Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Steps to get a speedtest.net result link - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Steps to get a speedtest.net result link

2»

Comments

  • not bad

  • tuxtux Member
    edited February 2013

    image
    image

  • @black I think it downloads the test file k to ram maybe?

  • @BenND said: @black I think it downloads the test file k to ram maybe?

    Yeah that makes sense. Not sure why it does that though, it'd be better if it goes to /dev/null

  • wroxwrox Member
    edited February 2013

    I am satisfied.

    image
    Kimsufi.

    image
    TorqHost.

  • someone knows what to change in the python code to save the file download on the disk instead of the RAM? I don't know python :P

    Otherwise on <=256MB with no burst VPSes it won't run

  • Gets killed even on my 512MB Edis.at VRS. I'll see if I can change it to download to /dev/null. I don't know any python but how hard can it be? :)

  • sandrosandro Member
    edited February 2013

    @Gary said: Gets killed even on my 512MB Edis.at VRS. I'll see if I can change it to download to /dev/null. I don't know any python but how hard can it be? :)

    Don't know but I saw it uses some URL (urlopen) function that goes directly into RAM, just like PHP (that I know)

    def run(self):
    try:
    if (time.time() - self.starttime) <= 10:
    f = urllib.request.urlopen(self.url)
    contents = f.read()
    f.close()
    self.result = contents
    else:
    self.result = ''
    except IOError:
    self.result = ''

  • Anyone ever get this working on a 128mb LEB? Get errors on hostigation and buyvm.

    Works great with 2gb CVPS
    image

  • @detpack What's your leb provider?

  • [root@devbox ~]# python speedtest-cli.py --simple
    Ping: 36.001 ms
    Download: 616.37 Mbit/s
    Upload: 47.48 Mbit/s
    [root@devbox ~]# clear
    [root@devbox ~]# python speedtest-cli.py --simple
    Ping: 35.683 ms
    Download: 679.02 Mbit/s
    Upload: 48.01 Mbit/s
    [root@devbox ~]# python speedtest-cli.py --simple
    Ping: 35.365 ms
    Download: 415.46 Mbit/s
    Upload: 47.85 Mbit/s
    [root@devbox ~]# clear
    [root@devbox ~]#

  • @curtisg said: 36.001

    do you really have to fake speedtest results
    really?

  • 1 GB OVZ
    image
    image
    image

  • edited February 2013

    My Prometeus VZ5
    image

    My DigitalOcean in NewYork1
    image

  • jmmillejmmille Member
    edited February 2013

    FlipHost Storage VPS (Dallas)

    Boosthosting (Chicago)

    Hostigation (CLT)

  • NexusNexus Member
    edited February 2013

    @Roph said: ChicagoVPS:

    Why is this one so low?

    Edit: To find out all the id's for the cli script, go here:

    http://speedtest.net/speedtest-servers.php

    Man that readme file is a piece of shit.

  • @Nexus said: Why is this one so low?

    Hi Nexus,

    Take a look at the location. He tested from a speedtest server located in Wichita, KS, likely because a couple of our IP ranges were SWIP'd to that location. However, we do not even offer a hosting location out of Wichita, KS. As such - I do not feel it is a fair test, since the other speedtest's he posted for the other providers were probably in the same city/location as the servers were, whereas the speed test he did for us was out of a location we do not even offer services in.

    @detpack has posted a speedtest result of our Los Angeles location, and the results are excellent.

    Thanks,

    Kevin

  • anyone know what's this error?

    Testing download speed........................................Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "./speed", line 403, in
    speedtest()
    File "./speed", line 345, in speedtest
    dlspeed = downloadSpeed(urls, args.simple)
    File "./speed", line 109, in downloadSpeed
    return (len(''.join(finished))/(time.time()-start))
    MemoryError

  • @cosmicgate
    The script is very memory hungry. It has a tough time running on hosts with less than 512MB ram. I asked a buddy of mine (python guy) to take a look at the script and see if he could cache it to disk so atleast it would run. It's not perfect because disk write speed affects the results, but it is pretty close to the right numbers.

  • Tried this via ssh socks:
    ipxocre:
    image

    buyvm:
    image

Sign In or Register to comment.