New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
How low are are you looking for?
Leaseweb,DO,Dediserve,HostUS
It seems that Leaseweb, DO and HostUS all have inferior networks when it comes to CT peering. I have not tested Dediserve, but in HK they just gave up on CT so I won't even try them in SG.
What do you expect? CT is expensive, crappy and congested almost 24/7.
Very true. That is why you - if you take a minute to reflect - can probably appreciate my specific hosting location requirement.
If you want good connectivity to china its not going to be on the LET pricing.
Not sure if allowed to ask this: What other choices exist? Right now, all traffic to geographically near, affordable hosting get bounced off of US west coast.
leaseweb is ok for CT actually,but terrible to CU
No Leaseweb is terrible to CT. Either their SG or HK nodes are terrible, PING is more than 250ms and download speed is less than 100KB/s
I can confirm that CT to Leaseweb anywhere is bad. CT routes everything Leaseweb (SG, Tokyo) to US Westcoast and then back. Just terrible.
you need lotserver aka serverspeeder and I'm getting 4MB/s in off peak hours with that installed
Zeta-TCP is very interesting, thanks for the tip. This won't help with routing though.