[Free] KVM 512mb 1 week plan, testing nodes

qq7119

@entrailz said:

TheBudgetVPS - Invoice 5

Enter the coupon did not find a place, and now you need to process the order

entrailz

@qq7119 said:
Enter the coupon did not find a place, and now you need to process the order

Hi,

Sorry this test is only for the 512mb package.

Thanks.

qq7119

@entrailz said:
Thanks.

512mb package. Your connection is wrong, does not show

entrailz

@qq7119 said:
512mb package. Your connection is wrong, does not show

Hey,

If I understand you correctly, it isn't showing the 512mb? If so that means all test packages have been redeemed sadly.

Thanks

qq7119

I can understand that it is in fact!

commercial exploitation

entrailz

@qq7119 said:
I can understand that it is in fact!

commercial exploitation

I do not understand? I only provided one link, that was to the package that the coupon works with, and stated there was a limited amount, I am sorry you feel that way.

Thanks.

qq7119

@entrailz said:

Nothing important, everyone can have Different understanding

Kyn_DH

Congrats with your move... @entrailz

alexnjh

NY node

Benchmark started on Sat Mar  5 23:17:33 EST 2016
Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log

System Info
-----------
Processor       : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores       : 1
Frequency       : 3392.294 MHz
Memory          : 490 MB
Swap            :  MB
Uptime          : 40 min,

OS              : \S
Arch            : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel          : 3.10.0-123.4.2.el7.x86_64
Hostname        : demo.demo


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 

Location                Provider        Speed
CDN                     Cachefly        70.3MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          625KB/s
Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       28.0MB/s
Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       16.7MB/s
San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       16.0MB/s
Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       4.83MB/s

Tokyo, Japan            Linode          8.26MB/s
Singapore               Softlayer       4.86MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         6.00MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        9.33MB/s


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 98.3 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 105 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 106 MB/s
Average I/O     : 103.1 MB/s

DD test:

[root@demo ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.1995 s, 105 MB/s

Server bear:

http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/06/OAlyPzCOzcv6UKYc

Its pretty good actually from the benchmark except for the speedtest at atlanta.

exception0x876

what RAID do you use on host nodes?

FlamesRunner

http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/06/RLkCNjRDiCJRf6HP

On Kansas node.

entrailz

@masterqqq said:
NY node

Thanks for testing, seems to be within expected results, which is good!

@exception0x876 said:
what RAID do you use on host nodes?

These machines are not yet production ready, and are only running on one HDD, so no RAID.

@FlamesRunner said:
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/06/RLkCNjRDiCJRf6HP

On Kansas node.

Seems the machine itself performs OK, the network is less than ideal. Still waiting to hear back from Dedispec.

daily

@qq7119 said:
Nothing important, everyone can have Different understanding

Sorry it was a misunderstanding.

entrailz

@FlamesRunner said:
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2016/03/06/RLkCNjRDiCJRf6HP

On Kansas node.

Just got word back saying the machine is now on a 1Gbit port, anyway you could re-do the network tests?

Thanks.