Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Default WHMCS Client Area vs. Custom ShoveHost Client Area - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Default WHMCS Client Area vs. Custom ShoveHost Client Area

2»

Comments

  • For me, B.

    It's nice to actually see someone doing something different with WHMCS rather than just wrapping the template in their header and footer.

  • Thank you (:

    @DeanClinton said: It's nice to actually see someone doing something different with WHMCS rather than just wrapping the template in their header and footer.

    I'd agree with that - I think basing a site around WHMCS could actually work, and much better than it would basing WHMCS around your site, especially from a UX point of view.

  • shovenoseshovenose Member, Host Rep

    Well for the fact that my entire site is in WHMCS I did a good job so far. I like how seamless it makes the browsing/ordering/billing/support

Sign In or Register to comment.