New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Need some help
Need download tests please http://24khost.com/100MBtest.zip
Comments
Started around 2mb/s and steadily went up until it was done at 18.7mb/s. Took 9.7s total. From Dallas.
Takes 3-4 seconds on a 60mbit connection from Western Europe. What kind of sorcery is this?
Where is this hosted? I keep getting ultra-high speeds which are higher than what my ISP plan offers!
From Virginia.
I think it's heavily compressed (tar.gz) because it takes 0.3 seconds... (UK)
2.9M/s from Kansas City (Datashack)
43 M/s from Kansas City (Wholesale)
6.75 M/s from Atlanta (Ramnode)
9.63 M/s from Buffalo (BuyVM)
7.18 M/s from Lenoir (Crowncloud - Dacentec)
11.7 M/s from Dallas (Incero - Colounlimited)
1.5 M/s from Time Warner Cable modem (near 100% line speed - never see that anywhere else)
56.7 M/s from South Bend (Your facility )
I remember that there was a host who had test files that consisted of sparse files ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_file ) that would artificially inflate speed tests. Maybe you picked up one of these by accident?
Try downloading http://carbon.ipxcore.com/sparse_test by comparison.
Southbend IN in Colostore datacenter.
databasebydesign server
colocrossing
rocketvps
Amsterdam, NL (100mb port):
Started off at around 700-800K then began to speed up:
`100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 4.35M/s in 38s
2012-12-12 18:44:52 (2.66 MB/s) - "/dev/null" saved [105573937/105573937]
Cachefly for comparison:
`100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 12.9M/s in 7.8s
2012-12-12 18:45:37 (12.8 MB/s) - "/dev/null" saved [104857600/104857600]`
These servers have GB connection.
That is too much work. The easiest would be SSL compression. If you want to cheat, make it easy :P
USA Tests:
123Systems Dallas, TX (1Gbit shared):
Started off at around 2M then began to speed up:
100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 10.9M/s in 14s
2012-12-12 21:50:53 (7.09 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [105573937/105573937]
Cachefly for comparison:
100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 52.8M/s in 1.9s
2012-12-12 21:51:08 (52.8 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
Buffalo, NY (100mbit) (ChicagoVPS, poor network overall right now it seems):
100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 3.43M/s in 31s
2012-12-12 22:53:25 (3.24 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [105573937/105573937]
Cachefly for comparison:
Saving to: `/dev/null'
100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 3.13M/s in 30s
But only requests are affected by SQL
Anybody got a different 100mb file we can try?
want to test if it is the file or the connection.
Dallas, TX
http://192.211.52.131/1000mb.bin
Cachefly?
If you are on a shared GBIT and your clients are already utilizing it and on top of that, you have multiple people downloading your files at the same time, you can not expect people to have awesome transfer speed. Company test file should have its own connection
http://24khost.com/100MBtest2.zip
please test this new one.
dd if=/dev/urandom of=100MBtest2.zip bs=1M count=100
is how it was made
Dallas, Tx Dedicated 100mbps,
100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 8.49M/s in 16s
2012-12-12 14:01:25 (6.27 MB/s) - â100MBtest2.zipâ
@24khost
Barely any difference +- from the previous file
~360KB/s on my home 40Mbits connection (Fiber Line)
The second one is about 1.5MB/s.
Dallas Gbit:
Cachefly:
Test2
Test1
thank you guys looks like it was not the file. looks like it just happened to be a good netwrok.
2012-12-13 01:20:43 (2.70 MB/s) - '100MBtest.zip'
test2 - 2.24 MB/s on my 128 Mbit/s cable connection