Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Hetzner vServer CX50 review? Is it good? Any benchmark?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner vServer CX50 review? Is it good? Any benchmark?

Hello,

Is this vServer good?
https://www.hetzner.de/hosting/produkte_vserver/cx50

About uptime,performance,network?

Is there any benhcmark about cpu performance?

Thanks :)

Comments

  • I have a CX10 if you want some benches from that

  • @PyroChicken said:
    I have a CX10 if you want some benches from that

    if you could rund this i will be very happy :)

    https://freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh

    Thank you if possible!

  • jaycbrjaycbr Member
    edited April 2016

    @ZweiTiger said:

    @PyroChicken said:
    I have a CX10 if you want some benches from that

    if you could rund this i will be very happy :)

    https://freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh

    Thank you if possible!

    Not the same guy but I also have a CX10. Here's my results:

    Benchmark started on Sun May  1 00:41:15 CEST 2016
    Full benchmark log: /home/--/bench.log
    
    System Info
    -----------
    Processor       : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    CPU Cores       : 1
    Frequency       : 1999.999 MHz
    Memory          : 992 MB
    Swap            :  MB
    Uptime          : 1:21,
    
    OS              : Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    Arch            : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel          : 4.4.0-21-generic
    Hostname        : Ubuntu-1604-xenial-64-minimal
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is 78.xx.xx.xx
    
    Location                Provider        Speed
    CDN                     Cachefly        40.9MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          8.23MB/s
    Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       9.87MB/s
    Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       6.98MB/s
    San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       7.77MB/s
    Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       8.84MB/s
    
    Tokyo, Japan            Linode          6.38MB/s
    Singapore               Softlayer       6.87MB/s
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         18.5MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        31.2MB/s
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 508 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 478 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 501 MB/s
    Average I/O     : 495.667 MB/s
    

    Here's also cpuinfo:

    processor       : 0
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 42
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    stepping        : 1
    microcode       : 0x1
    cpu MHz         : 1999.999
    cache size      : 4096 KB
    physical id     : 0
    siblings        : 1
    core id         : 0
    cpu cores       : 1
    apicid          : 0
    initial apicid  : 0
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 13
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx rdtscp lm fpu pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx hypervisor lahf_lm xsaveopt arat
    bugs            :
    bogomips        : 3999.99
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    

    and openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc:

    The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
    aes-128-cbc     392472.07k   434565.39k   448849.34k   448461.96k   447919.66k
    
  • @jaycbr said:

    Thanks , but finally i am with netcup.de :)

  • teamaccteamacc Member

    Sounds like the online.net setup

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @vimalware said:

    depends how you'd define that ;-) those CX boxes get their own dedicated IPv4 address.

    but they are connected more like a routed setup so your VM has an internal IP in its network config which forwards 1:1 from and to the external IPv4.

  • BochiBochi Member

    @Falzo said:
    but they are connected more like a routed setup so your VM has an internal IP in its network config which forwards 1:1 from and to the external IPv4.

    Anyone can elaborate on what could be the reasons for this setup and which pros / cons it has compared to directly assigning the IPs to the VMs?

  • FalzoFalzo Member

    @Bochi said:

    as I am not so familiar with network setups used in DCs I can only try and make an educated guess ;-)

    if I am not totally wrong to set up virtual machines you could either assign smaller subnets to the hostnodes but will loose usable IPs for gateway and broadcast and such.

    or use some sort of bridged setup where you have to add virtual mac adresses for every single IP and assign that vmacs to the VM.
    this may come with some more effort in doing so, at least automatically, as this may involve more systems than the hostnode itself (router perhaps) ...

    so easiest way may be routing all IPs in question just to the hostnode which then simply sets a static route to the VM.
    that VM internally gets a private IP assigned as endpoint of that route.

    so no need to use extra IPs for gateway and broadcast etc and probably most of the setup can be done on the hostnode directly.

    Thanked by 2Bochi vimalware
  • teamaccteamacc Member

    Dont forget about the added bonus of easy migrating. Just need to re-route the internal address, maybe even change it, but keep the external one. No need to move subnets between nodes and whatnot

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • Those cx50s would be good value as local memcache considering hetzner's current serverbidding rates.

  • vimalwarevimalware Member
    edited May 2016

    OK. My reading comprehension was imaginative in an ultra-sleep-deprived state.

    Correction: It DOES have public IPv4.
    Currently the private IP is the same for all: 172.31.1.100. The public IP is displayed in the Robot.

  • OK. My reading comprehension was imaginative in an ultra-sleep-deprived state.

    Correction: It DOES have public IPv4.
    Currently the private IP is the same for all: 172.31.1.100. The public IP is displayed in the Robot.

    More detailed : http://serverfault.com/questions/725255/cant-use-external-ip-on-hetzner-vps/773897#773897

Sign In or Register to comment.