

    This reminds me of the gradient effects in PowerPoint that everyone thought was cool in 2004.

    How dark does it get?

    Extremely dark.

  • edited April 2016

    @HBAndrei said:

    @dailymc said:

    @OnraHost_Zack said:

    @luissousa said:

    @vedran said:

    @mpkossen said:
    Removing a regular expression altogether isn't fixing things, it's going for another solution. The reason behind the regex was to allow quoting without nesting. Right now I believe infinite nesting in quotes is an option.

    are

    you

    sure

    that's

    a

    problem?
    >

    >

    >

    >

    or

    maybe

    it

    is
    >

    >

    >

    I see a potentially new form of art over here.

    This reminds me of the gradient effects in PowerPoint that everyone thought was cool in 2004.

    How dark does it get?

    Extremely dark.

    Nice pattern.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    qrwteyrutiyoup said: Nice pattern.

    LowEndGoatse.

  • AmitzAmitz Member

    "Doom I, Tight Edition".

Sign In or Register to comment.