Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


RAM VS CPU - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RAM VS CPU

2»

Comments

  • @Kenshin
    thanks for the tip but i prefer my offers... i do profit from other servers for around 3~ years.

  • Basically, he's just selling High-Availability VPS.

  • @gubbyte said: I can't help but laugh when I read this alongside the name of your company.

    Well i was thinking its good name but i also have doservers.com domain that im thinking to change

  • As I mostly use LEB for a webhosting, have a shared cores are perfectly fine for me. I won't use them all the times, but as a webserver is multithreaded I would prefer to have a resources available for a peak usage. Yet my load average stays at ~0.1-0.2.

    The other thing I saw is the throttled CPU. I.e. you only get a share of MHz/% from cores, but you usually really have them dedicated. This isn't good for a webhosting, because during peaks your VPS will be slow. But might be an option for some tasks, where you need a constant high CPU usage but dedi are our of budget. But this is a rare case. Most people are fine with shared cores and fair use.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    On topic...

    The question was ram or CPU. I like both. :)

  • budingyunbudingyun Member
    edited January 2013

    RamNode/RamHost for RAM. ;)

  • gkzgkz Member

    For my current need, I only need ram rather than cpu.

  • RAM is really important. CPU not that much. If you really need so much dedicated CPU you should not go for LEB as LEB VPS cannot provide it.

Sign In or Register to comment.