Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Need some help
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Need some help

24khost24khost Member
edited December 2012 in Help

Need download tests please http://24khost.com/100MBtest.zip

Comments

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Started around 2mb/s and steadily went up until it was done at 18.7mb/s. Took 9.7s total. From Dallas.

  • WunderbarWunderbar Member
    edited December 2012

    Takes 3-4 seconds on a 60mbit connection from Western Europe. What kind of sorcery is this?

  • Where is this hosted? I keep getting ultra-high speeds which are higher than what my ISP plan offers!

  • 100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 8.38M/s   in 14s
    
    2012-12-12 10:41:53 (7.33 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [105573937/105573937]
    

    From Virginia.

  • erhwegesrgsrerhwegesrgsr Member
    edited December 2012

    I think it's heavily compressed (tar.gz) because it takes 0.3 seconds... (UK)

  • pubcrawlerpubcrawler Banned
    edited December 2012

    2.9M/s from Kansas City (Datashack)
    43 M/s from Kansas City (Wholesale)
    6.75 M/s from Atlanta (Ramnode)
    9.63 M/s from Buffalo (BuyVM)
    7.18 M/s from Lenoir (Crowncloud - Dacentec)
    11.7 M/s from Dallas (Incero - Colounlimited)

    1.5 M/s from Time Warner Cable modem (near 100% line speed - never see that anywhere else)
    56.7 M/s from South Bend (Your facility :) )

  • DamianDamian Member
    edited December 2012

    I remember that there was a host who had test files that consisted of sparse files ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_file ) that would artificially inflate speed tests. Maybe you picked up one of these by accident?

    Try downloading http://carbon.ipxcore.com/sparse_test by comparison.

  • Southbend IN in Colostore datacenter.

  • databasebydesign server

    --2012-12-13 01:45:47--  http://24khost.com/100MBtest.zip
    Resolving 24khost.com... 67.214.184.123
    Connecting to 24khost.com|67.214.184.123|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 105573937 (101M) [application/zip]
    Saving to: “/dev/null”
    
    100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 105,573,937 14.7M/s   in 9.8s    
    
    2012-12-13 01:45:56 (10.3 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [105573937/105573937]
    

    colocrossing

    65% [==================================================================================>                                            ] 69,135,808  1.24M/s  eta 28s
    

    rocketvps

    2012-12-13 01:47:26 (8.98 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [105573937/105573937]
    
  • jkr1711jkr1711 Member
    edited December 2012

    Amsterdam, NL (100mb port):

    Started off at around 700-800K then began to speed up:

    `100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 4.35M/s in 38s

    2012-12-12 18:44:52 (2.66 MB/s) - "/dev/null" saved [105573937/105573937]

    Cachefly for comparison:

    `100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 12.9M/s in 7.8s

    2012-12-12 18:45:37 (12.8 MB/s) - "/dev/null" saved [104857600/104857600]`

  • These servers have GB connection.

  • @Damian said: I remember that there was a host who had test files that consisted of sparse files ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_file ) that would artificially inflate speed tests. Maybe you picked up one of these by accident?

    Try downloading http://carbon.ipxcore.com/sparse_test by comparison.

    That is too much work. The easiest would be SSL compression. If you want to cheat, make it easy :P

  • jkr1711jkr1711 Member
    edited December 2012

    USA Tests:

    123Systems Dallas, TX (1Gbit shared):

    Started off at around 2M then began to speed up:

    100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 10.9M/s in 14s

    2012-12-12 21:50:53 (7.09 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [105573937/105573937]

    Cachefly for comparison:

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 52.8M/s in 1.9s

    2012-12-12 21:51:08 (52.8 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

    Buffalo, NY (100mbit) (ChicagoVPS, poor network overall right now it seems):

    100%[======================================>] 105,573,937 3.43M/s in 31s

    2012-12-12 22:53:25 (3.24 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [105573937/105573937]

    Cachefly for comparison:

    Saving to: `/dev/null'

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 3.13M/s in 30s

  • @NHRoel said: SSL compression

    But only requests are affected by SQL :o

  • Anybody got a different 100mb file we can try?

  • want to test if it is the file or the connection.

  • @24khost said: want to test if it is the file or the connection.

    Dallas, TX
    http://192.211.52.131/1000mb.bin

  • @24khost said: Anybody got a different 100mb file we can try?

    Cachefly?

    @24khost said: want to test if it is the file or the connection.

    If you are on a shared GBIT and your clients are already utilizing it and on top of that, you have multiple people downloading your files at the same time, you can not expect people to have awesome transfer speed. Company test file should have its own connection :)

  • 24khost24khost Member
    edited December 2012

    http://24khost.com/100MBtest2.zip

    please test this new one.

  • dd if=/dev/urandom of=100MBtest2.zip bs=1M count=100
    is how it was made

  • Dallas, Tx Dedicated 100mbps,

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 8.49M/s in 16s

    2012-12-12 14:01:25 (6.27 MB/s) - â100MBtest2.zipâ

  • @24khost

    Barely any difference +- from the previous file

  • ~360KB/s on my home 40Mbits connection (Fiber Line)
    The second one is about 1.5MB/s.

  • PatrickPatrick Member
    edited December 2012

    Dallas Gbit:

    Cachefly:

    2012-12-12 14:25:09 (97.3 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

    Test2

    2012-12-12 14:23:55 (16.8 MB/s) - `100MBtest2.zip' saved [104857600/104857600]

    Test1

    2012-12-12 14:24:30 (11.5 MB/s) - `100MBtest.zip' saved [104857600/104857600]

  • thank you guys looks like it was not the file. looks like it just happened to be a good netwrok.

  • 2012-12-13 01:20:43 (2.70 MB/s) - '100MBtest.zip'

  • gsrdgrdghdgsrdgrdghd Member
    edited December 2012

    test2 - 2.24 MB/s on my 128 Mbit/s cable connection

Sign In or Register to comment.